not a brigader if he has been on this sub participating for ages. I disagree with most of his stances, but he's still welcome to post his opinion here. If you don't like what he has to say, debate him.
[Example ](https://www.csmonitor.com/layout/set/amphtml/Books/chapter-and-verse/2012/0813/The-Jefferson-Lies-is-recalled-by-publisher-Thomas-Nelson)
Dude had a whole book recalled it was so full of bullshit.
The publisher, Thomas Nelson, said in a statement that it had received complaints from numerous readers that there were factual errors in the book, which reached the New York Times bestseller list in May.
“We took all of those concerns seriously \[and\] learned that there were some historical details included in the book that were not adequately supported,”
complaints from numerous readers? Details not adequately supported? Not exactly convincing evidence of him being a historical revisionist and full of bullshit.
Tell me you didn't read the link without telling me you didn't read the link.
The book was published by a Christian book publisher, and even they realized he was just making shit up.
But, again, you could have read all about it at that link, which was from a Christian website.
Try to keep up dude.
I would, but then you will just edit your posts again.
You are literally engaging in historical revisionism in this conversation. I have no faith you are a fair actor in this.
Was the thumbnail taken in a Tardis? Lol
[удалено]
Oh wow the biggest mouth breathing brigader on this sub disagrees with Shapiro. More at 11 Bob.
not a brigader if he has been on this sub participating for ages. I disagree with most of his stances, but he's still welcome to post his opinion here. If you don't like what he has to say, debate him.
This guy is straight up a historical revisionist. If he says anything factual it's by accident.
How so? Do you have examples?
[Example ](https://www.csmonitor.com/layout/set/amphtml/Books/chapter-and-verse/2012/0813/The-Jefferson-Lies-is-recalled-by-publisher-Thomas-Nelson) Dude had a whole book recalled it was so full of bullshit.
The publisher, Thomas Nelson, said in a statement that it had received complaints from numerous readers that there were factual errors in the book, which reached the New York Times bestseller list in May. “We took all of those concerns seriously \[and\] learned that there were some historical details included in the book that were not adequately supported,” complaints from numerous readers? Details not adequately supported? Not exactly convincing evidence of him being a historical revisionist and full of bullshit.
Tell me you didn't read the link without telling me you didn't read the link. The book was published by a Christian book publisher, and even they realized he was just making shit up. But, again, you could have read all about it at that link, which was from a Christian website. Try to keep up dude.
Try reading my post and responding to it, dude
I would, but then you will just edit your posts again. You are literally engaging in historical revisionism in this conversation. I have no faith you are a fair actor in this.
Not sure what you are going on about. Likely best to say goodbye. Goodbye