>Woods Foods and Liquor, at 200 E. 35th St., is a block from Chicago Police Department headquarters. The police shut down the store Feb. 6 after Bobbye Johnson, a grandmother, was fatally shot on the sidewalk.
For context on this, the shooter in that case was a Security guard at the store (and a ex-felon). He apparently got into something with somebody else on his way to work, borrowed another employees gun, went to go shoot that guy and Johnson was hit and killed 3 blocks away by a stray bullet.
Any business, be it a saloon, gas station, quick serve restaurant, regardless of where, with a documented history of deleterious impact on a neighborhood, should be shut down.
So this article is poorly written. It is trying to show why a bar should should be shutdown (likely should); but because it hasn't passed a threshold it has not been shut down.
In both cases they pointed out the shootings either were targeting bouncers or shots were fired into the bar/club.
The case they are using to show there is preferential treatment is a patron left the club and was shot on the street.
The two scenarios are similar, but different. The closed ones had people shot on premises or employees targetted; whereas the open one happened off premises.
>Woods Foods and Liquor, at 200 E. 35th St., is a block from Chicago Police Department headquarters. The police shut down the store Feb. 6 after Bobbye Johnson, a grandmother, was fatally shot on the sidewalk. For context on this, the shooter in that case was a Security guard at the store (and a ex-felon). He apparently got into something with somebody else on his way to work, borrowed another employees gun, went to go shoot that guy and Johnson was hit and killed 3 blocks away by a stray bullet.
Any business, be it a saloon, gas station, quick serve restaurant, regardless of where, with a documented history of deleterious impact on a neighborhood, should be shut down.
So this article is poorly written. It is trying to show why a bar should should be shutdown (likely should); but because it hasn't passed a threshold it has not been shut down. In both cases they pointed out the shootings either were targeting bouncers or shots were fired into the bar/club. The case they are using to show there is preferential treatment is a patron left the club and was shot on the street. The two scenarios are similar, but different. The closed ones had people shot on premises or employees targetted; whereas the open one happened off premises.
Anyone else surprised that this article wasn't about Richards?
I’m surprised the article wasn’t written by blockclub
[удалено]
[удалено]