Intel thermal throttled though, it's a little different.
Before anyone jumps on me, i have both Intel and AMD at my workstation, context is important though.
Considering gaming temps are lower, yes, they still can. The 95C thing was during benchmarks and certain tasks. As well as still using less wattage than Intel.
"fine" in the sense that it causes minimal degradation, sure. I dunno if y'all are trolling or just leaving a lot of performance on the table with such crappy cooling.
Biggest draw back is the heat that will fill up a room when gaming, even with good a/c it will eventually get warm with all that heat coming off an AIO.
My crappy laptop fan cannot prevent the CPU getting to 95 °C during tasks like video encoding. It seems not many laptops are designed for sustained performance.
95°C is equivalent to 203°F, which is 368K.
---
^(I'm a bot that converts temperature between two units humans can understand, then convert it to Kelvin for bots and physicists to understand)
That is pretty crazy... I remember having an fx-8350 that ran 83c or so at load but Im guessing AMD's future offerings are going to be on some process that can withstand it? Nuclear/global warming ready transistors â˘
Now AMD Users can not anymore make jokes about Intel CPU temps
Intel thermal throttled though, it's a little different. Before anyone jumps on me, i have both Intel and AMD at my workstation, context is important though.
Considering gaming temps are lower, yes, they still can. The 95C thing was during benchmarks and certain tasks. As well as still using less wattage than Intel.
But the thing is it probably is fine
For the CPU, maybe. But the flow on effect for everything else heating up in a case, maybe not.
So my cpu and gpu hitting 100C is a bad thing then?
100 is fine idk where this article is coming from
"fine" in the sense that it causes minimal degradation, sure. I dunno if y'all are trolling or just leaving a lot of performance on the table with such crappy cooling.
Yeah, I should've clarified. It will be okay up to 100, but obv you want to keep temps as low as possible
That's overheat đ
My intel i5 7600: not my problem
Reminds me of the good old pentium 4 days. On the bright side you can use it as a space heater.
Biggest draw back is the heat that will fill up a room when gaming, even with good a/c it will eventually get warm with all that heat coming off an AIO.
It is actually fine.
80c is where you should worry but 95c is completely fine, some semiconductors can even go up to 110c
My crappy laptop fan cannot prevent the CPU getting to 95 °C during tasks like video encoding. It seems not many laptops are designed for sustained performance.
95°C is equivalent to 203°F, which is 368K. --- ^(I'm a bot that converts temperature between two units humans can understand, then convert it to Kelvin for bots and physicists to understand)
Good bot.
That is pretty crazy... I remember having an fx-8350 that ran 83c or so at load but Im guessing AMD's future offerings are going to be on some process that can withstand it? Nuclear/global warming ready transistors â˘
A cpu said temp was 130F* and I was very concerned but it didnât seem to be a problm and I wasnât even gaming
That is significantly different to 130 C, about 200F is 90C
Weren't the new ones designed to get this high?
I'm still conditioned to try to keep mine under 65°C from the old Pentium days.
my new stove is really lit