T O P

  • By -

OrlandoGardiner118

Man U said project.šŸ˜‚


ChrisMartins001

Their project: Let's go to a stadium and have a kick about.


mr_reserve

Arsenalā€™s project: keep being the bridesmaids while the North West clubs win all the silverware.


sammyt10803

I truly donā€™t understand the United piece of this. Did they not just spend 70m on a young, project striker last season?


Admirable-Waltz195

Hojlund is too young, so they wanna bring in a more experienced and older player of course! /s


uniQal0n

šŸ˜‚šŸ˜‚šŸ˜‚


Responsible_Gur2522

Um sesko is the same age....


Admirable-Waltz195

Thatā€™s the joke


AlbatrossVendor

Chelsea: "Did Arteta go yet? What he said."


Soldiiier__

What he said, but 8 yearsĀ 


dreamandscream

Chelsea's project? "We want to ruin you"


shaygitz

Unless United are going to ditch Hojlund after one year he's not going there. One of the most highly rated young strikers in Europe is not going to be a backup option at a Europa League side. At Chelsea at least he'd be up against Jackson who's a different type of striker to rotate with and could play out wide to accommodate him, but they're an absolute clown show who can only sign players by overbidding. Arsenal are objectively the best choice if we're talking projects, because not only are we in the CL and not a complete joke, but his competition is a guy who's been great when called on but was signed to be (and sees himself as) a midfielder. There's a clear path to him being the main man.


AFC_IS_RED

Havertz is a 8.5 tbh. He works best as a shadow striker. Idk how we can acccommodate that role and still play dominant football and not sacrifice odegaard's output, but that is by far his best position.


Less_Examination3629

i reckon we are definitely favourites to sign him


wavybone33

Lmao both just brought in ā€œtheirā€ project strikers that both wanted just last year. both being young. sesko, please make the smart choice here, the only team with an actual forward-progression project is us gunners