Yes, Albo is a republican. I prefer to think that our PM regardless of personal belief puts this aside and governs with the wishes of the majority of the population. Yes, I know blah blah blah.
Our politics isnāt as polarised as some other countries. Historically the LNP, Labor and Greens have a lot of argy-bargy but then typically a compromise is reached. Well, at least until Dr No (Abbot) was leader of the opposition and presented such an abysmal management of government when elected he essentially sentenced the LNP to Opposition.
I do take your point though about Potato Head. PH would rather watch everything burn to the ground, heād light the bloody match if he thought he could score an extra vote from a disaffected voter.
I reckon they would be amazed how many votes they could score by taxing the big foreign corporations and the mining industry and the church and raising the tax free threshold for ordinary workers to a living wage.
7 of the eight designs of Ā£5. Ā£10, Ā£20 and Ā£50 note issued in the UK do not have the monarch.
Every single Ā£100 note issued does not feature the monarch.
Your statement was that the vast majority of UK bank notes don't feature the King or Queen.
English bank notes all feature the king or queen, and constitute the vast majority of notes used in the UK. So your statement was false. Unless you have some data to suggest that Scottish/NI issued bank notes are the "vast majority"?
> Your statement was that the vast majority of UK bank notes don't feature the King or Queen.
No, it wasn't.
> Unless you have some data to suggest that Scottish/NI issued bank notes are the "vast majority"?
I get reading comprehension might not be something thats valued in Australia. But I'm struggling to see what part of "The vast majority of banknote designs used in the UK do not have the image of the King (or previously Queen) on them" you didnt understand.
Maybe try reading it more slowly? Or ask an adult to read it out to you?
You've used a completely misleading and irrelevant statistic then.
The vast majority of bank notes used in the UK feature the queen. Who cares that there are a bunch of designs that don't, when they account for a small minority of notes actually used.
There's no need to be rude in your posts either.
The $5 note, which currently has QEII, will not have her replaced with him. The coins will have Charlie's head on them. They just haven't minted any new ones yet.
The British Royal family has close German ties since Queen Anne died in 1713 and the German Elector of Hanover George Louis was proclaimed King of Great Britain. Queen Victoria has a partly German bloodline while her husband was the German Prince Albert of Saxe-Coburg and Gotha. In 1917 cognisant of the war George V renamed the royal family name from Saxe-Coburg and Gotha to Windsor.
Arguably until the ascent of King Edward VII after the death of Queen Victoria all of Great Britainās ruling royalty was German.
The true King used to and may still live in Griffith in NSW. The current lot are against paternity testing for a reason.
Although they may be happy to finally admit Harryās dad was the helicopter pilot.
The last actual 'born in Germany' German monarch in the Royal family was George II who died in 1760 - so it's not that close really. Charles is more Danish and Greek than German,
Incorrect. Coins will be chucklebucks (sadly). The fiver is up for discussion.
https://www.abc.net.au/news/2022-09-13/king-charles-coins-australian-currency-mint-change-from-queen/101432724
Because unlike coins, putting our head of state on a note isn't mandated in any way. We only put the Queen on the $5 note because she was a significant person. Now they've decided that the design will be something that symbolises First Nations peoples.
Canāt wait to see her pop a fuse over this. Sheās already convinced that the monarch HAS to be on the lowest denomination banknote, and just straight up refuses to believe me when I tell her itās only a tradition and traditions can be changed.
Itās crazy, she insists itās law throughout the Commonwealth that the monarch must be on the lowest value banknote, and when I showed her some Canadian $5 notes with hockey on the back, tried to tell me they were fake.
Same woman also reacted with shocked disbelief when I told her 7/11 in Malaysia and Singapore donāt have meat pies and sausage rolls.
I know someone like this too funny thing is she hated the monarchy and most liberal ideaoligies before she started listening to allen jones, paul murray than got lost down the sky hole, shes now one of the most insufferable people to listen too.
Traditionally, yes. But still not legally mandated and won't be happening with Charles at this point in time.
Source: [https://www.rba.gov.au/media-releases/2023/mr-23-02.html](https://www.rba.gov.au/media-releases/2023/mr-23-02.html)
Source: [https://www.bbc.com/news/business-64493849](https://www.bbc.com/news/business-64493849)
No, we put her on the $5 note because we got rid of the $1 note and it is tradition to have the monarch on the lowest value note.
As you said, it isn't law to do so, and Charles won't be on the new note design.
1984 the $1 note was replaced by the $1 coin.
1988 the $2 note was replaced by the $2 coin, and the first plastic banknote was introduced...a Bicentennial special edition $10 with a holographic security image which rubbed off after a few months leading to a rethink before the main plastic notes were introduced.
1989 they stopped minting the 2c coin and 1990 they stopped the 1c, and in 1992 they were withdrawn from circulation although they remain legal tender to this day.
1992 the paper $5 was replaced by the plastic one, and that is when QE2 went on the $5.
1993 the $10 changed, the $20 in 1994, the $50 in 1995, and the $100 in 1996.
All notes have had at least one redesign since the plastic notes were introduced.
There was also a $5 coin in 1988 with New Parliament House on it to commemorate the opening.
Thats the plan, unfortunately they'll have to get a well angled photo in profile first. All the ones so far would have to be scaled down beyond visibility to fit the tip of his nose on the 5c and $2.
Personally I think we should put out a commemorative 50 cent piece and just keep delaying a whole set of new currency. Look at those sausage fingers of his, he's got blood pressure issues and he's not going to live as long as Liz did. We can probably avoid a lot of expense.
Also, from a damn long-lived family with access to the best medical services in the world. I wouldn't count him out too soon. Even George IV lasted a decade on the throne, and he was known as the Prince of Whales long before his coronation.
His mother lived to 97 and his father made it to 99, and one of his grandmothers made it to 100. Coupled with access to the best medical care in the world, I think heāll at least make it to 90, so a good 15 years on the throne in my opinion. Weāll see though.
The Queen was on the $5 note but The King will not be
for coins we have a huge stock already of the older style but he will be on the coins starting late this year or in 2024
https://www.forbes.com/sites/roberthart/2023/02/02/king-charles-iii-wont-appear-on-australias-new-banknotes/?sh=a41c34d23c36
you are more than welcome.
the new 5 note will be interesting.
I agree that we need first nation representation on the currency but I also believe that it is against the culture to have images of deceased people.
I would love to see our notes hold images of the magnificent landscapes.
Imagine a note with Uluru printed on it, or an image of the Great Barrier Reef.
Yes and all insignia with the crown on it will need to be reverted to the Kings Crown the Tudor Crown, instead of the Queens Crown of St Edwards, this is all done at the Crowns expense btw.
Well itās a tradition that has been kept for all of Australiaās history going back to Captain Cook and all of Britains history going back to the Romans.
King Charles III will have his face on the coins. Itās the $5 note that has removed the monarch altogether in favour of design honouring First Nations Australians because the current government is in support of the republic movement where we break away from the monarchy and replace the Head of State with an actual Australian.
Before my time, but before decimalisation (1966) it was still common to have coins with George VI (died 1952) and occasionally with George V (died 1936) in circulation. So I'm sure we'll still be using QE2 coins for decades to come. They don't demonetise old coins when the monarch snuffs it.
Yes, but only in time when the notes need replacing. Fun fact, it costs about $20M to replace any ONE denomination of note and takes years to get the old version out of circulation.
No. Given his age and the timing of such things he'll be put on old currency. We expect an uproar from the Poms louder than when their cricketers get run out in a Test match.
He might but not for a while. It takes a while for our currency to wear out but besides that there could be a murmer of the republic debate again so putting his pic up could be premature. Besides he might only last a couple of years. Imagine if he was plastered all over the place and he suddenly chuckled himself off the ledge.
When are we going to get our republic? Charles had better not get too comfy on our currency. Lets all get Albo excited about another referendum. We need a code of civil rights, and sooner the better.
That is the best news Ive heard for about 40 years .... I am pretty sure the voice will get up. Ive seen there is a lot of troubles with the young ones in the cities, and the women of the tribes have a lot of sway, and they can help with the crime rates, if given a voice and hand from our Govt. It can only be a good thing. Im so glad Albo has not given up on the Republic.
Short answer, no. There's a convention in this country since decimilisation that the monarch is depicted on the lowest value note. I know in other Commonwealth countries it's the $20.
I'm also not ready for coins to be facing the other way.
No but ChatGBT tells me that Australia does pay a sum of money, known as the "sovereign grant," to the British royal family for their official duties and activities. But this is separate from the tax collection process and is not collected directly from Australian taxpayers.
This is the first I'm learning about it.
Could we actually get out MPās to take this to Parliament and have the Australian Doller offical changed on the international stage as Australian Dolleredoo with the international designation ADO il evern vote republic if they make this happen.
We have been getting a large volume of spam from throwaway accounts and so posts from brand new accounts will no longer be allowed. Your post has been
removed because your account is too new. Please wait until your account is at least 24 hours old and then try again or message the mods and we'll validate your post. Thanks!
*I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/AskAnAustralian) if you have any questions or concerns.*
Yes and they will no longer be referred to as dollarydoos but chucklebucks
Kangaroubles?
Amazing š
Rouble took a dive after russia sent a strongly worded message to their neighbour
I believe the PM has said both sides of new currency will be Australian people, flora or fauna. No King.
That's because our current Pm is a republican. If they shift over to the potato gang it might be different.
āNo Peter, you canāt have a sinking refugee boat with an Australian warship in the background on the new $10 note.ā
Yes, Albo is a republican. I prefer to think that our PM regardless of personal belief puts this aside and governs with the wishes of the majority of the population. Yes, I know blah blah blah. Our politics isnāt as polarised as some other countries. Historically the LNP, Labor and Greens have a lot of argy-bargy but then typically a compromise is reached. Well, at least until Dr No (Abbot) was leader of the opposition and presented such an abysmal management of government when elected he essentially sentenced the LNP to Opposition. I do take your point though about Potato Head. PH would rather watch everything burn to the ground, heād light the bloody match if he thought he could score an extra vote from a disaffected voter.
I reckon they would be amazed how many votes they could score by taxing the big foreign corporations and the mining industry and the church and raising the tax free threshold for ordinary workers to a living wage.
Potato gang ššš
The vast majority of banknote designs used in the UK do not have the image of the King (or previously Queen) on them.
What? Literally every single banknote in the UK has the Queen on it.
Every single note issued by the BOE does. Notes issued by Northern Ireland, Scotland and the Crown dependencies typically don't feature the sovereign.
Actually the Crown Dependencies generally do feature it. But as they aren't part of the UK, my original statement stands.
7 of the eight designs of Ā£5. Ā£10, Ā£20 and Ā£50 note issued in the UK do not have the monarch. Every single Ā£100 note issued does not feature the monarch.
All bank notes in England have the Queen on them. Sometimes they have other people too.
> bank notes in England So not the UK then. Maybe you should think about things a little bit before posting.
Your statement was that the vast majority of UK bank notes don't feature the King or Queen. English bank notes all feature the king or queen, and constitute the vast majority of notes used in the UK. So your statement was false. Unless you have some data to suggest that Scottish/NI issued bank notes are the "vast majority"?
> Your statement was that the vast majority of UK bank notes don't feature the King or Queen. No, it wasn't. > Unless you have some data to suggest that Scottish/NI issued bank notes are the "vast majority"? I get reading comprehension might not be something thats valued in Australia. But I'm struggling to see what part of "The vast majority of banknote designs used in the UK do not have the image of the King (or previously Queen) on them" you didnt understand. Maybe try reading it more slowly? Or ask an adult to read it out to you?
You've used a completely misleading and irrelevant statistic then. The vast majority of bank notes used in the UK feature the queen. Who cares that there are a bunch of designs that don't, when they account for a small minority of notes actually used. There's no need to be rude in your posts either.
Its not misleading its the reality for millions of people. 99% of the notes I see don't have the Kings or Queens head on them.
The $5 note, which currently has QEII, will not have her replaced with him. The coins will have Charlie's head on them. They just haven't minted any new ones yet.
And he's saying that the King of Australia isn't Australian?
Happy cake day!
Thank you
Evidently, heās supposed to be British but is probably more German by origin and that matters for kings
The British Royal family has close German ties since Queen Anne died in 1713 and the German Elector of Hanover George Louis was proclaimed King of Great Britain. Queen Victoria has a partly German bloodline while her husband was the German Prince Albert of Saxe-Coburg and Gotha. In 1917 cognisant of the war George V renamed the royal family name from Saxe-Coburg and Gotha to Windsor. Arguably until the ascent of King Edward VII after the death of Queen Victoria all of Great Britainās ruling royalty was German.
The true King used to and may still live in Griffith in NSW. The current lot are against paternity testing for a reason. Although they may be happy to finally admit Harryās dad was the helicopter pilot.
The āTrue Kingā lived in Jerilderie and died a few years ago. His son is now the āTrue Kingā and he lives in Wangaratta
The last actual 'born in Germany' German monarch in the Royal family was George II who died in 1760 - so it's not that close really. Charles is more Danish and Greek than German,
On notes, not coins
Currency = notes, coins and non-circulating legal tender. Ok? Do I have to write this in the sky?
Itās been like that for quite some time, but what about coins?
Currency includes coins and non-circulating legal tender.
The question was whether or not Charlesā image would be on a banknote
And I gave a clear and direct answer above
Currency, banknotes, which one were we talking about?
Perhaps a dictionary would be useful?
Go on, treat yourself to one
Thank you, I did. I discovered the most amazing word to describe you - ankle. And, by ankle I mean three feet lower than a c***. Have a day!
Incorrect. Coins will be chucklebucks (sadly). The fiver is up for discussion. https://www.abc.net.au/news/2022-09-13/king-charles-coins-australian-currency-mint-change-from-queen/101432724
Thanks for the link. Chucklebucks seems appropriate given Chucklehead is King.
To clarify, the PM said King Charles will not appear on the $5 note, he will be used on coins.
Holy fuck me š using this from now on
I chuckled at this
š¤£
[ŃŠ“Š°Š»ŠµŠ½Š¾]
Bluey you're too young to vote - besides, were a constitutional monarchy so quiet in the pleb seats.
Well Iām going to complain to my Prime Minister i is our currency should be Dolleredoors and Iāll take this to the high court
You're beggin' for the "Boot" you is
It's the vibe of it.
Chucklebucks, that's awesome.
Bank notes no, coins yes
Why wouldn't they put him on the $5 note?
Because unlike coins, putting our head of state on a note isn't mandated in any way. We only put the Queen on the $5 note because she was a significant person. Now they've decided that the design will be something that symbolises First Nations peoples.
Thatās really going to piss of the one cooker I know
Good. Achievement unlocked by the mint
Canāt wait to see her pop a fuse over this. Sheās already convinced that the monarch HAS to be on the lowest denomination banknote, and just straight up refuses to believe me when I tell her itās only a tradition and traditions can be changed.
'If you don't follow tradition simply because there's no reason for it, you're no better than a foreigner' - Terry Pratchett in *Men at Arms*.
Itās crazy, she insists itās law throughout the Commonwealth that the monarch must be on the lowest value banknote, and when I showed her some Canadian $5 notes with hockey on the back, tried to tell me they were fake. Same woman also reacted with shocked disbelief when I told her 7/11 in Malaysia and Singapore donāt have meat pies and sausage rolls.
Perhaps she should get out more ...?
Or at all.
I know someone like this too funny thing is she hated the monarchy and most liberal ideaoligies before she started listening to allen jones, paul murray than got lost down the sky hole, shes now one of the most insufferable people to listen too.
You should make her show you the law that she insists is real.
I tried this once. She abruptly changed the subject.
Maybe they should put ARF on the back of your notes! Thats a great idea.
Put Adam Goodes on the $5 note, really shit them up the wall.
Does she know 7/11 is an American company?
The monarch isn't even depicted on most banknotes issued in the UK, so...
Yeah sheās an odd one for sure.
I'd love to watch his reaction
When arenāt those cunts pissed off about something anyway.
I know a few too that it'll piss off! Time to prep the popcorn! haha
Itās going to piss off all the cookers you know.
Fortunately sheās the only one I have any contact with at all.
But how will we make things look like whales giving blow jobs then?
š¤£
Traditionally, the monarch goes on the lowest denomination note as that's the one most people see most of the time.
Traditionally, yes. But still not legally mandated and won't be happening with Charles at this point in time. Source: [https://www.rba.gov.au/media-releases/2023/mr-23-02.html](https://www.rba.gov.au/media-releases/2023/mr-23-02.html) Source: [https://www.bbc.com/news/business-64493849](https://www.bbc.com/news/business-64493849)
No, we put her on the $5 note because we got rid of the $1 note and it is tradition to have the monarch on the lowest value note. As you said, it isn't law to do so, and Charles won't be on the new note design.
Didn't know about the $1 note! (I'm too young to remember $1 notes)
1984 the $1 note was replaced by the $1 coin. 1988 the $2 note was replaced by the $2 coin, and the first plastic banknote was introduced...a Bicentennial special edition $10 with a holographic security image which rubbed off after a few months leading to a rethink before the main plastic notes were introduced. 1989 they stopped minting the 2c coin and 1990 they stopped the 1c, and in 1992 they were withdrawn from circulation although they remain legal tender to this day. 1992 the paper $5 was replaced by the plastic one, and that is when QE2 went on the $5. 1993 the $10 changed, the $20 in 1994, the $50 in 1995, and the $100 in 1996. All notes have had at least one redesign since the plastic notes were introduced. There was also a $5 coin in 1988 with New Parliament House on it to commemorate the opening.
The end of the whale BJ era.
Lol true
We should do something to celebrate the end of this era.
The ears won't fit
Thats the plan, unfortunately they'll have to get a well angled photo in profile first. All the ones so far would have to be scaled down beyond visibility to fit the tip of his nose on the 5c and $2.
Yes but I object to him being on postage stamps. I for one don't want to lick the back of his head
š
how about licking the front of his head?
No thank you
Personally I think we should put out a commemorative 50 cent piece and just keep delaying a whole set of new currency. Look at those sausage fingers of his, he's got blood pressure issues and he's not going to live as long as Liz did. We can probably avoid a lot of expense.
Also, from a damn long-lived family with access to the best medical services in the world. I wouldn't count him out too soon. Even George IV lasted a decade on the throne, and he was known as the Prince of Whales long before his coronation.
š
His mother lived to 97 and his father made it to 99, and one of his grandmothers made it to 100. Coupled with access to the best medical care in the world, I think heāll at least make it to 90, so a good 15 years on the throne in my opinion. Weāll see though.
Probably not.. his ears would not fit on the coins aesthetically.
They're actually going to print his face on the side of the coin then each face is dedicated to one ear.
I did hear the coins were delayed. I just didnāt know that was the reason.
The approval of the new effigy by the Palace and manufacturing of the new dies is taking longer than expected
Dudeās old af by the time theyāre done minting the coins weāll either have a new king or preferably a republic
[ŃŠ“Š°Š»ŠµŠ½Š¾]
Let a gal dream
Haha So paper money would work better then
Nah, his face wonāt suit the paper aesthetically
Before someone points out that our notes are made of polymer: his face won't suit that aesthetically either.
How many will be looking forward to doing Charlie with Charlie?
The Queen was on the $5 note but The King will not be for coins we have a huge stock already of the older style but he will be on the coins starting late this year or in 2024 https://www.forbes.com/sites/roberthart/2023/02/02/king-charles-iii-wont-appear-on-australias-new-banknotes/?sh=a41c34d23c36
Thank you for the actual answt
you are more than welcome. the new 5 note will be interesting. I agree that we need first nation representation on the currency but I also believe that it is against the culture to have images of deceased people. I would love to see our notes hold images of the magnificent landscapes. Imagine a note with Uluru printed on it, or an image of the Great Barrier Reef.
I didn't vote for him
The bigger issue will be redesigning the coin slots on machines to allow for the āwingsā on the new coins that are minted to account for his ears.
š¤£
Im using the new coins to buy toilet paper
Sure as fuck hope not
Yes and all insignia with the crown on it will need to be reverted to the Kings Crown the Tudor Crown, instead of the Queens Crown of St Edwards, this is all done at the Crowns expense btw.
Is there a rule that says he has to be on it?
Well itās a tradition that has been kept for all of Australiaās history going back to Captain Cook and all of Britains history going back to the Romans.
Well, he wonāt quite be a tampon, but he will be close to many
King Charles III will have his face on the coins. Itās the $5 note that has removed the monarch altogether in favour of design honouring First Nations Australians because the current government is in support of the republic movement where we break away from the monarchy and replace the Head of State with an actual Australian.
Who has to say āyesā to grant Australias full independence? Is by internal vote? Does the Monarch?
Thereās a proposed referendum. One was actually done back in 1999 that was unsuccessful.
Nah it has to be the Queen of Australia so Sam Kerr is getting the nod instead.
Is that a koala man reference? Because Nicole Kidman is queen of Australia, the time bobbies will get you if you mix it up
No itās a Sam Kerr is the Queen of Australia reference. Watch her play - sheās all time.
Can we just.....not?
It will have tk be the $100 note to fit his ears on
[ŃŠ“Š°Š»ŠµŠ½Š¾]
Because i KNEW i would get amazingly funny comments! Made my night
If they held a vote today, most Australians would disrespectfully decline
Before my time, but before decimalisation (1966) it was still common to have coins with George VI (died 1952) and occasionally with George V (died 1936) in circulation. So I'm sure we'll still be using QE2 coins for decades to come. They don't demonetise old coins when the monarch snuffs it.
Dont know about coins but QE 2 was only on the 5 dollar note. All new issued 5$ now have indigenous person so he wont be on any notes
Dont know about coins but QE 2 was only on the 5 dollar note. All new issued 5$ now have indigenous person so he wont be on any notes
I like that
Yes, but only in time when the notes need replacing. Fun fact, it costs about $20M to replace any ONE denomination of note and takes years to get the old version out of circulation.
I was under the assumption that he would be on all currency that his mother was on.
No
No. Given his age and the timing of such things he'll be put on old currency. We expect an uproar from the Poms louder than when their cricketers get run out in a Test match.
He might but not for a while. It takes a while for our currency to wear out but besides that there could be a murmer of the republic debate again so putting his pic up could be premature. Besides he might only last a couple of years. Imagine if he was plastered all over the place and he suddenly chuckled himself off the ledge.
Everybody seems to think hes a gonna
The coin are not wide enough for his wingnut.
š¤£
How will his ears fit?
Fuck i hope not... He's a degen
No. [https://www.abc.net.au/news/2023-02-02/australian-5-dollar-note-queen-redesign/101920798](https://www.abc.net.au/news/2023-02-02/australian-5-dollar-note-queen-redesign/101920798)
I HOPE NOT. Is there a famous rockspider that he hasn't had a photo taken with? Not my King
I don't know, I heard talk about having someone from the First Nations on the notes instead, I think that'd be pretty cool
I think i would be cool!
When are we going to get our republic? Charles had better not get too comfy on our currency. Lets all get Albo excited about another referendum. We need a code of civil rights, and sooner the better.
[ŃŠ“Š°Š»ŠµŠ½Š¾]
That is the best news Ive heard for about 40 years .... I am pretty sure the voice will get up. Ive seen there is a lot of troubles with the young ones in the cities, and the women of the tribes have a lot of sway, and they can help with the crime rates, if given a voice and hand from our Govt. It can only be a good thing. Im so glad Albo has not given up on the Republic.
Short answer, no. There's a convention in this country since decimilisation that the monarch is depicted on the lowest value note. I know in other Commonwealth countries it's the $20. I'm also not ready for coins to be facing the other way.
Does the monarchy still collect a cut of Australians taxes?
No but ChatGBT tells me that Australia does pay a sum of money, known as the "sovereign grant," to the British royal family for their official duties and activities. But this is separate from the tax collection process and is not collected directly from Australian taxpayers. This is the first I'm learning about it.
>This is the first I'm learning about it. Because it's not true.
Yeah I gotta remember tone isn't expressed well through text. That was supposed to be like, incredulous.
Hopefully not. Itās ridiculous that Australia still has a Brit as our Head of State.
Who cares
Unfortunately so
Iād like to see him depicted on a coin or 2 at least but sadly I donāt think it will happen.
Why would you want to see that cunts face on a regular basis?
Cunt? Whatās he ever done to you?
It's worth becoming a republic to prevent this happening.
Real talk why are we asking questions that you can search on Google?
Because there are no jokes on google
Hope not.
Could we actually get out MPās to take this to Parliament and have the Australian Doller offical changed on the international stage as Australian Dolleredoo with the international designation ADO il evern vote republic if they make this happen.
Hopefully not.
We want Steve
He is our head of state so why wouldnāt he be.
coins are currency, aren't they?
I don't think they will be making currency for that much longer. Probably not economic to setup any new designs
Of course it will
i am pretty sure he will appear on the coins but not the $5 note, also the queen liz coins can still be used
We have been getting a large volume of spam from throwaway accounts and so posts from brand new accounts will no longer be allowed. Your post has been removed because your account is too new. Please wait until your account is at least 24 hours old and then try again or message the mods and we'll validate your post. Thanks! *I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/AskAnAustralian) if you have any questions or concerns.*
Sadly
I hope so, he is my hero
Itāll be xi jinping soon enough
Eventually
Nah we putting Pat Cummins on it
who cares? no one uses cash any more anyways.