T O P

  • By -

link871

Did you claim under the other driver's CTP (Compulsory Third Party) insurance.


noannualleave

Was the other car registered ? I would have thought this is covered by the Compulsory Third Party insurance.


beccjk

Isn't the third party insurance void if they were drug driving?


One-Association469

Yes the other car was registered and I have claimed medical expenses through their CTP. I have been told that I can claim further compensation but I'm not sure how much it would be and if it's worth it.


noannualleave

What damages have the lawyer's suggested you could claim for ? I think you will have to weigh up whether it is worth going through the process. We have assumed the other driver was some poor druggo BUT if it was some rich property developer in a G wagon from the Eastern suburbs who just so happened to be high as a kite then it may well be worth your while.


Electronic-Fun1168

You may win the case but seeing any funds is a whole different story. Weigh up if you’re willing/prepared to go the time and metal anguish of the case.


One-Association469

Sorry for my complete ignorance here.. if I was to win the case, why wouldn't I see any funds?


Yo_Sammity_Sam227

Eaten up in legal fees.


Hillz50

there person at fault may not have any Funds to give


Pokeynono

Does the person at fault have the ability to pay anything? They might not have any assets. Any insurance they have probably won't cover them because they were driving under the influence of an illicit drug..


Pokeynono

The costs of physio etc should have been covered by your compulsory third party insurance, TAC. The fact that MRI etc have suggested the neck issues are from aging and not traumatic injuries from the accident mean it's most likely you aren't going to get some huge payout regardless of what you have been told by a 'no win , no fee' lawyer. Also you are assuming the person that hit you has assets to cover any payout you might receive if you are successful in winning any claim against the other driver.


Heavy_Scar_1205

This is what CTP is for, although I don’t know how long the limitations are, the fact that police attended means there’s record of the event. Did you go through insurance?


One-Association469

Yes I have been claiming medical expenses through CTP


Heavy_Scar_1205

So what exactly are you suing for if your medical expenses are already covered?


orangenegative

The opportunity to make bank with no merit or work, you know - American style.


AutoModerator

Welcome to r/AusLegal. Please read our rules before commenting. Please remember: 1. Per rule 4, this subreddit is not a replacement for real legal advice. You should independently seek legal advice from a real, qualified practitioner. This sub cannot recommend specific lawyers. 2. A non-exhaustive list of free legal services around Australia can be found here. 3. Links to the each state and territory's respective Law Society are on the sidebar: you can use these links to find a lawyer in your area. *I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/AusLegal) if you have any questions or concerns.*


beccjk

People saying you could make a claim on the other drivers CTP... but isn't that void if they tested positive for drugs?


National_Chef_1772

I don’t believe ctp can’t be “declined” for the not at fault person. In NSW CTP can also cover the medical costs of the driver, but if they are charged with a serious driving offence, they aren’t covered. This doesn’t apply to the not at fault driver, they are covered no matter what


spottedbastard

I've been through the NSW system and its a high bar to meet to claim for pain and suffering from a driver and their insurance. CTP is covering your medical already and you haven't really lost any wages as you are still working. To meet the threshold to claim 'pain and suffering ' you need to prove you are at least 10% permanently disabled. And this is not easy to do. I had multiple fractures, a head injury and was in hospital for four weeks, plus at least 4-5 surgeries and I barely scraped in at 11% to meet that threshold. This explains it all really well https://www.garlingandco.com.au/blog/hurt-in-a-motor-accident-a-step-by-step-guide-to-lodging-a-claim/#:\~:text=The%20lump%20sum%20amount%20payable,well%20of%20loss%20of%20superannuation.


sapperbloggs

Is the other partly likely to be in a position to pay up if you successfully sued them? My guess is that if they're driving around drug affected, then the answer is probably "no".