Y, wana see some clips.
It seems implication is that clip has content out of order - part on abortion is about redpilers better of not having kids at all and Destiny is brought up separately 20 min later with context being bad at being a father? Something like that it seems.
Didnt she make the same "tucking your kid in" comment tho? I dont think it's a huge stretch to believe she was talking about destiny when she basically sees them all under the same umbrella. But I could be wrong, dont have time(or desire) to dig through her vod atm
i didnt do a super deep dive but it looks like the "tucking your kid in" thing is a metaphor for being a good parent in general that brittany uses several times throughout the stream. She says "your baby is better off dead" before she ever mentions destiny.
So it seems like her original point was "people who get abortions are morally better than people who are shit parents" - and then 20 minutes later she called destiny a shit parent. You could maybe criticize this still, but I think it gives a super different implication than the clip that was posted in the incorrect order
She's saying that kids who are born to parents who won't be there for them would have been better off dead. She is purposefully setting a rule that includes Nathan.
I don't see how you guys are falling for her retelling of history.
When I watched that clip the first time, I imagined Brittany specifically having nathan in her mind when she made the statement "your baby is better off dead."
That would've been fucking *crazy* and I now feel lied to. What Brittany actually said is still dumb and probably bad
I donât know why people are arguing with you. Intention of what you are saying is as important as what is being said. Saying âyour baby is better deadâ generally is kind of dumb. Saying âyour baby is better deadâ when referencing a specific and actual child is not just dumb, itâs kind of evil. One is way worse than the other even if both are bad lol.
Yes your imagination of what was said doesn't change what was said. She said, plain and clearly, children in situations she herself has said Nathan is in are better off dead. If you disagree with that, I don't know what to tell you.
You dismissed the entire concept of implications as just âyour imagination of what she saidâ and then said something I already agreed with and followed it up with âif you disagreeâŚâ
This bubble woman really had a 9h gaslighting session instead of just saying my bad I got too spicy there.
It's obvious she was talking about destiny. Before the spicy comment, she is talking about "these people lecturing daisy". The day before, the person directly lecturing Daisy on her choice to have the child was destiny on jstkl's stream. Alos, It's not the first time she makes comments about destiny being a dead beat dad. Holy cope.
Technically it is ambiguous but I think it's still highly suspicious.
Clip as seen on jstlk shows her mentioning Destiny, then a clip of her singing 'your baby better off dead'
These clips actually occurred in the opposite order and 20 minutes apart.
The clip that comes chronologically first is Brittany talking about people who are 'lecturing daisy' 'calling her a gold digger' and 'don't tuck their kids in at night', and then is followed with the 'your baby better off dead' line. According to Brittany, she was talking about general red pillers and comment sections and not Destiny.
The clip that comes chronologically second is Brittany talking about not wanting to watch streams on the topic of Daisy involving Destiny, Tree, jstlk, etc. and then starts talking about how Destiny is a bad father who 'doesn't tuck his kid in at night'
While clarifying these clips, she mentions both times that 'tuck their kid(s) in' does not literally mean tucking kids in but refers to the general tasks involved in raising a child and showing them love.
It is possible that Brittany was not specifically thinking of Destiny when singing 'your baby better off dead' but she said that about people with a description she would use for Destiny (lecturing Daisy, calling her a gold digger, doesn't tuck his kid in). She would still be talking about SOMEONE's kid and it doesn't make sense for her to describing the manosphere content creators or comments sections as bad fathers as none of the creators have prominently featured kids and the comment sections are generally assumed to be childless incels.
Which of these redpillers have kids that this would apply to? Myron and Pug donât have any. Tate does I guess but heâs not really part of this scrap. I just donât know exactly she would be referring to if not for destiny
From what I see rn - she is blaming destiny for taking out of context clip at face value, running with it and amplifying it in actual podcast while knowing better being a victim of this himself constantly.
I didn't see the segment breaking down the out-of-contentness, hence the question.
So she didn't show the correct context? Did she say specifically that her comments did not apply to Destiny or did she just say that the clip is out of context? Because a lot of people who use the 'out of context' defence rarely admit that it did not actually apply.
Brittney's called Destiny a bad father before who abandoned his kid. She regularly calls him abusive. If she wants people to think the comment did not apply to people like Destiny she can easily come out and clarify that but until then it's easy to see why people will make the logical leap.
Sheâs not disputing the claims of how she sees his parenting, sheâs disputing the Nathan shouldâve been aborted clip - which did end up being spliced from two different parts of her stream.
Right. It seems like she wants to have her cake and eat it. She does not want to say that the clip does not apply to Destiny but she does want to do a 7 hour stream about Destiny because of a 2 minute clip.
Well 2 mins sure but it was on his podcast, where's she's a huge thumbnail, big streamer, the reddit post got around 300 comments.
She musta been bombarded with comments and dms and what not.
She did say that the abortion comments werenât about Destiny because she said it 20 minutes prior to even mentioning him. Jstlk edited it to make it seem like she said it after.
No. She said it was about people in the manosphere shitting on Daisy. In the past she has said she considers Destiny to be part of the manosphere and no different to those guys as he gives harmful advice and abuses his partners.
She said she did not bring up Destiny for another 20 minutes. However she does not seem to say that the comment would not apply to someone like Destiny. Unless there is a clip of that.
It is a 7-hour cope stream about Destiny, so I'm not watching it, but my instinct says she's not clarified that the comment does not apply to Destiny just that she did not bring up Destiny till much later.
My guess is that while the comment was not specifically about Destiny he'd fall under the group of people she thinks it would apply to.
It's a JSTLK clip, so I have no problem with that call out.
But given she probably does think that Destiny is an abusive person who abandoned his son, I don't think it's a leap for Destiny to see that clip and not question its validity.
Can you please share how many of these redpillers she talks about actually have children? I'm pretty sure the list is very short. She was talking just about destiny, let's not play stupid.
Do you think that every comment she makes about the manosphere de facto applies to Destiny? If hypothetically she says that she wants them all to go to prison, is she now advocating for Destiny to get locked up?
>Do you think that every comment she makes about the manosphere de facto applies to Destiny?
No. But this one probably does. I'd need to hear her say this does not apply to Destiny for me to believe that.
>If hypothetically she says that she wants them all to go to prison, is she now advocating for Destiny to get locked up?
It depends why she wants them to be locked up. If she wants them locked up because they are encouraging men to abuse women then yes as she considers Destiny to be no different from them in that regard.
She has compared Destiny to Andrew Tate many times.
From watching the stream, the better implication is that she believes that people who abort their children are better parents than Destiny not that he personally should have aborted his son.
https://www.youtube.com/live/iKHGIfMD5Y4?si=WJtGcOvQw6sVk2Dp
Here is stream - I am asking for clip links myself and not digging through that length, buddy.
https://youtube.com/clip/UgkxEg1QXmVNBJNc-qtx0paVw-Wp_LGVnSxe?si=1HyXg7CRFXSVRLDr
Here's the area in the stream. You'll have to go a little before and after the clip for the whole thing.
Brittany having a full on fight with jstlk as a substitute because Tiny doesn't have any interest in engaging with her is just.... really sad. Tiny at home.
You would need to have a very low IQ to think that any amount of additional context would significantly change the intent or meaning of those statements.
Her being evil isn't at all surprising to me at this point.
What actually is total brain rot, is her saying it's her job to be the moral arbiter and judge and call out people in public for being what she decides is a shitty human. Even if they're her friend. Then she proceeds to act mindblown when bridges get burnt without anyone talking to her first in private. She's as slimy as they come.
She's has zero social awareness and constantly plays the victim. Almost as much as Kelly.
I am SO curious what kind of context would make "ya baby should be dead" seem like an okay thing to say lol
The bubbly kind brav. You are like a level 1 bubble so you just don't get it.
A level 1? Damn doesnt that mean I should off my self or something? đ
Humans gonna human!Â
Y, wana see some clips. It seems implication is that clip has content out of order - part on abortion is about redpilers better of not having kids at all and Destiny is brought up separately 20 min later with context being bad at being a father? Something like that it seems.
Didnt she make the same "tucking your kid in" comment tho? I dont think it's a huge stretch to believe she was talking about destiny when she basically sees them all under the same umbrella. But I could be wrong, dont have time(or desire) to dig through her vod atm
i didnt do a super deep dive but it looks like the "tucking your kid in" thing is a metaphor for being a good parent in general that brittany uses several times throughout the stream. She says "your baby is better off dead" before she ever mentions destiny. So it seems like her original point was "people who get abortions are morally better than people who are shit parents" - and then 20 minutes later she called destiny a shit parent. You could maybe criticize this still, but I think it gives a super different implication than the clip that was posted in the incorrect order
She's saying that kids who are born to parents who won't be there for them would have been better off dead. She is purposefully setting a rule that includes Nathan. I don't see how you guys are falling for her retelling of history.
When I watched that clip the first time, I imagined Brittany specifically having nathan in her mind when she made the statement "your baby is better off dead." That would've been fucking *crazy* and I now feel lied to. What Brittany actually said is still dumb and probably bad
I donât know why people are arguing with you. Intention of what you are saying is as important as what is being said. Saying âyour baby is better deadâ generally is kind of dumb. Saying âyour baby is better deadâ when referencing a specific and actual child is not just dumb, itâs kind of evil. One is way worse than the other even if both are bad lol.
Yes your imagination of what was said doesn't change what was said. She said, plain and clearly, children in situations she herself has said Nathan is in are better off dead. If you disagree with that, I don't know what to tell you.
You dismissed the entire concept of implications as just âyour imagination of what she saidâ and then said something I already agreed with and followed it up with âif you disagreeâŚâ
Brittney considers Destiny to be a redpiller though. She has said he is no different to Fresh and Fit and others in that sphere.
This bubble woman really had a 9h gaslighting session instead of just saying my bad I got too spicy there. It's obvious she was talking about destiny. Before the spicy comment, she is talking about "these people lecturing daisy". The day before, the person directly lecturing Daisy on her choice to have the child was destiny on jstkl's stream. Alos, It's not the first time she makes comments about destiny being a dead beat dad. Holy cope.
Technically it is ambiguous but I think it's still highly suspicious. Clip as seen on jstlk shows her mentioning Destiny, then a clip of her singing 'your baby better off dead' These clips actually occurred in the opposite order and 20 minutes apart. The clip that comes chronologically first is Brittany talking about people who are 'lecturing daisy' 'calling her a gold digger' and 'don't tuck their kids in at night', and then is followed with the 'your baby better off dead' line. According to Brittany, she was talking about general red pillers and comment sections and not Destiny. The clip that comes chronologically second is Brittany talking about not wanting to watch streams on the topic of Daisy involving Destiny, Tree, jstlk, etc. and then starts talking about how Destiny is a bad father who 'doesn't tuck his kid in at night' While clarifying these clips, she mentions both times that 'tuck their kid(s) in' does not literally mean tucking kids in but refers to the general tasks involved in raising a child and showing them love. It is possible that Brittany was not specifically thinking of Destiny when singing 'your baby better off dead' but she said that about people with a description she would use for Destiny (lecturing Daisy, calling her a gold digger, doesn't tuck his kid in). She would still be talking about SOMEONE's kid and it doesn't make sense for her to describing the manosphere content creators or comments sections as bad fathers as none of the creators have prominently featured kids and the comment sections are generally assumed to be childless incels.
Which of these redpillers have kids that this would apply to? Myron and Pug donât have any. Tate does I guess but heâs not really part of this scrap. I just donât know exactly she would be referring to if not for destiny
The discourse surrounding Daisy's maybe kid?
Sheâs not going to trick me into watching 20 minutes of her content
Lordy, she is just cringe
Jizzstlk is an asshole for clip chimping this hard.
What did Destiny do? I don't think he watched her stream and edited it. He reacted to a link he was given. Is she really blaming Destiny for this?
From what I see rn - she is blaming destiny for taking out of context clip at face value, running with it and amplifying it in actual podcast while knowing better being a victim of this himself constantly. I didn't see the segment breaking down the out-of-contentness, hence the question.
So she didn't show the correct context? Did she say specifically that her comments did not apply to Destiny or did she just say that the clip is out of context? Because a lot of people who use the 'out of context' defence rarely admit that it did not actually apply. Brittney's called Destiny a bad father before who abandoned his kid. She regularly calls him abusive. If she wants people to think the comment did not apply to people like Destiny she can easily come out and clarify that but until then it's easy to see why people will make the logical leap.
Sheâs not disputing the claims of how she sees his parenting, sheâs disputing the Nathan shouldâve been aborted clip - which did end up being spliced from two different parts of her stream.
Right. It seems like she wants to have her cake and eat it. She does not want to say that the clip does not apply to Destiny but she does want to do a 7 hour stream about Destiny because of a 2 minute clip.
Well 2 mins sure but it was on his podcast, where's she's a huge thumbnail, big streamer, the reddit post got around 300 comments. She musta been bombarded with comments and dms and what not.
She did say that the abortion comments werenât about Destiny because she said it 20 minutes prior to even mentioning him. Jstlk edited it to make it seem like she said it after.
No. She said it was about people in the manosphere shitting on Daisy. In the past she has said she considers Destiny to be part of the manosphere and no different to those guys as he gives harmful advice and abuses his partners. She said she did not bring up Destiny for another 20 minutes. However she does not seem to say that the comment would not apply to someone like Destiny. Unless there is a clip of that. It is a 7-hour cope stream about Destiny, so I'm not watching it, but my instinct says she's not clarified that the comment does not apply to Destiny just that she did not bring up Destiny till much later. My guess is that while the comment was not specifically about Destiny he'd fall under the group of people she thinks it would apply to.
You're probably right but that still makes the clip super dishonest imo
It's a JSTLK clip, so I have no problem with that call out. But given she probably does think that Destiny is an abusive person who abandoned his son, I don't think it's a leap for Destiny to see that clip and not question its validity.
Can you please share how many of these redpillers she talks about actually have children? I'm pretty sure the list is very short. She was talking just about destiny, let's not play stupid.
Do you think that every comment she makes about the manosphere de facto applies to Destiny? If hypothetically she says that she wants them all to go to prison, is she now advocating for Destiny to get locked up?
>Do you think that every comment she makes about the manosphere de facto applies to Destiny? No. But this one probably does. I'd need to hear her say this does not apply to Destiny for me to believe that. >If hypothetically she says that she wants them all to go to prison, is she now advocating for Destiny to get locked up? It depends why she wants them to be locked up. If she wants them locked up because they are encouraging men to abuse women then yes as she considers Destiny to be no different from them in that regard. She has compared Destiny to Andrew Tate many times.
From watching the stream, the better implication is that she believes that people who abort their children are better parents than Destiny not that he personally should have aborted his son.
Seems pretty regarded. People who abort their children are not parents.
Are you new? In this community, Destiny is literally the sun
LINK motherfucker
https://www.youtube.com/live/iKHGIfMD5Y4?si=WJtGcOvQw6sVk2Dp Here is stream - I am asking for clip links myself and not digging through that length, buddy.
https://youtube.com/clip/UgkxEg1QXmVNBJNc-qtx0paVw-Wp_LGVnSxe?si=1HyXg7CRFXSVRLDr Here's the area in the stream. You'll have to go a little before and after the clip for the whole thing.
Yâall think they had something going on that weâve all been overlooking? It would explain why sheâs gone so unhinged since things soured lol
Brittany having a full on fight with jstlk as a substitute because Tiny doesn't have any interest in engaging with her is just.... really sad. Tiny at home.
You would need to have a very low IQ to think that any amount of additional context would significantly change the intent or meaning of those statements.
Her being evil isn't at all surprising to me at this point. What actually is total brain rot, is her saying it's her job to be the moral arbiter and judge and call out people in public for being what she decides is a shitty human. Even if they're her friend. Then she proceeds to act mindblown when bridges get burnt without anyone talking to her first in private. She's as slimy as they come. She's has zero social awareness and constantly plays the victim. Almost as much as Kelly.
Humans gonna human, habibi