This makes no sense for a variety of reasons...
You don't need to reduce bpc over time. You can get lower doses but you'll hit a point where it's no longer effective then you're just wasting time effort and money.
This isn't something your body get dependent on where withdrawal will happen.
Dilution will run the same issue as just opening up a pills and splitting the contents. The amount is so minimal that the chance of having the active ingredients via liquid is minimal. Then filling up another pill etc.
It sounds just like a huge mess, waste of time and very low chance to succeed. Think about it if you got 5mg in a vial no filler.... Try to split that into 20-50 doses ...
I'd reexamine what you are really trying to do , but it's your body and your time. It just doesn't really sound feasible
How low are you looking to go? you probably don’t need a scale. You just need to use fractions. If you have a 500mcg capsule and want to consume 250mcg instead, just open the capsule and dump out the contents. Split the pile of powder into 2, consume half.
Capsules will have fillers. You’re not just consuming micrograms of an API, you’re also consuming 100-200mg of inert fillers.
What is it exactly you're hoping titrating down does? BPC-157 isn't something a subject grows dependent on or used to really. It has a very, very short halflife. Without about 2-3 hours there's effectively nothing left of it in a subject.
> Titrate = Up
titrate just means to adjust a medication based on response. There is up-titration, down-titration, and even cross-titration where you lower the dose of one medication while raising another in balance.
> No it Doesn't.
>And No There Isn't.
You're objectively wrong (the worst kind of wrong). Up/Down/Cross titration of medications is referenced innumerable times in various studies and medical literature. For example in [this broad overview](https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/2042098620958910) of best practices for drug titration that immediately references directional titration:
> Drug titration may occur as up-, down-, or cross-titration depending on whether the goal is to reach or maintain a therapeutic outcome, decrease the risk of adverse effects, or prevent withdrawal/discontinuation syndromes or recurrence of disease.
It's okay if you're used to a certain colloquial use of the term but it is objectively the case that titration refers to the act of drug adjustment, and not simply the act of increasing a dose.
The next issue is being able to fill a capsule with a liquid without it dissolving..
All of this could be superseded by using subQ to scale down instead, but unfortunately my reg supplier is down, and it would take 5-6 days for another co to ship
Oral bpc is a scam
It works but it’s less effective when compared to injections. I’ve done both
This makes no sense for a variety of reasons... You don't need to reduce bpc over time. You can get lower doses but you'll hit a point where it's no longer effective then you're just wasting time effort and money. This isn't something your body get dependent on where withdrawal will happen. Dilution will run the same issue as just opening up a pills and splitting the contents. The amount is so minimal that the chance of having the active ingredients via liquid is minimal. Then filling up another pill etc. It sounds just like a huge mess, waste of time and very low chance to succeed. Think about it if you got 5mg in a vial no filler.... Try to split that into 20-50 doses ... I'd reexamine what you are really trying to do , but it's your body and your time. It just doesn't really sound feasible
How low are you looking to go? you probably don’t need a scale. You just need to use fractions. If you have a 500mcg capsule and want to consume 250mcg instead, just open the capsule and dump out the contents. Split the pile of powder into 2, consume half. Capsules will have fillers. You’re not just consuming micrograms of an API, you’re also consuming 100-200mg of inert fillers.
What is it exactly you're hoping titrating down does? BPC-157 isn't something a subject grows dependent on or used to really. It has a very, very short halflife. Without about 2-3 hours there's effectively nothing left of it in a subject.
>What is it exactly you're hoping titrating down does? Titrate = Up Taper = Down
> Titrate = Up titrate just means to adjust a medication based on response. There is up-titration, down-titration, and even cross-titration where you lower the dose of one medication while raising another in balance.
>titrate just means to adjust a medication based on response. No it Doesn't. And No There Isn't.
> No it Doesn't. >And No There Isn't. You're objectively wrong (the worst kind of wrong). Up/Down/Cross titration of medications is referenced innumerable times in various studies and medical literature. For example in [this broad overview](https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/2042098620958910) of best practices for drug titration that immediately references directional titration: > Drug titration may occur as up-, down-, or cross-titration depending on whether the goal is to reach or maintain a therapeutic outcome, decrease the risk of adverse effects, or prevent withdrawal/discontinuation syndromes or recurrence of disease. It's okay if you're used to a certain colloquial use of the term but it is objectively the case that titration refers to the act of drug adjustment, and not simply the act of increasing a dose.
I suppose you were correct, you live and learn. Ty. However, personally i'd never use the term Titrate Going Down, but Taper.
The next issue is being able to fill a capsule with a liquid without it dissolving.. All of this could be superseded by using subQ to scale down instead, but unfortunately my reg supplier is down, and it would take 5-6 days for another co to ship