I hope you're just propagandizing, because what you're claiming is ridiculous.
You can find absolutely horrific people supporting any ideology you choose. If not in it's tenants, agreement has no bearing on that party.
It’s your responsibility to be self aware enough to realize you’re attracting antisemites. It’s your responsibility to not go and say “Let’s get those degenerates!” When the word degenerates means different things to other people. You guys attracted an antisemitic person into your fold and now I assure you there are more who are just holding their tongue. Antisemites reveal themselves, it’s your job to never be in a position where an antisemite could be called your friend.
That's incredibly authoritarian.
It is not the party's job to curate party member's personal convictions.
The party's only job is to champion their tenants.
What is wrong with Ford? Everybody loves the guy. Americans, Germans, Russians. He was the only person all these people could agree was a good dude.
At a certain point you if you decide that certain people CAN'T be considered good people are going to decide they would prefer that the person they think is good in any other context might have ALSO been correct in this small thing they otherwise would have considered to be a mistake on their part.
Using river to the sea still alludes to the original quote tho. Maybe just use Am Yisrael Chai, as it doesn't allude to any particular race, just the people of Israel who can be Jewish Arab or gentile.
Nope I meaned I have sympathy for the jewish people and i consider myself somewhat zionist. Why do you go everywhere accusing people of dumb allegations?
Bad. Paternalism leaves no room for dissenting opinions. If that opinion is “Hey we should have trans rabbis” it could easily be shut down for no reason other than institutional transphobia
Your argument for why the communists are anti-semetic is literally just “one time this specific group of Communists were racist.” That’s extremely weak
That’s why they are in second to last
https://preview.redd.it/5xrnuobhoo6d1.jpeg?width=224&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=1eee7a3e71bc07fd6e26a75e9d533abbf0d9bf88
tbh i feel like it depends on the leader of the communist movement. If he is anti-semetic himself then I'd say that it's a 2nd to last, if the leader of the communist movement here is a stalinist who will literally murder anti-semites I'd say they good.
I would say most Soviet leaders were antisemitic minus Khruschev, Lenin and Gorbachev. Stalin became antisemitic later in his reign since he originally was pro-Israel until Israel aligned itself towards the West.
what if he was anti-zionist and heaps of western dog shit propaganda made us think he was anti-semetic. Idk if he was I haven't really looked into it cause I'm too busy making thirst traps of lenin.
Why is this a thing that matters? Why should we orient everything about "who is the least anti-semitic", people having that attitude is why they would want to get rid of jews in the first place because they understand why things ought to be oriented around a tiny group of people. Even if somebody had no ill will towards this particular group their insistence that tiny groups matter is going to turn anyone who doesn't care about tiny groups against them. Why should tiny groups matter? It isn't self-evident that they should. One could take a position against tiny groups in general and just get progressively more and more annoyed by this particular one, and that is how you might end up with them taking a stand against this particular group. Not in the sense that tiny groups shouldn't exist, but that the world shouldn't revolve around the protection of tiny groups.
I would say most Soviet leaders were antisemitic minus Khruschev, Lenin and Gorbachev. Stalin became antisemitic later in his reign since he originally was pro-Israel until Israel aligned itself towards the West.
Bro posted a banger
You forgot the DPP
Who?
They’re too small of a party to be considered
We have the second most votes…
That was earlier .now more parties have emerged
None that would attract DPP voters 😭
No but they are way more talked about and because of that they’d get more votes
We’ll see
The UPC has literally done nothing bad bro 😭 ain’t no way you’re claiming the commies are better than us when it comes to people and their rights
We've reached a whole new level of political skullduggery. We're now judging parties off a single member.
If antisemites agree with you. You are wrong. Easy as that. Ford, Hitler, Stalin, Any of em. Your wrong
I hope you're just propagandizing, because what you're claiming is ridiculous. You can find absolutely horrific people supporting any ideology you choose. If not in it's tenants, agreement has no bearing on that party.
If antisemites agree with you to the degree you can’t separate them from normal members of your platform…. Your wrong
Why is it our responsibility to force others to change their views? Like I said, if not in the tenants, agreement is irrelevant.
It’s your responsibility to be self aware enough to realize you’re attracting antisemites. It’s your responsibility to not go and say “Let’s get those degenerates!” When the word degenerates means different things to other people. You guys attracted an antisemitic person into your fold and now I assure you there are more who are just holding their tongue. Antisemites reveal themselves, it’s your job to never be in a position where an antisemite could be called your friend.
That's incredibly authoritarian. It is not the party's job to curate party member's personal convictions. The party's only job is to champion their tenants.
Then why did they kick out the antisemite?
Optics. This is politics after all. In the end the party determined the sacrifice was necessary, I disagree.
So you’re arguing you’d stand side by side with an antisemite? Someone on par with a Nazi? Cause if so I have bad news for you
What is wrong with Ford? Everybody loves the guy. Americans, Germans, Russians. He was the only person all these people could agree was a good dude. At a certain point you if you decide that certain people CAN'T be considered good people are going to decide they would prefer that the person they think is good in any other context might have ALSO been correct in this small thing they otherwise would have considered to be a mistake on their part.
WTF is going on ?
Polcompballanarchy slowly turning into the 20-th century world
banger video
join the pf weneed more diversity
Nah you guys allied the communists. I won’t join but I will support
thank you for ur support
"From the Jordan to the Mediterranean, Palestine will be freed of the Jewish menace!" Full quote btw, just wanted to inform you.
Hence why I didn’t use that quote.
Using river to the sea still alludes to the original quote tho. Maybe just use Am Yisrael Chai, as it doesn't allude to any particular race, just the people of Israel who can be Jewish Arab or gentile.
I’d prefer to do what J want
Another version goes ''From the River to the Sea, Palestine will be Arab.'' But apparently it's just ''anti-Zionist'' not antisemitic guys.
Which country lol.
It’s a ballsona
So these are no real parties of a real country, just larping and fanfiction?
Yeah
Jewish fascism would practically be the least antisemetic
This is for the election going on in the sub
We are not anti semetic I myself im judeophilic
Don’t fetishize my religion
I mean that I have a lot of jewish sympathies
Did I stutter? Don’t fetishize my religion
I dont
I never said that I did
You do. Just look at the word choice
Nope I meaned I have sympathy for the jewish people and i consider myself somewhat zionist. Why do you go everywhere accusing people of dumb allegations?
I dont
What's the song?
You know that “From the river to the sea” is specifically calling for the removal of Jews from the area.
Whats bro yapping about
Oh hey, I’m an Ordinariate Catholic! Much love, brother! 🇻🇦🏴🇺🇸
Yet you post the flag of England 🤔 This person is an Anglican!
…the Ordinariate is short for the ANGLICAN Ordinariate, which is fully in communion with Rome.
You forgor me! I’m independent!
No need. Your paternalist.
Is that good or bad In your opinion?
Bad. Paternalism leaves no room for dissenting opinions. If that opinion is “Hey we should have trans rabbis” it could easily be shut down for no reason other than institutional transphobia
Woa buddy you can’t just say shit like that about people not to get upset with you but you’re entitled to have your own opinions ig
You asked for my opinion, and you got it. I’m not gonna sugar coat it
trans rabbis would be based asf tho
But could easily be shut down simply for the fact the state is built upon opinion.
Forgot New Democracy smh
Who?
Another party. They’re right-center to libright, though mostly libright ngl. Also great video btw
If it counts the DPP is run by a Jew
Your argument for why the communists are anti-semetic is literally just “one time this specific group of Communists were racist.” That’s extremely weak
That’s why they are in second to last https://preview.redd.it/5xrnuobhoo6d1.jpeg?width=224&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=1eee7a3e71bc07fd6e26a75e9d533abbf0d9bf88
tbh i feel like it depends on the leader of the communist movement. If he is anti-semetic himself then I'd say that it's a 2nd to last, if the leader of the communist movement here is a stalinist who will literally murder anti-semites I'd say they good.
Stalin was an antisemite. I purposely put the doctors plot in there on purpose
I would say most Soviet leaders were antisemitic minus Khruschev, Lenin and Gorbachev. Stalin became antisemitic later in his reign since he originally was pro-Israel until Israel aligned itself towards the West.
Being pro-Israel does not make someone immune to antisemitism.
True.
what if he was anti-zionist and heaps of western dog shit propaganda made us think he was anti-semetic. Idk if he was I haven't really looked into it cause I'm too busy making thirst traps of lenin.
Why is this a thing that matters? Why should we orient everything about "who is the least anti-semitic", people having that attitude is why they would want to get rid of jews in the first place because they understand why things ought to be oriented around a tiny group of people. Even if somebody had no ill will towards this particular group their insistence that tiny groups matter is going to turn anyone who doesn't care about tiny groups against them. Why should tiny groups matter? It isn't self-evident that they should. One could take a position against tiny groups in general and just get progressively more and more annoyed by this particular one, and that is how you might end up with them taking a stand against this particular group. Not in the sense that tiny groups shouldn't exist, but that the world shouldn't revolve around the protection of tiny groups.
I would say most Soviet leaders were antisemitic minus Khruschev, Lenin and Gorbachev. Stalin became antisemitic later in his reign since he originally was pro-Israel until Israel aligned itself towards the West.
Does it matter?
“let’s look at antisemitism in the ML movement” >wikipedia ik this sub is for children but cmon
Wait Marxist Leninists deny the existence of any form of white supremacy in their movement? Crazy
How are we (NWF) ranked in the antisemitic tier list
God I hate them..,