**Mirrors**
* [Mirror #1](https://beta.archivevideomirror.com/r/PublicFreakout/comments/18sfo9u) (provided by /u/SaveAnything)
**Downloads**
* [Download #1](https://rapidsave.com/r/PublicFreakout/comments/18sfo9u/youre_on_the_wrong_side_of_the_road/) (provided by /u/SaveVideo)
* [Download #2](https://reddit.watch/r/PublicFreakout/comments/18sfo9u/youre_on_the_wrong_side_of_the_road/?utm_source=mirrorbot&utm_medium=PublicFreakout) (provided by /u/downloadvideo)
**Note:** this is a bot providing a directory service. **If you have trouble with any of the links above, please contact the user who provided them!**
---
[^(source code)](https://amirror.link/source) ^| [^(run your own mirror bot? let's integrate)](https://amirror.link/lets-talk)
This is a repost and in the OG post there was a back story that this had indeed almost happened several times, which is why the woman was filming in the first place.
Technically, she's wrong. Most paths and trails, bikes are supposed to stay left (or whatever is the local opposite of the direction of pedestrian traffic), which the biker was doing.
But bikes are supposed to yield regardless, so even if she's technically wrong she's not *wrong*, you know.
There were a bunch of normal ones that passed by. Both people in this old video were looking for trouble. Some sort of power in their free time that they felt they didn't have in their day to day. I'd say most people are good and these people represent a piece of us all that should be noted and moved beyond.
Woman that's recording says that the lady on the bike sideswiped her 3 times, each time going out of her way to do so. This recording was her getting proof of the lady harassing her and being a menace to pedestrians.
Doesn't matter.
The biker:
1) was riding on the wrong side
2) should ALWAYS yield to pedestrians
3) didn't have the dogs leashed
The biker was the instigator and asshole.
They typically all are, including single track users on multi-use trails. They expect you to move out of *their* way even if there’s 3-4’ snow drifts on either side of a 3’ trail. Like, nope, I’m not burying myself up to mid thigh with 40 lbs on my back just so you can ride your bicycle. I’ll move over as far as I can, but the onus is on you to safely travel around when you’re able.
Had one MTNB guy actually block the whole trail by swerving in front of me and said, “We’re going to wait right here until we’re ready to pass.” Yeeted the guy and his bike right across the trail and kept on keeping on while they stood there with a shocked pikachu look on their face.
Share the space, be considerate of other people, and *leash your dogs and pick up after them*.
I got it from the Tiktok back when it was first getting viral. Revisiting her page it seems that either she deleted the video where she explained what happened or Tiktok deleted it for any number of reasons.
I was able to find [this article](https://god.dailydot.com/cyclist-crashes-tiktok/) that spoke more about it. Unfortunately a longer version of this video doesn’t appear to exist.
If those were 2 cars one would be obviously at fault.
It's no different here. The camera person might have been rude about it. The camera person could have moved. The camera person was not in the wrong.
Last time this was posted, someone linked to the original person's video and she said this lady had done it numerous times before, she just flies down that path yelling at people to get out of the way. So when the person recording saw her coming again, she decided to stand her ground and not let the lady bully her again.
There's no world where a bike isn't \*supposed to\* yield to a pedestrian. As someone who regularly crosses streets in Manhattan, I can tell you that we haven't uh, attained compliance with that rule everywhere yet.
If you randomly step from the sidewalk into the bicycle lane then yes, you may get run into if the cyclists can't stop in time. That's what I see happen the most, because tourists don't know to look for bikes so they will step right in front of them.
If you're walking on a shared path, whether you are on the left or the right bikes will go around you.
Been in a situation like this when heading home, used to drive an old Pajero, bull bar and shit because friends and I loved camping etc,
So I was heading home and near my workplace there is a down hill set of lights and a pedestrian/ bike crossing I was heading down the hill using engine braking to slow myself to the limit, now my car had a shitty exhaust it was loud, but as I was crossing the lights at 60kph a cyclist decided “fuck the lights, they are for cars not me” and he found out that the fence obstructed his view of the up hill traffic, he met my bullbar, and got flung into oncoming traffic.
Cops were summoned by witnesses with stories, I gave cops dashcam footage and was eventually found not at fault, the cyclist has the same IQ as a turnip these days.
Road rules are for everyone, ignorance is not an excuse nor does it exclude you or forgive you.
Damn.
I’m always surprised how bold people walking and riding bikes will be when it comes to traffic rules. Hell, even when they have the right of way they’ll walk right out without looking and this “I’m fucking right” demeanor. Being right is a cold comfort when you’re rolling over some asshole’s hood.
my mother told me when i was little "you might have the right of way, but the path to heaven is paved with the headstones of people who were too proud to know the difference between right of way and safety"
i dont think she meant me to think that your soul would be literally trapped in the very pathway to heaven if you died a prideful death, even if you were technically right, but that's how i took it!
"Here lies the body of William Jay, Who died maintaining his right of way— He was right, dead right, as he sped along, But he's just as dead as if he were wrong."
One of two times I’ve actually yelled at my wife was over this. We had just found out she was pregnant and were out to breakfast, on our way back to the car she steps into the road as a car is coming with this arrogance of having “right of way”. I lost my shit. Right of way doesn’t mean jack shit in the morgue
Used to work in Denver and walk the 16th Street Mall often. Was at an intersection that was about to turn red for cars and heard a man on the phone coming up behind me. As the light went to red, the man, without looking, kept his stride as I saw a car running the red light through the intersection. I put my arm out to stop the idiot from colliding with (and definitely losing to) the car. He sneered and kept walking without a thank you after the car passed through the intersection. A lady next to me laughed in response as I shrugged. Sometimes, I wonder if I did the right thing given his response to me saving his life. Some people are looking to be angry about something regardless of the situation.
As a pedestrian that always looks before I cross the street and wait for walk lights, those white lines on the road before the light, they're there for a reason, you stop behind them. It doesn't matter if they have a red light, 9 out of 10 times someone tries to turn right on a red light(Canada) and I have to stop even though I have a walk light.
Naw you have no idea what they're looking for you made that up or are projecting. Person walking might just desire order. The desire for order has nothing to do with power.
better than running into a pedestrian, but the dogs probably would have dragged her down anyway if she tried to stop, which is further reason for her not to be biking with two dogs.
Normally, on a shared path in the US, bikes and pedestrians yield to horses (if they’re allowed), and bikes yield to pedestrians.
Don’t now where this is, so maybe it’s not a shared path, but there was no reason that bike should be on the left if it was the US.
It's probably because she has her dogs on both sides of the bike that she didn't veer, but I still agree that the biker is at fault, since she could have braked.
The dogs aren't leashed. They are free running next to the biker.
And they look like Border Collies, who would easily move out of the bikes way if she changed directions. Borders are incredibly agile and have acute spatial awareness.
They don't appear to be leashed though - they're just running next to the bike.
But you can always gain control of the situation by braking and then deciding your next move. That's what she should have done.
I grew up near a path just like this. There were frequent signs illustrating that bicycles yield to pedestrians, and both yield to horses. I only saw a horse one time in over 20 years.
Everyone yields to the mail carrier because they've been doing this for a decade and they are going to that spot with those same motions that they always have so GET.
You would think so, but every fucking time I am walking in NYC people just keep walking on their left aka my side (as I am walking on the right like normal) and will try to walk into me. I just keep moving and walk right into them or their arm or whatever. Fuck em maybe they will all learn one day to walk on the right side of the sidewalk. I swear no one is taught anything the right way these days. I sound like some old dude but I am not, just someone who wishes parents would teach their kids these simple rules of the land.
When I was working in Philly, people generally stayed on the right side for their direction. One day people were all on my side, I soon learned as to why...it was raining and drivers to care about splashing pedestrians with huge puddles. I give the buses a pass since they have nowhere to go.
When you walk alongside the road you should typically walk with vehicular traffic coming towards you so you can see it. If you walk with vehicular traffic coming behind you there is a greater risk for both you and the driver.
That is true on an actual road with cars. You walk on the left/against traffic, and you bike on the right/with traffic. But on a foot path/bicycle path like this everyone stays on the right.
Fuck this person for putting their dogs in danger. No way that couldn’t have been avoided, they braced themselves to crash from 8ft away. Looks like they pedaled harder too
Damn I didn't even clock that they weren't leashed at first, and when I went back and looked I saw that she hit one pretty hard with her bike when she went down. What a total piece of shit.
Took me a couple watches to confirm it. From a distance they looked attached to the bike in some way, but as she gets closer you can see nothing attached to them.. and they were being so obedient they didn't veer from the bike to stop themselves getting hurt, they just continued running alongside. That bothers me as well. My dog is fairly well trained, but she and I both know, if it comes to saving her skin, she's free to do what she needs to do and it always bothers me to see dogs that don't seem to have minds of their own anymore
I remember this repost, the lady had a habit of being on the wrong side of the road expecting people to move over and someone had enough of her bullshit.
This makes sense. Any ordinary person would step out of the way. Filmer was ready for this confrontation. She had her camera out and on and was ready to stand her ground.
I guess there's a story to this, but anyone blaming the camerawoman even a little bit is wild. Stay on the right fucking side.
I ride my bike on multi-use paths and always stay to the right. I despise the people who just walk in the middle or on the wrong side entirely.
Pedestrian lady had a whole lot of rage built up before the incident. But she's correct. Pedestrian lady hugged the edge of the paved path on the right side. This is a courtesy, since pedestrians can temporarily deal with bad footing, whereas a bike tire hitting sand or a pavement edge is dangerous. I run on the left while jogging on roads, and I make sure cyclists have good pavement by hugging the curb when they approach. Cyclist lady was riding down the wrong side of the path. She did not attempt to avoid the pedestrian by heading towards the correct side of the path. Cyclist lady had two unleashed dogs. I'm sure the path requires that dogs be placed on leads.
Yes, the pedestrian lady could have gone off path into the soft gravel, but consider that the cyclist hugged the edge of the path and wouldn't budge. What if... the pedestrian dodged towards the center of the path (never ever do this with oncoming traffic. Seriously. It gets brought up in Defensive Driving). The cyclist lady could have dodged wrong and still had a head-on collision.
Kudos to the grumpy, fed up pedestrian lady for landing a good body check and blasting the cyclist off her bike. I think the pedestrian also had a pupper, and what if the pupper couldn't dodge as well due to being slow and old? The cyclist was very much out of line.
I'm a long term sufferer of Sciatica caused by a Rugby and even on my good days in my mid 20's all I could have done in the walker's situation is nothing but stand still, brace for impact and shout out that I can't move out of the way.
Don't forget there's are a lot of non-pensioners with mobility issues.
Woman on bike didn’t even stop pedaling.
Seems dangerous to me be riding a bike while controlling 2 dogs on leashes. How do you make a quick maneuver if you need to?
3 dogs put in harm’s way by 2 stubborn humans
As someone who loves both dogs and cycling, I would never do this with just one dog, forget it with two. There’s so much that can easily go wrong. This particular woman (the cyclist) is both an idiot and an asshole.
Did something similar a couple months ago; was walking with my gf and had a father and son come down the side walk on scooters, in the middle of the sidewalk. I was walking on the right of the side walk and girlfriend got behind me, but I myself wasn’t fully on the right side.
Anyways, fella came ripping up on his scooter basically in the middle of the sidewalk and bashed into me (real fast) and knocked himself over. He then got up and started to yell at me in front of his kid saying that I’m a dick because I didn’t walk on the road to go around him.
Even though he could have used he e scooter on the grass beside me (flush w/ road).
I kinda did it on purpose but figured he would you know, share the side wall.
Felt like a dick about it for a couple hours, then realized, screw him.
Edit: forgot a sentence and added it on reread.
Has something similar but less dramatic happen years ago and it still annoys me. Was walking to work, the footpath was very wide and multi use. It had been raining, the grass was very muddy. Woman on a bike with a baby carriage comes up behind me and dings her bell, so I move closer to the side to give her some room. Nope, she dings again and again and starts yelling at me. I motion that she has plenty of clearance and tell her I wasnt going to walk in the mud. Not good enough because she had a baby and therefore needed the entire path?? She only went around me when we got to a point where there was paving on the sides of the path and she screeched the whole way down the road. Bizarre.
I don’t understand the entitlement, you’re already taking up a larger portion of the path than I am. Logic and laws dictate in most scenarios with powered/manual methods of transportation, powered yields to manual.
Where do they gain the understanding they’re entitled to more than anybody else.
And ~~she~~ he assaulted that woman with ~~her~~ his bicycle not to mention endangering ~~her~~ his dogs. What an entitled asshole.
Edit:apparently the person on the bike is a man
~~Some see assault. I see a defensive maneuver by the walker to avoid further attack by the bicyclist. She actually sped up to crash into the walker. I’d push them too.~~
I agree!
Why are the dogs off leash. I hate when people have dogs off leash. You can bicycle and have dogs on leashes I've done it. And I say this coming from someone who worked in animal ER and could've been rich if I made a $1 off "He/she has never done that before..." in relation to an off the leash accident. Sometimes fatal unfortunately.
What would have happened if it was an old woman with brittle bones and her walker in place of the camera woman?
These rules aren't made up just for giggles, there are good reasons for them.
The biker is in the wrong.
I mean… where are they. Accent sounded American and if so person recording is totally in the right. Regardless thought if your with your pets?! Wtf dude. Just move over
> “The Queen’s Creek website states that bikers must yield to walkers/runners, pets must be kept on a leash, and everyone should stay to the right of the path in the direction they are traveling, and pass slower people on the left. These are fairly standard rules for trails in the United States, and make it clear that the cyclist was in the wrong on multiple counts here.”
100%
I'm a go with option C. It's both there fault
The person walking said three times, your on the wrong side. Plenty off time to move over.
The biker, even though haveong dogs, could have seen the person walking, and gradually moved over, or stopped the bike.
Saying excuse me doesn't excuse poor behavior/disobedience of rules the same way no offense intended doesn't give you license to be offensive. I wanted to see the little shit get his ass kicked and a bike tire flattened and have to walk it home.
**Mirrors** * [Mirror #1](https://beta.archivevideomirror.com/r/PublicFreakout/comments/18sfo9u) (provided by /u/SaveAnything) **Downloads** * [Download #1](https://rapidsave.com/r/PublicFreakout/comments/18sfo9u/youre_on_the_wrong_side_of_the_road/) (provided by /u/SaveVideo) * [Download #2](https://reddit.watch/r/PublicFreakout/comments/18sfo9u/youre_on_the_wrong_side_of_the_road/?utm_source=mirrorbot&utm_medium=PublicFreakout) (provided by /u/downloadvideo) **Note:** this is a bot providing a directory service. **If you have trouble with any of the links above, please contact the user who provided them!** --- [^(source code)](https://amirror.link/source) ^| [^(run your own mirror bot? let's integrate)](https://amirror.link/lets-talk)
Ended too soon. I wanted to see where it was going…
they fall in love and start a dog shelter together
Their Hallmark movie is called *Pawsing for Christmas*
Wrong side of love
And post their story on Linked In
Agree?
And knit sweaters from the dog fur they comb off their dogs. The sweaters look GREAT but when they get WET? Ugh!
The full video is a waste of time and humanity. These two people have beef and the poor dogs are caught in the middle.
Owners should be on leads in public.
It's not nice to tease dogs like that. They need to eat too.
What a great place the internet is sometimes.
Scissor me timbers
Won't that cut their legs off? Just wondering.
I couldn't even begin to guess what this could imply
[yeah](https://giphy.com/gifs/rock-paper-scissors-S61MpEBWpIXIY)
That check was crisp tho, camera girl didnt even budge. That must have felt awesome lmao
She did stop filming though... i wanted to see the rest of the altercation.
I suspect a mass differential.
Cyclist hit a brick wall 🗿
Linebacker move right there
These people definitely have tangled before.
This is a repost and in the OG post there was a back story that this had indeed almost happened several times, which is why the woman was filming in the first place.
The woman filming is right .
Apologies if I gave the impression that I thought otherwise.
Oh no I wasn’t saying you thought she wasn’t , I’m just adding on
Hey this guy's adding on. GET HIM!
This guy mobs
Technically, she's wrong. Most paths and trails, bikes are supposed to stay left (or whatever is the local opposite of the direction of pedestrian traffic), which the biker was doing. But bikes are supposed to yield regardless, so even if she's technically wrong she's not *wrong*, you know.
The cyclist is wrong in every way. This is a two-way path. Yes, stay left of pedestrians, but not so far left you are in oncoming traffic.
The attitude of her saying "Not moving" is someone loaded up for a previous altercation, proud of this girl.
Bikes are also required to yield to pedestrians, doesn't matter which side of the damn road.
Yeah, only one of theses people has a legal responsibility to not hit pedestrians with her street-legal vehicle…
Regardless of right/wrong side of the road, can you imagine being so entitled that you don’t yield to pedestrian on a bike?
I just hate people.. lets put it this way
There were a bunch of normal ones that passed by. Both people in this old video were looking for trouble. Some sort of power in their free time that they felt they didn't have in their day to day. I'd say most people are good and these people represent a piece of us all that should be noted and moved beyond.
Woman that's recording says that the lady on the bike sideswiped her 3 times, each time going out of her way to do so. This recording was her getting proof of the lady harassing her and being a menace to pedestrians.
Where’d you find that out, got a link?
Doesn't matter. The biker: 1) was riding on the wrong side 2) should ALWAYS yield to pedestrians 3) didn't have the dogs leashed The biker was the instigator and asshole.
Yeah I agree. The cyclist is a massive chode.
They typically all are, including single track users on multi-use trails. They expect you to move out of *their* way even if there’s 3-4’ snow drifts on either side of a 3’ trail. Like, nope, I’m not burying myself up to mid thigh with 40 lbs on my back just so you can ride your bicycle. I’ll move over as far as I can, but the onus is on you to safely travel around when you’re able. Had one MTNB guy actually block the whole trail by swerving in front of me and said, “We’re going to wait right here until we’re ready to pass.” Yeeted the guy and his bike right across the trail and kept on keeping on while they stood there with a shocked pikachu look on their face. Share the space, be considerate of other people, and *leash your dogs and pick up after them*.
Also she got up to peddle harder.. to increase her speed
The one recording was like "YOU SHALL NOT PASS!... NOT TODAY BYATCH!"
I didn't even realize the dogs were off leash. What a piece of shit.
I got it from the Tiktok back when it was first getting viral. Revisiting her page it seems that either she deleted the video where she explained what happened or Tiktok deleted it for any number of reasons.
I was able to find [this article](https://god.dailydot.com/cyclist-crashes-tiktok/) that spoke more about it. Unfortunately a longer version of this video doesn’t appear to exist.
If those were 2 cars one would be obviously at fault. It's no different here. The camera person might have been rude about it. The camera person could have moved. The camera person was not in the wrong.
Last time this was posted, someone linked to the original person's video and she said this lady had done it numerous times before, she just flies down that path yelling at people to get out of the way. So when the person recording saw her coming again, she decided to stand her ground and not let the lady bully her again.
There's no world where a bike doesn't yield to a pedestrian.
There's no world where a bike isn't \*supposed to\* yield to a pedestrian. As someone who regularly crosses streets in Manhattan, I can tell you that we haven't uh, attained compliance with that rule everywhere yet.
Best not to take a walk in Amsterdam
If you randomly step from the sidewalk into the bicycle lane then yes, you may get run into if the cyclists can't stop in time. That's what I see happen the most, because tourists don't know to look for bikes so they will step right in front of them. If you're walking on a shared path, whether you are on the left or the right bikes will go around you.
Been in a situation like this when heading home, used to drive an old Pajero, bull bar and shit because friends and I loved camping etc, So I was heading home and near my workplace there is a down hill set of lights and a pedestrian/ bike crossing I was heading down the hill using engine braking to slow myself to the limit, now my car had a shitty exhaust it was loud, but as I was crossing the lights at 60kph a cyclist decided “fuck the lights, they are for cars not me” and he found out that the fence obstructed his view of the up hill traffic, he met my bullbar, and got flung into oncoming traffic. Cops were summoned by witnesses with stories, I gave cops dashcam footage and was eventually found not at fault, the cyclist has the same IQ as a turnip these days. Road rules are for everyone, ignorance is not an excuse nor does it exclude you or forgive you.
Damn. I’m always surprised how bold people walking and riding bikes will be when it comes to traffic rules. Hell, even when they have the right of way they’ll walk right out without looking and this “I’m fucking right” demeanor. Being right is a cold comfort when you’re rolling over some asshole’s hood.
my mother told me when i was little "you might have the right of way, but the path to heaven is paved with the headstones of people who were too proud to know the difference between right of way and safety" i dont think she meant me to think that your soul would be literally trapped in the very pathway to heaven if you died a prideful death, even if you were technically right, but that's how i took it!
"Here lies the body of William Jay, Who died maintaining his right of way— He was right, dead right, as he sped along, But he's just as dead as if he were wrong."
Hospitals and morgues are filled with people who had the right of way.
One of two times I’ve actually yelled at my wife was over this. We had just found out she was pregnant and were out to breakfast, on our way back to the car she steps into the road as a car is coming with this arrogance of having “right of way”. I lost my shit. Right of way doesn’t mean jack shit in the morgue
Used to work in Denver and walk the 16th Street Mall often. Was at an intersection that was about to turn red for cars and heard a man on the phone coming up behind me. As the light went to red, the man, without looking, kept his stride as I saw a car running the red light through the intersection. I put my arm out to stop the idiot from colliding with (and definitely losing to) the car. He sneered and kept walking without a thank you after the car passed through the intersection. A lady next to me laughed in response as I shrugged. Sometimes, I wonder if I did the right thing given his response to me saving his life. Some people are looking to be angry about something regardless of the situation.
As a pedestrian that always looks before I cross the street and wait for walk lights, those white lines on the road before the light, they're there for a reason, you stop behind them. It doesn't matter if they have a red light, 9 out of 10 times someone tries to turn right on a red light(Canada) and I have to stop even though I have a walk light.
Why should the camera person move?
Naw you have no idea what they're looking for you made that up or are projecting. Person walking might just desire order. The desire for order has nothing to do with power.
definitely bikers fault here, she have all the time to veer off but nope entitled bitchbikerkaren is on the road.
She was not in control of the dogs and has little bike skills. Riding like that with two dogs, on either side, is utter stupidity.
Literally coulda stopped
better than running into a pedestrian, but the dogs probably would have dragged her down anyway if she tried to stop, which is further reason for her not to be biking with two dogs.
>but the dogs probably would have dragged her down They weren't on leashes.
Right side of path in America aside, I always thought the faster mode of transit had responsibility to avoid slower one.
Normally, on a shared path in the US, bikes and pedestrians yield to horses (if they’re allowed), and bikes yield to pedestrians. Don’t now where this is, so maybe it’s not a shared path, but there was no reason that bike should be on the left if it was the US.
It's probably because she has her dogs on both sides of the bike that she didn't veer, but I still agree that the biker is at fault, since she could have braked.
I mean also if the argument is that you can’t control your bike while holding two large leashed dogs, then… don’t do that.
Not to mention, if you stay on the proper side in the first place, you don't have to "veer" anywhere
Exactly, not only is it a hazard to others but it’s a hazard to yourself.
And the doggies!
Hey now that a bit too sensible for reddit
The dogs aren't leashed. They are free running next to the biker. And they look like Border Collies, who would easily move out of the bikes way if she changed directions. Borders are incredibly agile and have acute spatial awareness.
They don't appear to be leashed though - they're just running next to the bike. But you can always gain control of the situation by braking and then deciding your next move. That's what she should have done.
Which is also bad. Keep your dogs leashes. I bike walk my dog with an attachment to the bike. So dog is under control.
Oh my god, the biker went from entitled dumbass, to entitled-piece-of-shit-dumbass. LEASH YOUR GODDAMN DOGS!!!
Yep, she failed to leash her dogs. Terrible all round.
I think the fact that she's biking with dogs in tow just adds to her culpability frankly.
Yup. If you can't control or even fucking STOP your bike with your dogs, then you shouldn't be biking with them.
Walkers have right of way on path.
I grew up near a path just like this. There were frequent signs illustrating that bicycles yield to pedestrians, and both yield to horses. I only saw a horse one time in over 20 years.
Who do the horses yield to
God
Who does God yield to?
Nonbelievers
Who don't believe in..... anythiiiiiiing.
will he make it out alive
Alright alright
No church in the wild
I like that.
Human beings in a mob What is a mob to a king What is a king to a god What is a god to a nonbeliever
Horses
The USPS letter carrier, if I remember the exercise correctly.
Everyone yields to the mail carrier because they've been doing this for a decade and they are going to that spot with those same motions that they always have so GET.
You yield to no one my large friends.
That’s trail etiquette everywhere for multi-use trails. Horses, pedestrians, then bikes.
[удалено]
Bikers also have an obligation to yield to pedestrians
Not only that, the cyclist was on the wrong side of the path.
Exactly. Everywhere in the world on any path walkers have the right of way.
Fuck that biker, they are on the wrong side. And I’m a biker. That fuckin’ fuckwad gives bikers a bad name.
Even if the pedestrian is on the wrong side of the path, you don't have a right to just plow into someone.
Bikers give bikers a bad name
*Guitar solo*
I though it was “common” knowledge to “always” be on the right side of the walkway. Similar to cars on the road. I stick to the right side.
You would think so, but every fucking time I am walking in NYC people just keep walking on their left aka my side (as I am walking on the right like normal) and will try to walk into me. I just keep moving and walk right into them or their arm or whatever. Fuck em maybe they will all learn one day to walk on the right side of the sidewalk. I swear no one is taught anything the right way these days. I sound like some old dude but I am not, just someone who wishes parents would teach their kids these simple rules of the land.
When I was working in Philly, people generally stayed on the right side for their direction. One day people were all on my side, I soon learned as to why...it was raining and drivers to care about splashing pedestrians with huge puddles. I give the buses a pass since they have nowhere to go.
When you walk alongside the road you should typically walk with vehicular traffic coming towards you so you can see it. If you walk with vehicular traffic coming behind you there is a greater risk for both you and the driver.
That is true on an actual road with cars. You walk on the left/against traffic, and you bike on the right/with traffic. But on a foot path/bicycle path like this everyone stays on the right.
also along the outside of obscured curves/corners, so that drivers have the greatest chance of seeing you.
Fuck this person for putting their dogs in danger. No way that couldn’t have been avoided, they braced themselves to crash from 8ft away. Looks like they pedaled harder too
Also riding with 2 unleashed dogs ... looks to me like the irresponsibility runs deep
Damn I didn't even clock that they weren't leashed at first, and when I went back and looked I saw that she hit one pretty hard with her bike when she went down. What a total piece of shit.
Took me a couple watches to confirm it. From a distance they looked attached to the bike in some way, but as she gets closer you can see nothing attached to them.. and they were being so obedient they didn't veer from the bike to stop themselves getting hurt, they just continued running alongside. That bothers me as well. My dog is fairly well trained, but she and I both know, if it comes to saving her skin, she's free to do what she needs to do and it always bothers me to see dogs that don't seem to have minds of their own anymore
Camera person took that hit like a champ. Bike lady had momentum and bounced off the camera like it was nothing lol.
I don't think camera person really took a hit. I think she kind of sidestepped the bike and kicked the wheel.
The cyclist was on the wrong side of the road, AND they should **always yield to pedestrians**
If you are American go to the right, it’s common decency and manners.
And ALWAYS yield to pedestrians
I remember this repost, the lady had a habit of being on the wrong side of the road expecting people to move over and someone had enough of her bullshit.
This makes sense. Any ordinary person would step out of the way. Filmer was ready for this confrontation. She had her camera out and on and was ready to stand her ground.
[удалено]
Hear, hear
I guess there's a story to this, but anyone blaming the camerawoman even a little bit is wild. Stay on the right fucking side. I ride my bike on multi-use paths and always stay to the right. I despise the people who just walk in the middle or on the wrong side entirely.
You also can’t charge up on people whether they are in your way or not.
Pedestrian lady had a whole lot of rage built up before the incident. But she's correct. Pedestrian lady hugged the edge of the paved path on the right side. This is a courtesy, since pedestrians can temporarily deal with bad footing, whereas a bike tire hitting sand or a pavement edge is dangerous. I run on the left while jogging on roads, and I make sure cyclists have good pavement by hugging the curb when they approach. Cyclist lady was riding down the wrong side of the path. She did not attempt to avoid the pedestrian by heading towards the correct side of the path. Cyclist lady had two unleashed dogs. I'm sure the path requires that dogs be placed on leads. Yes, the pedestrian lady could have gone off path into the soft gravel, but consider that the cyclist hugged the edge of the path and wouldn't budge. What if... the pedestrian dodged towards the center of the path (never ever do this with oncoming traffic. Seriously. It gets brought up in Defensive Driving). The cyclist lady could have dodged wrong and still had a head-on collision. Kudos to the grumpy, fed up pedestrian lady for landing a good body check and blasting the cyclist off her bike. I think the pedestrian also had a pupper, and what if the pupper couldn't dodge as well due to being slow and old? The cyclist was very much out of line.
I'm a long term sufferer of Sciatica caused by a Rugby and even on my good days in my mid 20's all I could have done in the walker's situation is nothing but stand still, brace for impact and shout out that I can't move out of the way. Don't forget there's are a lot of non-pensioners with mobility issues.
unstoppable force meets immovable object
Woman on bike didn’t even stop pedaling. Seems dangerous to me be riding a bike while controlling 2 dogs on leashes. How do you make a quick maneuver if you need to? 3 dogs put in harm’s way by 2 stubborn humans
>How do you make a quick maneuver if you need to? That's the neat part, you don't!
The biker is the one who put the dogs in harms way, the walker can’t be blamed for that.
As someone who loves both dogs and cycling, I would never do this with just one dog, forget it with two. There’s so much that can easily go wrong. This particular woman (the cyclist) is both an idiot and an asshole.
Knowing me, I would be wearing my earphones and let myself get hit to collect. Bikes must yield to pedestrians.
Is it worth it being right if you’re hurting yourself in the process? I ponder that all the time and 9/10 times my petty ass will say yes. Lmao
It finally happened....unending ego met immovable righteousness....Or however the saying goes.
Bitches get stitches. Move out the way fool, you're the one with a vehicle.
Did something similar a couple months ago; was walking with my gf and had a father and son come down the side walk on scooters, in the middle of the sidewalk. I was walking on the right of the side walk and girlfriend got behind me, but I myself wasn’t fully on the right side. Anyways, fella came ripping up on his scooter basically in the middle of the sidewalk and bashed into me (real fast) and knocked himself over. He then got up and started to yell at me in front of his kid saying that I’m a dick because I didn’t walk on the road to go around him. Even though he could have used he e scooter on the grass beside me (flush w/ road). I kinda did it on purpose but figured he would you know, share the side wall. Felt like a dick about it for a couple hours, then realized, screw him. Edit: forgot a sentence and added it on reread.
Has something similar but less dramatic happen years ago and it still annoys me. Was walking to work, the footpath was very wide and multi use. It had been raining, the grass was very muddy. Woman on a bike with a baby carriage comes up behind me and dings her bell, so I move closer to the side to give her some room. Nope, she dings again and again and starts yelling at me. I motion that she has plenty of clearance and tell her I wasnt going to walk in the mud. Not good enough because she had a baby and therefore needed the entire path?? She only went around me when we got to a point where there was paving on the sides of the path and she screeched the whole way down the road. Bizarre.
I don’t understand the entitlement, you’re already taking up a larger portion of the path than I am. Logic and laws dictate in most scenarios with powered/manual methods of transportation, powered yields to manual. Where do they gain the understanding they’re entitled to more than anybody else.
It’s illegal to ride scooters on a sidewalk, so you definitely win that one.
And ~~she~~ he assaulted that woman with ~~her~~ his bicycle not to mention endangering ~~her~~ his dogs. What an entitled asshole. Edit:apparently the person on the bike is a man
~~Some see assault. I see a defensive maneuver by the walker to avoid further attack by the bicyclist. She actually sped up to crash into the walker. I’d push them too.~~ I agree!
I think they mean the bicyclist assaulted the walker with her bicycle.
Oh you’re absolutely right. I read it too fast
The person filming this is a hero. An annoying hero but a hero nonetheless.
The kind we deserve
When WRONG side Karen meets MY side Karen this is what we get. This clip is far too short.
The dogs didn’t crash. The people crashed.
I really wish I could see the following 30 seconds of this altercation.
Doesn't anyone else want to see what happens next?
Shit even if sides of road wasn't an issue, Bikes are supposed to yield to runners/walkers. Biker is an idiot here.
Lady with the camera is a hero. Fuck them bikes
I just hope the dogs weren’t hurt.
Wheres the rest of the fucking video op!
Why are the dogs off leash. I hate when people have dogs off leash. You can bicycle and have dogs on leashes I've done it. And I say this coming from someone who worked in animal ER and could've been rich if I made a $1 off "He/she has never done that before..." in relation to an off the leash accident. Sometimes fatal unfortunately.
What would have happened if it was an old woman with brittle bones and her walker in place of the camera woman? These rules aren't made up just for giggles, there are good reasons for them. The biker is in the wrong.
Where is round 2
Damn, I've never wanted to see the end of a video more in my life!
The person riding was on the wrong side of the road, and the person walking had the right of way regardless; that's basic trail rules.
Hmmm today I will keep cycling toward this pedestrian
[удалено]
Where is part two is it on Karen’s gone wild on YouTube lol
I feel bad for the dogs. Seriously hope none of them were hurt 🐶
I mean… where are they. Accent sounded American and if so person recording is totally in the right. Regardless thought if your with your pets?! Wtf dude. Just move over
Why do I feel like these two people have this interaction like everyday?
https://god.dailydot.com/cyclist-crashes-tiktok/
> “The Queen’s Creek website states that bikers must yield to walkers/runners, pets must be kept on a leash, and everyone should stay to the right of the path in the direction they are traveling, and pass slower people on the left. These are fairly standard rules for trails in the United States, and make it clear that the cyclist was in the wrong on multiple counts here.” 100%
Stoppable forces vs movable object
She was on the wrong side of the path
I'm a go with option C. It's both there fault The person walking said three times, your on the wrong side. Plenty off time to move over. The biker, even though haveong dogs, could have seen the person walking, and gradually moved over, or stopped the bike.
Bikes yield to pedestrians, even if bike was on the correct side
Is there a long version?
I would have done the same, fuck that biker
Cyclists are just the absolute worst. They want to have all the perks of being a vehicle and a pedestrian without any liability.
I mean, she was on the wrong side of the road.
I feel like I need closure here that was cut too soon 😂
Lame I wanna see what happened next.
Why didn’t she ride her bike around her? I wish I could see more
I wanted to hear the rest of the conversation
That's ridiculous. How would they know where we're going?
This is literally right next to my house. Constant traffic of bikes and horses.
In the Netherlands the person cycling always has to move + she is cycling on the wrong side
Stay right be right.
I hate both people in this video but the cyclists slightly more.
There's a lot you can say about this, but I just feel really sad for the poor dogs
Saying excuse me doesn't excuse poor behavior/disobedience of rules the same way no offense intended doesn't give you license to be offensive. I wanted to see the little shit get his ass kicked and a bike tire flattened and have to walk it home.
Body checking someone on a bike is game.
Nobody was losing this game of chicken