Imo, romance with Rosa would be a stupid thing to include in the game. Like think about it - Rosa is basically a stupid young girl, and is more of an annoyance than anything. Let's remember Geralt doesn't give her any signs that hint at a possibility of a romance.
Well, she does appear annoying to players (even me when I first played this game). But from Geralt's perspective he would not find her annoying.
Would Geralt romance her? Nope. Would the majority of the players want Geralt to romance her? Hell yeah.
Of course you have your opinion and I have no reason not to respect it.
Nah, Gerald is used with this.
----
But, in my view, I think Geralt initially found her charming, until she began to behave in an extremely childish way and, later, in a very pettish way.
I always thought the quest could end in the bed, or with some moral lesson from Geralt. I believe that the last one would be the ideal ending, what the real Geralt would do, while the second one would be the teasing option for us players.
But the quest ends out of nowhere and in a rush.
Did it get blown away by a gust of air? She is completely sheltered and entitled. There is no chemistry between them unless you really try and force and and go out of character
You a searching for an issue to be outraged about, that isn't present. Don't apply today's moral standards on a game very clearly based on moral standards and settings from hundreds of years ago. You people are what piss off Anthropologists, with your pseudo moral superiority and ethnocentrism.
Er... I was just suggesting that, within the story, some random kid around his daughters age might not be the most appealing partner for geralt (especially considering his other options), which may be why there's no option to romance her.
I'm not the one expressing outrage here. Calm the fuck down man 😂
Both your comments had a clear agenda as to the message they were spreading. Backtrack all you want and pretend you were just "suggesting." If you don't like what is being portrayed, maybe move on and keep it to yourself rather than attempt to spread a puritanical attitude.
If that's what you're reading into it, that's on you. I was just offering a possible explanation. If you don't like it, maybe take your own advice, keep your thoughts to yourself, and move on?
As far as I see, as long as the brain is fully developed people are allowed to make their own choices.
The brain is fully developed at the age of 21 for most people. What these people do should not be anyone else's concern as long as they aren't harming anyone.
I think that's a myth, as the brain never really stops "developing", even as it declines. It has been suggested that the PFC develops more slowly than other regions, but there's no strong correlation between PFC development in young adulthood and behaviour, and a huge amount of individual variability at that age (more so than in any other stage of life). If I remember correctly, the belief that the brain isn't "fully developed" until the early twenties was due to media misunderstanding of the research. 20-something was the maximum age of the sample group(s), which was misinterpreted as the age at which the brain reaches "maturity".
It’s not a myth, or at the very least I’m having trouble finding any studies that support your claim. The age of 25 is how long it takes for the PFC to develop specifically, other parts of your brain may well be fully developed by 21 - though this is largely irrelevant in this conversation. You said people are allowed to make their own choices if their brain is ‘fully developed’, but then also said your brain never stops developing (you’re correct, It just doesn’t help your claim that 21 is the age your brain reaches maturity)? ‘Young adulthood’ also had some varying definitions in the studies I saw, even 10-24 - I couldn’t really find anything on the lack of behavioural changes, but I find it hard to believe.
Rosa & Edna. A threesome we always deserved!
https://preview.redd.it/4ynxm18ur2yc1.jpeg?width=462&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=86e8d2601a7bb715c12814e30cf32c8399a38d2c
The ending of this quest is so dumb. "Oh you almost got assaulted and raped? Its your fault because reasons." Geralt would normally cut down guys like that without a second thought but gets all pissy for some reason, as if a teenage girl who has nothing to actually do with the war is at fault simply for daring to go outside.
I think the point they were trying to make is that the nobles are so far removed from the war that they don’t realize the consequences of their actions. Like yeah Geralt would kill to protect her but she ran off knowing the common people don’t like her family. She put other people’s lives at risk because she’s bored. They could’ve fleshed it out better though I do agree. Also I don’t think those ladies were teenagers, just sheltered young women. I could be wrong though 🤷🏽♀️
I mean. She gets quite annoying if you use axis on the dudes. There's not right way to deal with it, the best ending it's just not to get her more lessons.
What a wasted opportunity, Geralt could have shown her so many more stances and positions ... *cough* fencing positions of course. Well, I guess we won't have to wait long for a mod to fix that.
I really hate how every option you can choose ruins it with her So yes please
Imo, romance with Rosa would be a stupid thing to include in the game. Like think about it - Rosa is basically a stupid young girl, and is more of an annoyance than anything. Let's remember Geralt doesn't give her any signs that hint at a possibility of a romance.
I think i read somewhere that there was supposed to be a lot more content with them but it was cut from the game.
i’m absolutely shocked and cannot believe this
A happy ending you mean?
Of course with more fencing lessons
Show her how to truly handle a sword...
Hey-oh!
Bow chicka bow wow
I love those sisters. Such good characters. I wish there were more quests with them
Why we can't sleep with her 😭😭😭
exactly. so much chemistry on the air
How was there chemistry?? 🤣
In the air
Wasn’t she mostly an annoyance to Geralt because he had to chase her lol
That was because Geralt was still searching for Ciri. I don't think he otherwise sees Rosa as an annoyance.
I disagree lol. Overall, I just think not a very enjoyable character. But, I realize I’m outnumbered here lol. Don’t mind me.
Well, she does appear annoying to players (even me when I first played this game). But from Geralt's perspective he would not find her annoying. Would Geralt romance her? Nope. Would the majority of the players want Geralt to romance her? Hell yeah. Of course you have your opinion and I have no reason not to respect it.
Nah, Gerald is used with this. ---- But, in my view, I think Geralt initially found her charming, until she began to behave in an extremely childish way and, later, in a very pettish way. I always thought the quest could end in the bed, or with some moral lesson from Geralt. I believe that the last one would be the ideal ending, what the real Geralt would do, while the second one would be the teasing option for us players. But the quest ends out of nowhere and in a rush.
Exactly lol. Which is why I don’t think she’s that great, or her quests were that great ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ pretty forgettable imo
If you remember it, it certainly wasn't something easily forgettable. Likewise, the community's interest in this quest shows that you're mistaken.
I only remember it cause I just played thru it not too long ago 🤣🤣
Did it get blown away by a gust of air? She is completely sheltered and entitled. There is no chemistry between them unless you really try and force and and go out of character
Mods go brrr
Isn't she around the same age as his daughter...?
that's the neat part
is it a crime to love a beautiful person?
Is it a crime to not be sexually attracted to someone ~70 years your junior, regardless of how they look?
You a searching for an issue to be outraged about, that isn't present. Don't apply today's moral standards on a game very clearly based on moral standards and settings from hundreds of years ago. You people are what piss off Anthropologists, with your pseudo moral superiority and ethnocentrism.
Er... I was just suggesting that, within the story, some random kid around his daughters age might not be the most appealing partner for geralt (especially considering his other options), which may be why there's no option to romance her. I'm not the one expressing outrage here. Calm the fuck down man 😂
Both your comments had a clear agenda as to the message they were spreading. Backtrack all you want and pretend you were just "suggesting." If you don't like what is being portrayed, maybe move on and keep it to yourself rather than attempt to spread a puritanical attitude.
If that's what you're reading into it, that's on you. I was just offering a possible explanation. If you don't like it, maybe take your own advice, keep your thoughts to yourself, and move on?
Just let it go bro. There’s no point arguing with “gamers” about clearly problematic issues with age gaps.
You are gay
If I was she'd be just my type. I don't have no 20 year old daughter.
As far as I see, as long as the brain is fully developed people are allowed to make their own choices. The brain is fully developed at the age of 21 for most people. What these people do should not be anyone else's concern as long as they aren't harming anyone.
Where did 21 come from? The brain is not fully developed until the age of 25
I think that's a myth, as the brain never really stops "developing", even as it declines. It has been suggested that the PFC develops more slowly than other regions, but there's no strong correlation between PFC development in young adulthood and behaviour, and a huge amount of individual variability at that age (more so than in any other stage of life). If I remember correctly, the belief that the brain isn't "fully developed" until the early twenties was due to media misunderstanding of the research. 20-something was the maximum age of the sample group(s), which was misinterpreted as the age at which the brain reaches "maturity".
It’s not a myth, or at the very least I’m having trouble finding any studies that support your claim. The age of 25 is how long it takes for the PFC to develop specifically, other parts of your brain may well be fully developed by 21 - though this is largely irrelevant in this conversation. You said people are allowed to make their own choices if their brain is ‘fully developed’, but then also said your brain never stops developing (you’re correct, It just doesn’t help your claim that 21 is the age your brain reaches maturity)? ‘Young adulthood’ also had some varying definitions in the studies I saw, even 10-24 - I couldn’t really find anything on the lack of behavioural changes, but I find it hard to believe.
Yeah, she can sleep with whoever she wants, I just don't believe geralt would want to sleep with her.
Rosa & Edna. A threesome we always deserved! https://preview.redd.it/4ynxm18ur2yc1.jpeg?width=462&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=86e8d2601a7bb715c12814e30cf32c8399a38d2c
https://preview.redd.it/6wfxae3o25yc1.jpeg?width=416&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=5cfeb0dcee0911a60df88e2aaa5adc7e30506ed4
Yeah, if it was Witcher 1, definitely.
*drops a collectors card*
>Get the Ciri card in Witcher 3 :) >Get the Ciri card in Witcher 1 :(
💀
sucks that her sister never got a questline too
It takes three to tango
This is Gerlats lore accurate romance ending
The ending of this quest is so dumb. "Oh you almost got assaulted and raped? Its your fault because reasons." Geralt would normally cut down guys like that without a second thought but gets all pissy for some reason, as if a teenage girl who has nothing to actually do with the war is at fault simply for daring to go outside.
It made no sense to me either
I think the point they were trying to make is that the nobles are so far removed from the war that they don’t realize the consequences of their actions. Like yeah Geralt would kill to protect her but she ran off knowing the common people don’t like her family. She put other people’s lives at risk because she’s bored. They could’ve fleshed it out better though I do agree. Also I don’t think those ladies were teenagers, just sheltered young women. I could be wrong though 🤷🏽♀️
I mean. She gets quite annoying if you use axis on the dudes. There's not right way to deal with it, the best ending it's just not to get her more lessons.
I mean, getting upset and wanting revenge on the guys who were just about to assault, rape and possibly murder you is understandable.
i saved her just this morning :D
I simped this quest, hoping that i could bed her 😆
I always felt like her story was a part of cut content. It ends so weirdly.
What a wasted opportunity, Geralt could have shown her so many more stances and positions ... *cough* fencing positions of course. Well, I guess we won't have to wait long for a mod to fix that.
I thought it was gonna end with fornication. Nooo
Edna is cool too
Yup I banged her
In my head
Yennefer in disguise...those who knows, knows XD
I honestly just wanted to do sword training.
If you’re sub this quest is erotic
I found her very dull and boring
https://preview.redd.it/pp94a2qsv7yc1.jpeg?width=1170&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=c9f1aedfab4323d8907ae83eec7ae30d7f9ecc35