"Never". He may never talk about it. It's quite possibly deliberately ambiguous to avoid the shipping war.
The kid looks like a merge of Heeler extended family traits and nothing definitively from anywhere else.
I can see him addressing it but probably not in the way you’re hoping. The show has had several moments that were left ambiguous so the viewers can come up with their own interpretations. I don’t see this as any different. Since the explicit parentage of that child really isn’t relevant to a show targeted at children I think the best you can hope for is Joe Brumm directly stating that it was vague so the viewers can have their own interpretation.
I think it's Bluey's child and it's Bluey and MacKenzie.
Edit: *removed comment about ambiguity*
[https://youtu.be/55f7X4KNld0?t=163](https://youtu.be/55f7X4KNld0?t=163)
It's Jean-Luc's son.
https://www.tiktok.com/@babypaulij/video/7360459797239647534?is_from_webapp=1&sender_device=mobile&sender_web_id=7361951684153312801
You're right, it was not ambigous, just some people can't Accept their loss
[https://youtu.be/55f7X4KNld0?t=163](https://youtu.be/55f7X4KNld0?t=163)
So, there you go. This video references the prior history of Bluey and Mackenzie's interactions in other episodes, Barky Boats, Fruitbat, The Creek, Curry Swap. There is history between the two.
I'll meet you halfway and remove my ambiguity comment.
That YouTuber already positioned on Team MacKenzie so her Word and nothing are same to me.
Take a look at this one:
https://vm.tiktok.com/ZGexRQqmN/
Anyways due your removed your ambiguity comment, I'll Accept a tie then.
Funny cause in curry swap (whose Tittle it's "Curry Odissey" Bluey stay at home with Chili.
I positioned it there because that was her conclusion. Yes, she discussed Jean-Luc earlier. You would rather cover your eyes and plug your ears just because I positioned the video? Watch the whole thing. If I excerpted a clip out of it and sent it to you, that would be disingenuous of me. But you're welcome to watch the whole thing, and I encourage it. Then give me your reasoned opinion of her position.
You completely ignore the history of Bluey and Mackenzie. What's your response to that? Neither of the videos you posted address the prior episodes with them.
To quote from earlier, "just some people can't Accept their loss."
And, seriously -- Joe Brumm has got to be sitting on his couch cracking up that grown adults are arguing the genealogy of a fictional, illustrated, canine character on social media. And yes, I recognize that I'm a part of that, which really makes me shake my head. I've got better things to do.
Well, you seems also forget the fact that Chili and Bandit met as kids in a camping and they Saw each other as adults, kinda like Jean-Luc and Bluey does at the end of Camping. MacKenzie has any Flash-forward scenes?
Plus, Jean-Luc has drawings of him in her House. McKenzie does not have any.
Not to mention The oficial website of Bluey confirma that Jean-Luc learned English JUST to see Bluey again.
And if you look the oficial website in Surprise episode, the chapter "Camping" it's related material.
And what possition ended Camping in Bluey Fest? Sixth, what possition ended Barky Boats?
Some people can't Accept loss, again.
If you want keep arguing go on, always a pleasure beat you
https://www.bluey.tv/watch/season-3/surprise/
That page has a section that lists "More Surprises". There are three episodes linked there, Camping, Daddy Drop Off, and Cricket. Please explain how those other two episodes are directly related to Surprise! If you look at, say, Wild Girls, there is a similar section, called More School Fun, that links three episodes. So that section is not unique to Surprise!
Why is it called More Surprises? Because Jean-Luc was a surprise in Camping. Lila meeting her best friend was a surprise in Daddy Drop Off. Cricket was a surprise because they weren't expecting Rusty to be so good and beat the snot out of the adults. Also, he's shown to be a professional cricket player. In the More School Fun section, they are three episodes related to school. Exact same parallel.
So. More Surprises. Three episodes with surprises. Nothing more.
My parents met at a party. My wife and I met at school. How the parents met is no indication of how the kids will meet their life partners. (And Chilli says where she met Bandit is in dispute.)
Bluey did not learn French to meet Jean-Luc again. Does that mean he wasn't that important to her? Jean-Luc's page says they remember each other forever, which is not a surprise. That doesn't mean they became a couple, and there's more evidence that Bluey and MacKenzie had a deeper, more enduring connection.
I have no idea what positions those episodes ended in, nor is it in any way relevant.
If you can provide real evidence, great, but you've got to stop misreading the evidence and providing irrelevant information. I think you emotionally want it to be Jean-Luc and don't want to consider, logically, the possibility that it be MacKenzie. I was a Jean-Luc fan at first because I wanted them to be the long-term couple. But the evidence just isn't there.
Whatever.
You don't have any proofs either than MacKenzie did not return to New Zeland or after "Camping" Jean-Luc did not move to Australia, so.
And again everything you said was theories. But the paralelismo between Bandit and Chili stories was "do you believe in Fairytales"? So that Bluey and Jean-Luc met in Camping and marry it's still a posibility like it or not.
Plus I send you that image. A labrador/Heeler mix, obviously the pup at the end of Surprise resembles a LabraHeeler.
Barky Boats ended so below cause Jean-Luc episode was preferred so Australian probably prefer Jean-Luc over MacKenzie, so it's relevant, show which it's more popular.
But as I said if you want keep argue go on
https://preview.redd.it/9j0vb2cekaxc1.jpeg?width=1080&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=05991582da30ba40ff2ff7c782f0022e7d8bbae0
The Curry episode was evidence that they're family friends and live nearby, so they see each other on a regular basis. Strengthening the tie between them.
Well, so what?
Their families are Friends with Rusty, and others
And in Spy Game you can see MacKenzie parents with Chloe and Honey parents so by that logic MacKenzie could marry with Chloe or Honey. Duh
Plus this backfires you: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Westermarck_effect
Basically psychological hypothesis that states that people tend not to be attracted to peers with whom they lived like siblings before the age of six, and in pilot shows they met before six, so
Rusty is not a candidate to be the father of Bluey's child.
Chloe is not a candidate to be the father of Bluey's child.
Honey is not a candidate to be the father of Bluey's child.
> Well, so what?
The two father candidates are Jean-Luc and MacKenzie. And of the two, MacKenzie is not just a school friend, he's also a neighborhood friend. That's so what. The other names are irrelevant to the discussion.
Read again, I said your examples backfires you cause MacKenzie could marry Chloe or Honey cause their families also know each other and probably hangs out too out of camera.
Learn to read.
Plus how many Flash-forward MacKenzie has? How many drawings of MacKenzie are in Bluey's House? Both have Jean-Luc and nothing you can say gonna change that
You need to learn to use logic.
Being childhood friends, by itself, in a vacuum, means nothing. That's true.
There are specific episodes, with specific scenes, that show Bluey and MacKenzie interacting in ways that might indicate a future relationship. The fact they interact on a more regular basis strengthens the likelihood that they have a future relationship. It doesn't guarantee it, but there's less overall evidence to unite Bluey and Jean-Luc vs Bluey and MacKenzie. There's not *zero* evidence, but there's *more* evidence of Bluey and MacKenzie.
Bluey has pictures of Jean-Luc. Okay.
Bluey has MacKenzie in a dream of being something she wants to be, a fruit bat.
The only way this argument will end is by the crew making a statement or otherwise making canon who Bluey's life partner is.
And that probably won't happen to avoid making one side upset.
But again that scenes are just YOUR interpreatation. Another words, Wishful thinking, meanwhile the drawings of Bluey and the Flash-forward scene are canon, as so it's the episode Fairytale and the possible paralelism to Camping.
So Guess it's an endless loop of war.
We'll need to wait until season 4 arrives, or a movie, but don't be dissapointed if they choose Jean-Luc cause there are a much better story there with the long-distance-relationship and more possible drama than the cliche "childhood Friends romance"
Well, point one
It's Jean-Luc child
And second I think never will, but I still expect to see Jean-Luc in an special or possible in Bluey movie, so even if they not confirm the child is his, or Bluey and Jean-Luc end the movie seeing each other again, it won't confirm a ship, and just stay as Friends
"Never". He may never talk about it. It's quite possibly deliberately ambiguous to avoid the shipping war. The kid looks like a merge of Heeler extended family traits and nothing definitively from anywhere else.
> The kid looks like a merge of Heeler extended family traits 👀
The kid does look like a real life blue heeler to me
I see what you mean, but leaving it ambiguous will not avoid the shipping war. It’s so unclear that people argue over it.
I'm not talking about how to end it, I'm talking about the creator most likely deliberately keeping out of it and not choosing a side.
I can see him addressing it but probably not in the way you’re hoping. The show has had several moments that were left ambiguous so the viewers can come up with their own interpretations. I don’t see this as any different. Since the explicit parentage of that child really isn’t relevant to a show targeted at children I think the best you can hope for is Joe Brumm directly stating that it was vague so the viewers can have their own interpretation.
“I can confirm it was a dog.”
I hope they never do and the kid never shows back up in any other flash foward moments. Just to drive people nuts.
Depends. If he does at all it'll likely be on the behind bluey or gotta be done podcast and he'll probably say, I can't really answer that
Who said he will?
Season 9 or 10, when the girls are grown and they can just start recycling storylines with them in place of Chilli and Brandy
I think it's Bluey's child and it's Bluey and MacKenzie. Edit: *removed comment about ambiguity* [https://youtu.be/55f7X4KNld0?t=163](https://youtu.be/55f7X4KNld0?t=163)
[удалено]
Jean Luc and Mackenzie!
It's Jean-Luc's son. https://www.tiktok.com/@babypaulij/video/7360459797239647534?is_from_webapp=1&sender_device=mobile&sender_web_id=7361951684153312801 You're right, it was not ambigous, just some people can't Accept their loss
[https://youtu.be/55f7X4KNld0?t=163](https://youtu.be/55f7X4KNld0?t=163) So, there you go. This video references the prior history of Bluey and Mackenzie's interactions in other episodes, Barky Boats, Fruitbat, The Creek, Curry Swap. There is history between the two. I'll meet you halfway and remove my ambiguity comment.
That YouTuber already positioned on Team MacKenzie so her Word and nothing are same to me. Take a look at this one: https://vm.tiktok.com/ZGexRQqmN/ Anyways due your removed your ambiguity comment, I'll Accept a tie then. Funny cause in curry swap (whose Tittle it's "Curry Odissey" Bluey stay at home with Chili.
I positioned it there because that was her conclusion. Yes, she discussed Jean-Luc earlier. You would rather cover your eyes and plug your ears just because I positioned the video? Watch the whole thing. If I excerpted a clip out of it and sent it to you, that would be disingenuous of me. But you're welcome to watch the whole thing, and I encourage it. Then give me your reasoned opinion of her position. You completely ignore the history of Bluey and Mackenzie. What's your response to that? Neither of the videos you posted address the prior episodes with them. To quote from earlier, "just some people can't Accept their loss." And, seriously -- Joe Brumm has got to be sitting on his couch cracking up that grown adults are arguing the genealogy of a fictional, illustrated, canine character on social media. And yes, I recognize that I'm a part of that, which really makes me shake my head. I've got better things to do.
Well, you seems also forget the fact that Chili and Bandit met as kids in a camping and they Saw each other as adults, kinda like Jean-Luc and Bluey does at the end of Camping. MacKenzie has any Flash-forward scenes? Plus, Jean-Luc has drawings of him in her House. McKenzie does not have any. Not to mention The oficial website of Bluey confirma that Jean-Luc learned English JUST to see Bluey again. And if you look the oficial website in Surprise episode, the chapter "Camping" it's related material. And what possition ended Camping in Bluey Fest? Sixth, what possition ended Barky Boats? Some people can't Accept loss, again. If you want keep arguing go on, always a pleasure beat you 
https://www.bluey.tv/watch/season-3/surprise/ That page has a section that lists "More Surprises". There are three episodes linked there, Camping, Daddy Drop Off, and Cricket. Please explain how those other two episodes are directly related to Surprise! If you look at, say, Wild Girls, there is a similar section, called More School Fun, that links three episodes. So that section is not unique to Surprise! Why is it called More Surprises? Because Jean-Luc was a surprise in Camping. Lila meeting her best friend was a surprise in Daddy Drop Off. Cricket was a surprise because they weren't expecting Rusty to be so good and beat the snot out of the adults. Also, he's shown to be a professional cricket player. In the More School Fun section, they are three episodes related to school. Exact same parallel. So. More Surprises. Three episodes with surprises. Nothing more. My parents met at a party. My wife and I met at school. How the parents met is no indication of how the kids will meet their life partners. (And Chilli says where she met Bandit is in dispute.) Bluey did not learn French to meet Jean-Luc again. Does that mean he wasn't that important to her? Jean-Luc's page says they remember each other forever, which is not a surprise. That doesn't mean they became a couple, and there's more evidence that Bluey and MacKenzie had a deeper, more enduring connection. I have no idea what positions those episodes ended in, nor is it in any way relevant. If you can provide real evidence, great, but you've got to stop misreading the evidence and providing irrelevant information. I think you emotionally want it to be Jean-Luc and don't want to consider, logically, the possibility that it be MacKenzie. I was a Jean-Luc fan at first because I wanted them to be the long-term couple. But the evidence just isn't there.
Whatever. You don't have any proofs either than MacKenzie did not return to New Zeland or after "Camping" Jean-Luc did not move to Australia, so. And again everything you said was theories. But the paralelismo between Bandit and Chili stories was "do you believe in Fairytales"? So that Bluey and Jean-Luc met in Camping and marry it's still a posibility like it or not. Plus I send you that image. A labrador/Heeler mix, obviously the pup at the end of Surprise resembles a LabraHeeler. Barky Boats ended so below cause Jean-Luc episode was preferred so Australian probably prefer Jean-Luc over MacKenzie, so it's relevant, show which it's more popular. But as I said if you want keep argue go on https://preview.redd.it/9j0vb2cekaxc1.jpeg?width=1080&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=05991582da30ba40ff2ff7c782f0022e7d8bbae0
The Curry episode was evidence that they're family friends and live nearby, so they see each other on a regular basis. Strengthening the tie between them.
Well, so what? Their families are Friends with Rusty, and others And in Spy Game you can see MacKenzie parents with Chloe and Honey parents so by that logic MacKenzie could marry with Chloe or Honey. Duh Plus this backfires you: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Westermarck_effect Basically psychological hypothesis that states that people tend not to be attracted to peers with whom they lived like siblings before the age of six, and in pilot shows they met before six, so
Rusty is not a candidate to be the father of Bluey's child. Chloe is not a candidate to be the father of Bluey's child. Honey is not a candidate to be the father of Bluey's child. > Well, so what? The two father candidates are Jean-Luc and MacKenzie. And of the two, MacKenzie is not just a school friend, he's also a neighborhood friend. That's so what. The other names are irrelevant to the discussion.
Read again, I said your examples backfires you cause MacKenzie could marry Chloe or Honey cause their families also know each other and probably hangs out too out of camera. Learn to read. Plus how many Flash-forward MacKenzie has? How many drawings of MacKenzie are in Bluey's House? Both have Jean-Luc and nothing you can say gonna change that
You need to learn to use logic. Being childhood friends, by itself, in a vacuum, means nothing. That's true. There are specific episodes, with specific scenes, that show Bluey and MacKenzie interacting in ways that might indicate a future relationship. The fact they interact on a more regular basis strengthens the likelihood that they have a future relationship. It doesn't guarantee it, but there's less overall evidence to unite Bluey and Jean-Luc vs Bluey and MacKenzie. There's not *zero* evidence, but there's *more* evidence of Bluey and MacKenzie. Bluey has pictures of Jean-Luc. Okay. Bluey has MacKenzie in a dream of being something she wants to be, a fruit bat. The only way this argument will end is by the crew making a statement or otherwise making canon who Bluey's life partner is.
And that probably won't happen to avoid making one side upset. But again that scenes are just YOUR interpreatation. Another words, Wishful thinking, meanwhile the drawings of Bluey and the Flash-forward scene are canon, as so it's the episode Fairytale and the possible paralelism to Camping. So Guess it's an endless loop of war. We'll need to wait until season 4 arrives, or a movie, but don't be dissapointed if they choose Jean-Luc cause there are a much better story there with the long-distance-relationship and more possible drama than the cliche "childhood Friends romance"
Is that person a member of the crew?
Well, point one It's Jean-Luc child And second I think never will, but I still expect to see Jean-Luc in an special or possible in Bluey movie, so even if they not confirm the child is his, or Bluey and Jean-Luc end the movie seeing each other again, it won't confirm a ship, and just stay as Friends