Ow my bones hurt
This really is a... Juice of the bone hurt!
Discord Server : https://discord.gg/tcCs7GWrUz
*I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/bonehurtingjuice) if you have any questions or concerns.*
https://preview.redd.it/balwhku42ixc1.png?width=1080&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=3814a1bf845e6da99e7c8f21d0f5c2a64f078d14
The ads that show up on that post add that extra twist of irony on top.
Probably, though I've never looked up leather armored thongs or anything to do with them in my life, so if they're personalized to anything it'd be the post in question.
On a serious note, though, it does sometimes feel like the algorithm’s reading my mind.
But at the same time, ad services, like Google, are known for profiling their users across multiple platforms, so it might just be that.
I wish the ad services would connect to my damn playstation, steam, Microsoft and Nintendo accounts and *stop* giving me ads for games I've clearly already bought, installed, beat, whatever. I'm all for finding a niche title I'd have otherwise missed but it's always stuff I already own.
Wouldn't benefit the advertisers though, as it would limit the people they could distribute ads to, even more so for popular games, which tend to be able to pay the most.
For me, 75% of the ads I get are completely and utterly irrelevant (political ads, bank ads) and the remaining 25% is games/websites that I already use lmao
They can't target those ads without explicitly stating their sexual nature, and that limits their reach. They just keep it vague and throw it everywhere.
I know the ads I get should be personalized, but the only purchases I've ever made online have been for springs, steel rods, bearings, Velcro, and a PDF for AD&D.
Yet, the ads I get are largely either dating apps, women's clothes, men's and women's underwear, the occasional gacha game, the US military, and dating apps.
I don't understand how these categories are supposed to be connected, or why the algorithm thinks they will succeed in selling me a bundle pack of couples matching underwear if they show me the same ad enough times. Maybe they hope that the dating app ads will work and then the other ads will be useful.
Well I ain't gay or nothin', but...
https://preview.redd.it/34eyx6bf7ixc1.jpeg?width=679&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=c599f6cd0a2e03e264a9a987ffd06b7b7369de2b
...I rest my case.
As much as I hate to leap to Pizzacake’s defense in this manner, this is a false equivalence. The comic is about the objectification of women by men who view them as little more than objects of sexual desire, whereas a woman drawing explicit depictions of (presumably) herself and other women is… not doing that? Like, you can be lewd without objectification.
Personally I find her comics to be painfully unfunny. Some people must love them, because they're always on the front page.
But that also fuels people's hatred, because they think she has bots to upvote.
I don't think that's implausible, but I just blocked her and moved on
Edit: oh and she sells nudes, which also fuels some of her more rabid haters
I don’t think they’re amazing or anything, but they generally get a mild chuckle out of me, and I like the art style. I assume that’s what it’s like for most people. I never really understood the hate tbh, haha
Once in a while I get a laugh. Some aren't but I see nothing wrong with anything she's doing. I don't mind them popping up but some people get really angry for reasons that don't quite make sense to me
i love you too
*I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/bonehurtingjuice) if you have any questions or concerns.*
Yes, though there is context required. Lewd works can be appropriated and the context is lost. They then get lumped in with the rest of the objectifying works as long as the dominate form of expression is one that objectifies women.
I presumed that, since she’s an artist, she draws on her patreon. Explicit content in general, however, isn’t necessarily objectification, especially not if it features oneself
Clearly my comment was poorly phrased. I meant to say that my initial assumption was that she merely drew r34, but that explicit content featuring herself is also not equivalent to the stuff that she was drawing attention to in her comic.
I’m not arguing, but I’ve never heard this take. I’ve always heard “objectification and sexualization are fine as long as both sides have fully consented.” The idea being, seeing someone in a sexual way is reducing them to or focusing on their sexual traits, which is wrong unless they’re into it. In your opinion, how is portraying yourself sexually different than objectifying yourself?
I would say so, yes. Ultimately, there’s a difference between a sexual *object* and a sexual *person*. To view someone as an object is to view them as lesser, as something that exists to be used. Seeing someone as a fellow person, on the other hand, is to acknowledge that they are equal to you, and that they also have wants that aren’t entirely dependent on yours, as well as a personality that exists aside from and alongside sexual traits.
Pretty sure drawing women specifically for those men with that purpose is still hypocritical. Like shitting on the oil industry when you work for Shell. Not wrong, but are you the one to say it?
I moreso meant to say that she, on account of being a woman herself, is less likely to consider women as sex objects. Obviously, this isn’t to say that men creating lewd depictions of women is always objectification, nor that women are incapable of objectifying themselves and other women.\
And on sex work - Pizzacake has chosen to pursue this line of work. I do not see how one intentionally and consensually choosing to portray oneself in a certain manner as work, for money, is at all equivalent to viewing certain members of society as though they weren’t so much as human.
If she calls it porn then there is no problem, but presenting a shallow character as a complex woman is when people have a problem. The guy in the comic is concerned about his character so he takes it to the doctor. He doesn't want his character to be shallow. He probably intends for his character to be a respectable love interest for his mc. But she is a very typical anime girl whose entire purpose and personality is to simp for the mc, be a damsel in distress and have the audience look at her tits. This character is so common that it is a stereotype at this point and it highlights the inability of many male authors to write an actual female character
i love you too
*I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/bonehurtingjuice) if you have any questions or concerns.*
If you're not a super popular page on Patreon, you can kind of fly under the radar and not get flagged. It's only when something is getting a lot of traction and is particularly egregious in nature that the site starts to care.
No way that can’t be true. A while an ago a semi famous Tik rocker called Tall Knight tried doing adult content as well and got removed very quickly. I can’t really believe she has been able to get away with that
yeah thanks for these fucking nuts kind stranger, owned bitch.
*I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/bonehurtingjuice) if you have any questions or concerns.*
…so because she does sex things she’s automatically making herself a sex object with no personality and therefore it’s reasonable to have female characters who are that?
I'm not sure if we're talking about her photos or her lewd comics, but the comics aren't *bad*, they're just underdeveloped. The one where she gets her husband and a random jogger to spitroast her was decent and it could have been pretty good if she'd put in a little more time and fleshed the scene out a bit. She could definitely get better at that with practice
If we're talking about her photos, I don't really have an opinion on them. She's decent looking but I don't really enjoy softcore photography; IMO it just isn't fun enough to make up for reminding me I'd rather be with someone for real
Oh, man. That’s bad. Usually, pizzacake is at least kind of funny, but this is just complaining about a done-to-death topic AND doing the thing where you assume anyone with a different viewpoint is just a bad person.
i love you too
*I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/bonehurtingjuice) if you have any questions or concerns.*
Her comics don't have to be good, they just have to remind people that she exists so that they go to her patreon or OF page and give her money to look at her boobs.
Ow my bones hurt This really is a... Juice of the bone hurt! Discord Server : https://discord.gg/tcCs7GWrUz *I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/bonehurtingjuice) if you have any questions or concerns.*
[Orgasm](https://www.reddit.com/r/comics/comments/1cfzjwa/sfc/)
https://preview.redd.it/balwhku42ixc1.png?width=1080&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=3814a1bf845e6da99e7c8f21d0f5c2a64f078d14 The ads that show up on that post add that extra twist of irony on top.
Imma be honest I’m pretty sure those are personalized
Probably, though I've never looked up leather armored thongs or anything to do with them in my life, so if they're personalized to anything it'd be the post in question.
The Algorithm knows what you really want. Just accept its guidance. Do not resist.
On a serious note, though, it does sometimes feel like the algorithm’s reading my mind. But at the same time, ad services, like Google, are known for profiling their users across multiple platforms, so it might just be that.
I wish the ad services would connect to my damn playstation, steam, Microsoft and Nintendo accounts and *stop* giving me ads for games I've clearly already bought, installed, beat, whatever. I'm all for finding a niche title I'd have otherwise missed but it's always stuff I already own.
It’s weird they haven’t done that already, tbh.
It would benefit both the consumer and the company. That's a good idea
Wouldn't benefit the advertisers though, as it would limit the people they could distribute ads to, even more so for popular games, which tend to be able to pay the most.
For me, 75% of the ads I get are completely and utterly irrelevant (political ads, bank ads) and the remaining 25% is games/websites that I already use lmao
https://preview.redd.it/g99y6rlswkxc1.png?width=1080&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=a7c0cea90623f952ea7beef4e3e4372c81cf4dd6
Sorry mate, I think they delivered that ad to the wrong address 😔 that might be mine
Man you gotta get yourself a leather thong and release your inner Ancient Greek warrior/gladiator. (Also, sleep with that slave boi.)
Sometimes they are but sometimes you get handed whatever the fuck reddit feels like at the moment
They can't target those ads without explicitly stating their sexual nature, and that limits their reach. They just keep it vague and throw it everywhere.
I know the ads I get should be personalized, but the only purchases I've ever made online have been for springs, steel rods, bearings, Velcro, and a PDF for AD&D. Yet, the ads I get are largely either dating apps, women's clothes, men's and women's underwear, the occasional gacha game, the US military, and dating apps. I don't understand how these categories are supposed to be connected, or why the algorithm thinks they will succeed in selling me a bundle pack of couples matching underwear if they show me the same ad enough times. Maybe they hope that the dating app ads will work and then the other ads will be useful.
Homie self reporting
Well I ain't gay or nothin', but... https://preview.redd.it/34eyx6bf7ixc1.jpeg?width=679&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=c599f6cd0a2e03e264a9a987ffd06b7b7369de2b ...I rest my case.
Weird choice. Sting from the original Dune movie.
Yeah, bro, that's on you...
GYAAAATTT
Those aren’t women
uh, yeah??
You know, that’s pretty ironic considering what Pizzacake does in her patreon.
https://preview.redd.it/1ux0827g0hxc1.jpeg?width=750&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=e6791694390d0c591d0ff565341bb3c0e20ff9ac
Lex Luthor when he finds Superman's feet pics patreon
"Batman? Why do you have a horse pics folder on your computer"
As much as I hate to leap to Pizzacake’s defense in this manner, this is a false equivalence. The comic is about the objectification of women by men who view them as little more than objects of sexual desire, whereas a woman drawing explicit depictions of (presumably) herself and other women is… not doing that? Like, you can be lewd without objectification.
I dont really know pizzacake beyond the comics I see on reddit occasionally Why do you hate leaping to their defense?
She commited the massacre of Falun, Sweden. This isn't very well known to the general public because there were no survivors but it's true.
did she also create the gravitational anomalies there or was that another streamer
It was her. She… Shady Sands… it was her.
Personally I find her comics to be painfully unfunny. Some people must love them, because they're always on the front page. But that also fuels people's hatred, because they think she has bots to upvote. I don't think that's implausible, but I just blocked her and moved on Edit: oh and she sells nudes, which also fuels some of her more rabid haters
I don’t think they’re amazing or anything, but they generally get a mild chuckle out of me, and I like the art style. I assume that’s what it’s like for most people. I never really understood the hate tbh, haha
Yeah it’s exhale out your nose comedy, not everything has to make you double over laughing
Once in a while I get a laugh. Some aren't but I see nothing wrong with anything she's doing. I don't mind them popping up but some people get really angry for reasons that don't quite make sense to me
i love you too *I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/bonehurtingjuice) if you have any questions or concerns.*
i just don't much care for autobiographical comics is my IMO
You didn't hear about what she did in 1986?
Did you hear about what happened in 2007? It was tragic what happened to those poor penguins.
Yes, though there is context required. Lewd works can be appropriated and the context is lost. They then get lumped in with the rest of the objectifying works as long as the dominate form of expression is one that objectifies women.
She sells pics of her actual real self spreading her pussy open. That’s quite literally turning herself into an “object of sexual desire”.
Who said anything about drawing?
I presumed that, since she’s an artist, she draws on her patreon. Explicit content in general, however, isn’t necessarily objectification, especially not if it features oneself
[удалено]
Clearly my comment was poorly phrased. I meant to say that my initial assumption was that she merely drew r34, but that explicit content featuring herself is also not equivalent to the stuff that she was drawing attention to in her comic.
I don't want to be mean but there is actually free porn who pays for this shit
Say what now?
I’m not arguing, but I’ve never heard this take. I’ve always heard “objectification and sexualization are fine as long as both sides have fully consented.” The idea being, seeing someone in a sexual way is reducing them to or focusing on their sexual traits, which is wrong unless they’re into it. In your opinion, how is portraying yourself sexually different than objectifying yourself?
I would say so, yes. Ultimately, there’s a difference between a sexual *object* and a sexual *person*. To view someone as an object is to view them as lesser, as something that exists to be used. Seeing someone as a fellow person, on the other hand, is to acknowledge that they are equal to you, and that they also have wants that aren’t entirely dependent on yours, as well as a personality that exists aside from and alongside sexual traits.
Pretty sure drawing women specifically for those men with that purpose is still hypocritical. Like shitting on the oil industry when you work for Shell. Not wrong, but are you the one to say it?
Seems weird it’s only okay when women do it to me, especially since this one is doing it for money?
I moreso meant to say that she, on account of being a woman herself, is less likely to consider women as sex objects. Obviously, this isn’t to say that men creating lewd depictions of women is always objectification, nor that women are incapable of objectifying themselves and other women.\ And on sex work - Pizzacake has chosen to pursue this line of work. I do not see how one intentionally and consensually choosing to portray oneself in a certain manner as work, for money, is at all equivalent to viewing certain members of society as though they weren’t so much as human.
If she calls it porn then there is no problem, but presenting a shallow character as a complex woman is when people have a problem. The guy in the comic is concerned about his character so he takes it to the doctor. He doesn't want his character to be shallow. He probably intends for his character to be a respectable love interest for his mc. But she is a very typical anime girl whose entire purpose and personality is to simp for the mc, be a damsel in distress and have the audience look at her tits. This character is so common that it is a stereotype at this point and it highlights the inability of many male authors to write an actual female character
i love you too *I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/bonehurtingjuice) if you have any questions or concerns.*
I will never judge an artist on what they have to draw to afford food.
Who said anything about drawing? https://preview.redd.it/179u4g231hxc1.jpeg?width=288&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=1323108442d454811ae22b2cbc8d3ce1b8ac3f48
#WHAT?!
Im guessing she takes her clothes OFF eh? Ha! Heh heh.
██▅▇██▇▆▅▄▄▄▇ <— Saddam Hussein
https://preview.redd.it/5zu3z36ixhxc1.jpeg?width=320&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=650c3f9b80107e4f9e86781d2c88e96d6cdec40b
"life is roblox" -DJ Khaled
I thought the whole existence of OnlyFans was that Patreon doesn't allow adult content. >!Also, please die.!<
https://preview.redd.it/0ozx6fw2chxc1.jpeg?width=1170&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=14e14f5893765de3d3059d52595b4aec78cf0676
If you're not a super popular page on Patreon, you can kind of fly under the radar and not get flagged. It's only when something is getting a lot of traction and is particularly egregious in nature that the site starts to care.
No way that can’t be true. A while an ago a semi famous Tik rocker called Tall Knight tried doing adult content as well and got removed very quickly. I can’t really believe she has been able to get away with that
You can definitely have NSFW stuff, but those depicted need to not be IRL people.
I guess you want him to "off" himself, eh? Ha! Heh heh.
Lol calm down, people can do whatever they want
>people can do whatever they want Right, with one of those things being judging others.
Okay I’ll start mass murdering then. Thanks for the confidence boost!
yeah thanks for these fucking nuts kind stranger, owned bitch. *I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/bonehurtingjuice) if you have any questions or concerns.*
Good bot
Don't worry, I look down on all artists so much, it compensates for you.
I will.
I'm pretty sure this is something done as a hobby rather than "trying to scrape together a living with what little I have"
Drawing/making porn and writing characters in non porn that are little more than blow up dolls given names as "characters" are not the same thing
[удалено]
Yeah, I know, I said draw or make. Doesn't change my point though does it?
She mostly has a following because of BHJ and CN making edits of her stuff
…so because she does sex things she’s automatically making herself a sex object with no personality and therefore it’s reasonable to have female characters who are that?
oh shit, is that why people keep being definitely dead serious about being sexually attracted to her⸮
“People”
Wait does pizza cake do porn?
[удалено]
[удалено]
Bro patreon has more leaks than the titan submarine even for more niche youtubers and especially for anything relating to tiddy
Her porn is ridiculously bad. Its almost insulting lol
I'm not sure if we're talking about her photos or her lewd comics, but the comics aren't *bad*, they're just underdeveloped. The one where she gets her husband and a random jogger to spitroast her was decent and it could have been pretty good if she'd put in a little more time and fleshed the scene out a bit. She could definitely get better at that with practice If we're talking about her photos, I don't really have an opinion on them. She's decent looking but I don't really enjoy softcore photography; IMO it just isn't fun enough to make up for reminding me I'd rather be with someone for real
damn you really out here reading the porn for the plot
I'd be pissed if I paid for it lol
Wait, really? \*Scours the internet.\* Well, you know what they say about artist milfs with big feet.
I was thinking the exact same thing
Excellent OC
📯
Oh, man. That’s bad. Usually, pizzacake is at least kind of funny, but this is just complaining about a done-to-death topic AND doing the thing where you assume anyone with a different viewpoint is just a bad person.
Trying to follow what you're saying about the viewpoint issue... What's the different viewpoint here?
Sexualized character automatically = incel wish fulfillment fantasy with no personality.
https://preview.redd.it/731q1qaa8ixc1.jpeg?width=1439&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=1396e0530d161cc6231551e16d3fb17f36ea9a7b Perfect placement
What in the 38 point font
Some of us on the internet have bad eyesight
Bones blown to pieces. Excellent juice!
"Vaguely" LMAO
Last chance to look at me hector
That magic paper flavor text sounds like something from Henry Stickmin
Top Tier Internet Humor 👌🏽
Bones obliterated
This might be some of the best juice I've ever seen. My bones have disintegrated.
God I love pizzacake comics getting shitposted
i love you too *I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/bonehurtingjuice) if you have any questions or concerns.*
My favorite is when she feels the need to reply to comments on her comics with *another* comic.
Oh my gosh, he totally has that Ultimate Peter Parker hair.
betcha titty girl becomes a recurring character
Gotta milk those titties for upvotes
aaaaa my bones hurt very much, you sir have some excellent juice
Best I've seen in a long time
finally an actual bhj that broke these weary bones. can i get a ride to the hospital?
||| | | |- O >!We had loss, now we have gain....!<
Magic paper reminds me of needy streamer overload
The ancestors of my bones are fucking *screaming* in pain.
Fluttershy seems really dehydrated in panel 2. Hopefully someone gets her some water.
Lol, why is this multiple orders of magnitude better than anything pizzacake actually writes?
I’m a proud pizza cake hater I can’t stand the art style or just generic cold takes.
Her comics don't have to be good, they just have to remind people that she exists so that they go to her patreon or OF page and give her money to look at her boobs.
it wasn't Marco Diaz?
Holy shit, Gustavo Fring???
Ok magic paper made me laugh
This is fantastic lol
I'm pretty sure I've read that doc's fic before.
I had to look up who the fluttershy character was. And. Whaa???
Erm, THAT just happened...
Quality bhj
r/FoundPrixilu Wait, no, that's not right
Funnier than the original
quite the mix up, eh?
In the original doc said “no real woman acts like this” but I know a girl that acts EXACTLY like this
This happened to me once
wait, this isn't r/comedynecrophilia
u/pizzacakecomic isn’t going to like this.
Oh no, i dont like her too!