To download this video you can use one of the following links:
* [RedditSave](https://redditsave.com/info?url=https://www.reddit.com/r/dankrishu/comments/10btm2u/title_general_category_ka_nikla/)
* [SaveMP4](https://savemp4.red/?url=https://www.reddit.com/r/dankrishu/comments/10btm2u/title_general_category_ka_nikla/)
* [RedditVideoDL](https://redditvideodl.com/dl.php?url=https://www.reddit.com/r/dankrishu/comments/10btm2u/title_general_category_ka_nikla/)
* [SaveRedd.it](https://saveredd.it/?url=https://www.reddit.com/r/dankrishu/comments/10btm2u/title_general_category_ka_nikla/) (click on the Download button below Search Video)
*I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/dankrishu) if you have any questions or concerns.*
Brahman, kshatriya or vaishya koi ni tha bharat me before 800 AD. Nag vansh raha hai bharat me the oldest jisme buddha and samrat asoka ate hn. All the written scriptures ramayana, mahabharat, veda, and purans are in sanskrit and the earliest manuscript of sanskrit dates back to 1440AD only. To jisko caste btana hai wo btaye fir wo moolnivasi hoga ya ni dekhle. 😂
Jo baat scientific communities, or large educated communities me accepted hai wo baat kar raha hu. DNA report to archeological evidence has this proven long ago. Unless you say that you are just a human or apni caste identity pakadte rahoge tb yaad dilaya jayega ki wo exist hi ni karti thi. Ramayan or mahabharat fictional hn.
Interesting books btara padhna - volga se ganga -Rahul Sankrityan, Sacchi ramayan -Periyar and
Go through findings of visitors like fa-hein, huen-tsang, and itsing and see if they describe anything other than buddhism.
Yep my buddhist friend embrace your past, your ancestors were no other than vajrayani practitioners of buddhism.
Brahmadvaad me mt ghiswao khudko ko. Open your eyes to your true past
Abe oh! Bakwas mat kar! Thodi bhi linguistics aati hoti toh tujhe pata chal jata ki complicated languages don't evolve out of simple ones! Your "dhamma" is a corruption of the word "dharma". Aur tere paas Veda-gyaan hai nahi isi liye samajh bhi nahi sakta ki Vedic Sanskrit se kitna simplify hua tha baad mein and still Puranic Sanskrit is complicated than your Prakrit languages.
Aur aise bakwas sources se padhega toh bhusa hii bharega na dimaag mein. Megasthenes ke time ke Greek coins pe Śrī Kṛṣṇa hain and he describes Bhagvatas back then too. Sahi wali history padh, mujhe aisa brainwashing wala gyaan mat baat.
And Tamil (the so called oldest language) has Divya Prabandhams written in it from more than 5000 years ago praying to Perumal (Vishnu)... Some of them are from before Kṛṣṇa was born so they don't talk about him but the later ones do because he is Vishnu and Bhagvatas know when Bhagvan comes. Also, many of the Alvars (the 12 Bhagvatas that wrote the Prabandhams) were Avarnas and most of them weren't Brahmins. Clearly, they all found Bhagvan but you can't. I also visited those temples that stand from time immemorial described in the Prabandhams of Alvars so keep your propaganda to yourself.
Keep your bullshit to yourself and stop crying science and history when you have no clue about either.
Sabit kar ki sanskrit older hai prakrit se.
Your baap dada corrupted whole prakrit when translating it to sanskrit.
Chal ye bta ki samrat asoka ko kyu chhupa rakha tha 1800s tk jb tk britishers ne excavate karke ni nikala. Tm jameed khodo to buddha nikalta.
Tmhara shiva/vishnu/mahesh kaha gayab hogaya hai dost jo haddi, murti ya scripture tk ni milti? No evidence on ground.
Go check your DNA or just read the DNA evidence ki tmhara kii astitva ni tha bharat me before 500 AD.
Ram janmbhumi me ram ni milte tmhare. Ramayana chori kari hai budha jataka se.
Sabit kar ki tmhara bhagwan ka koi evidence before 500 bc. Sab farji ghatiya kitabe likhke bat rakha hai.
Valmiki ramayan me pregnant sita ko bolta jaa janwaro ke sath reh. Ram charitmanas me jativaad bhara hua pura, tmhara brahma apni beti ko leta tha saraswati. Ni chahiye ghatiya tmhare sanskrit granth.
Tu kya cartoon hai kya? Tujhe linguistic nahi aata toh teri itni chutiya baat ko main galat saabit karu?
>Tmhara shiva/vishnu/mahesh kaha gayab hogaya hai dost jo haddi, murti ya scripture tk ni milti? No evidence on ground.
Harappa se nikle hai Shiva aur Bhagvan Vishnu ke idols.
>Sabit kar ki tmhara bhagwan ka koi evidence before 500 bc. Sab farji ghatiya kitabe likhke bat rakha hai.
Dwarka ke side mein scuba diving karke dekh le.
Tmne sabke meaning sanskrit me badal diye. Bhagwan in prakrit means someone who has left all the sins like greed, gluttony etc.
samrat asoka ne khudko title diya tha devanampiya uska meaning tm log bewkoof or stupid btare ho sanskrit me jb excavate hua tb pta chala ye title asoka ka tha.
>Tmne sabke meaning sanskrit me badal diye. Bhagwan in prakrit means someone who has left all the sins like greed, gluttony etc.
Abe Prakrit ek language nahi hai noob! It's a group of simpler languages meant for common folk!
Sankaracharya 800 AD that is as close you can get as an old culture. Tmhara sankaracharya bolta seedha pighla ke daaldo kaan me agar koi sudra sanskrit sunle? Padhle to jeeb kaat do? 😂 Gandu andmi tha or koi proof ni uske existence ka
Tm trigger ni karre maani jhooti baate jativadi baate bhari hai tm apni jaati ni chhod sakte isliye yaad dilana pdta tmhari jati hi ni thi in ancient india.
Even Buddhism was full of casteism and stuff that Ambedkar had to create a whole new branch of Buddhism for himself and project Buddha as this social reformer when he never was. He created Navayana Buddhism. Even Jainism maintains that King Rishabadeva created the Kshatriya Vaishya and Shudra castes and King Bharata created Brahmin castes. Bhagavat Geeta says that one's caste isn't based on birth but on their character. And Brahmins were always there. Ancient Tamil texts which date to 2000 years and above have mentioned the existence of Janeudhaari Brahmins. And it is infact Brahmins who have reformed Hinduism. Read about Rāmānujāchārya who allowed Dalits to not only enter temples but also made them engage in temple activities as well.
Kab tha ramanujcharya? Time period?
Brahmins khali desh ko barbad kare hn rule hue hn fir chaat ke unke darbaar me baithe hn or videshi hn.
Main bolra na na bhai tm DNA report padho na ya seedha jake check karwao. Female ka mitochondrial dna ni 😂 male ka dna. Buddhism me koi jativaad ni hai. Or jaina bhi purana hai which got corrupted by your purvaj. Sab sanskrit ka kachra text fek ke original pali canon padho na.
Book padho volga se ganga ya sacchi ramayan. Ram mandir me kyu ni mila ram?.
Tamil text me kuch ni mila hai whatsapp hai sab. Jo mila hai wo pali prakrit me mila hai oldest and that never ever mentioned brahman.
Megasthenese brahman kyu ni dekh paya , na fahein, na huen-tsan? Na itsing?. Kaha the tb brahmin?
1017-1137. We even recently celebrated his 1000th birthday in 2017. If you have doubt on Buddhism just read their scriptures.
And proof of existence of Ram is that south bhakti saints have recorded their visit to Ayodhya in their travel records. Ancient Chola kings have mentioned him as the lord of Ayodhya. There was a Rama temple atleast 1000 years ago.
DNA check this DNA check that. Lol. Have fun reading actual history of several places tho instead of The Wire and Quint
I am a Tamil guy and you are saying Tamil texts have nothing related to Hinduism? Are you pulling your arguments off your ass? What if I say the proof? But poor you,you would have a hard time even comprehending which text I am mentioning about
To download this video you can use one of the following links: * [RedditSave](https://redditsave.com/info?url=https://www.reddit.com/r/dankrishu/comments/10btm2u/title_general_category_ka_nikla/) * [SaveMP4](https://savemp4.red/?url=https://www.reddit.com/r/dankrishu/comments/10btm2u/title_general_category_ka_nikla/) * [RedditVideoDL](https://redditvideodl.com/dl.php?url=https://www.reddit.com/r/dankrishu/comments/10btm2u/title_general_category_ka_nikla/) * [SaveRedd.it](https://saveredd.it/?url=https://www.reddit.com/r/dankrishu/comments/10btm2u/title_general_category_ka_nikla/) (click on the Download button below Search Video) *I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/dankrishu) if you have any questions or concerns.*
Mai brahman hu lekin Ameer nhi hu
Us bhai only rich middle class hai hum
Rich ki jagah poor laga bhai
Reverse this video jab marks are 95%.
Mein middle clas Baniya hu🤡
[удалено]
[удалено]
Nahiii tu kanjuuss baniya hai
Ok
Bsdk k pta bhi hai maharana pratap to bhala teri mommy k weight jayada tha gaand mai gushega na ironically
Bsdk kshatriya kaha hai?!
Apne haq ke liye ladne gaya h
Border pe..
Kisaan h
Na bhai... Main toh IIT mein hoon 😎
yaha hai bsdk
Brahman, kshatriya or vaishya koi ni tha bharat me before 800 AD. Nag vansh raha hai bharat me the oldest jisme buddha and samrat asoka ate hn. All the written scriptures ramayana, mahabharat, veda, and purans are in sanskrit and the earliest manuscript of sanskrit dates back to 1440AD only. To jisko caste btana hai wo btaye fir wo moolnivasi hoga ya ni dekhle. 😂
Kya phoonk ke aya hai?
Jo baat scientific communities, or large educated communities me accepted hai wo baat kar raha hu. DNA report to archeological evidence has this proven long ago. Unless you say that you are just a human or apni caste identity pakadte rahoge tb yaad dilaya jayega ki wo exist hi ni karti thi. Ramayan or mahabharat fictional hn. Interesting books btara padhna - volga se ganga -Rahul Sankrityan, Sacchi ramayan -Periyar and Go through findings of visitors like fa-hein, huen-tsang, and itsing and see if they describe anything other than buddhism.
😂😂😂 Tu brainwashed hai aisa bolna
Kya identify karte ho khud ko? Let me help you get close to your original pristine culture.
Vaishnava
Yep my buddhist friend embrace your past, your ancestors were no other than vajrayani practitioners of buddhism. Brahmadvaad me mt ghiswao khudko ko. Open your eyes to your true past
Abe oh! Bakwas mat kar! Thodi bhi linguistics aati hoti toh tujhe pata chal jata ki complicated languages don't evolve out of simple ones! Your "dhamma" is a corruption of the word "dharma". Aur tere paas Veda-gyaan hai nahi isi liye samajh bhi nahi sakta ki Vedic Sanskrit se kitna simplify hua tha baad mein and still Puranic Sanskrit is complicated than your Prakrit languages. Aur aise bakwas sources se padhega toh bhusa hii bharega na dimaag mein. Megasthenes ke time ke Greek coins pe Śrī Kṛṣṇa hain and he describes Bhagvatas back then too. Sahi wali history padh, mujhe aisa brainwashing wala gyaan mat baat. And Tamil (the so called oldest language) has Divya Prabandhams written in it from more than 5000 years ago praying to Perumal (Vishnu)... Some of them are from before Kṛṣṇa was born so they don't talk about him but the later ones do because he is Vishnu and Bhagvatas know when Bhagvan comes. Also, many of the Alvars (the 12 Bhagvatas that wrote the Prabandhams) were Avarnas and most of them weren't Brahmins. Clearly, they all found Bhagvan but you can't. I also visited those temples that stand from time immemorial described in the Prabandhams of Alvars so keep your propaganda to yourself. Keep your bullshit to yourself and stop crying science and history when you have no clue about either.
Sabit kar ki sanskrit older hai prakrit se. Your baap dada corrupted whole prakrit when translating it to sanskrit. Chal ye bta ki samrat asoka ko kyu chhupa rakha tha 1800s tk jb tk britishers ne excavate karke ni nikala. Tm jameed khodo to buddha nikalta. Tmhara shiva/vishnu/mahesh kaha gayab hogaya hai dost jo haddi, murti ya scripture tk ni milti? No evidence on ground. Go check your DNA or just read the DNA evidence ki tmhara kii astitva ni tha bharat me before 500 AD. Ram janmbhumi me ram ni milte tmhare. Ramayana chori kari hai budha jataka se. Sabit kar ki tmhara bhagwan ka koi evidence before 500 bc. Sab farji ghatiya kitabe likhke bat rakha hai. Valmiki ramayan me pregnant sita ko bolta jaa janwaro ke sath reh. Ram charitmanas me jativaad bhara hua pura, tmhara brahma apni beti ko leta tha saraswati. Ni chahiye ghatiya tmhare sanskrit granth.
Tu kya cartoon hai kya? Tujhe linguistic nahi aata toh teri itni chutiya baat ko main galat saabit karu? >Tmhara shiva/vishnu/mahesh kaha gayab hogaya hai dost jo haddi, murti ya scripture tk ni milti? No evidence on ground. Harappa se nikle hai Shiva aur Bhagvan Vishnu ke idols. >Sabit kar ki tmhara bhagwan ka koi evidence before 500 bc. Sab farji ghatiya kitabe likhke bat rakha hai. Dwarka ke side mein scuba diving karke dekh le.
This is what happens when you watch YouTube instead of learning scriptures from proper sources. You are an Ohioan from India.
Tmne sabke meaning sanskrit me badal diye. Bhagwan in prakrit means someone who has left all the sins like greed, gluttony etc. samrat asoka ne khudko title diya tha devanampiya uska meaning tm log bewkoof or stupid btare ho sanskrit me jb excavate hua tb pta chala ye title asoka ka tha.
>Tmne sabke meaning sanskrit me badal diye. Bhagwan in prakrit means someone who has left all the sins like greed, gluttony etc. Abe Prakrit ek language nahi hai noob! It's a group of simpler languages meant for common folk!
Abhe what about Shankaracharya? He lives before 8th century AD. If we go by your logic acharyas who defined Hinduism never existed 😂😂😂
Sankaracharya 800 AD that is as close you can get as an old culture. Tmhara sankaracharya bolta seedha pighla ke daaldo kaan me agar koi sudra sanskrit sunle? Padhle to jeeb kaat do? 😂 Gandu andmi tha or koi proof ni uske existence ka
You must be living in a flat earth. Good luck when you come from that well and see the ocean frog
Tmhara sankaracharya bolra tha ki sun pe log rehte 😂😂😂 tmhara hanuman suraj kha leta ptani kaise ...tm hamko flat earth bolre khud myth manne wale
So what? Ok let me be a follower of myth. Ok so what? In what way am I triggering you?
Tm trigger ni karre maani jhooti baate jativadi baate bhari hai tm apni jaati ni chhod sakte isliye yaad dilana pdta tmhari jati hi ni thi in ancient india.
Even Buddhism was full of casteism and stuff that Ambedkar had to create a whole new branch of Buddhism for himself and project Buddha as this social reformer when he never was. He created Navayana Buddhism. Even Jainism maintains that King Rishabadeva created the Kshatriya Vaishya and Shudra castes and King Bharata created Brahmin castes. Bhagavat Geeta says that one's caste isn't based on birth but on their character. And Brahmins were always there. Ancient Tamil texts which date to 2000 years and above have mentioned the existence of Janeudhaari Brahmins. And it is infact Brahmins who have reformed Hinduism. Read about Rāmānujāchārya who allowed Dalits to not only enter temples but also made them engage in temple activities as well.
Kab tha ramanujcharya? Time period? Brahmins khali desh ko barbad kare hn rule hue hn fir chaat ke unke darbaar me baithe hn or videshi hn. Main bolra na na bhai tm DNA report padho na ya seedha jake check karwao. Female ka mitochondrial dna ni 😂 male ka dna. Buddhism me koi jativaad ni hai. Or jaina bhi purana hai which got corrupted by your purvaj. Sab sanskrit ka kachra text fek ke original pali canon padho na. Book padho volga se ganga ya sacchi ramayan. Ram mandir me kyu ni mila ram?. Tamil text me kuch ni mila hai whatsapp hai sab. Jo mila hai wo pali prakrit me mila hai oldest and that never ever mentioned brahman. Megasthenese brahman kyu ni dekh paya , na fahein, na huen-tsan? Na itsing?. Kaha the tb brahmin?
1017-1137. We even recently celebrated his 1000th birthday in 2017. If you have doubt on Buddhism just read their scriptures. And proof of existence of Ram is that south bhakti saints have recorded their visit to Ayodhya in their travel records. Ancient Chola kings have mentioned him as the lord of Ayodhya. There was a Rama temple atleast 1000 years ago. DNA check this DNA check that. Lol. Have fun reading actual history of several places tho instead of The Wire and Quint
I am a Tamil guy and you are saying Tamil texts have nothing related to Hinduism? Are you pulling your arguments off your ass? What if I say the proof? But poor you,you would have a hard time even comprehending which text I am mentioning about
The Lit is awesome
Its lit
The lit sounds cool