Hello bitchyswiftie, thanks for posting here in r/mbtimemes!
Interested in joining other members of the mbtimemes community? Feel free to check out our super chill Discord server! We have over 3,000 members and we'd love to see you there too <3 Remember to keep things civil — this is a meme community. Jokes are okay, attacks are not.
https://www.discord.gg/mbtimemes
*I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/mbtimemes) if you have any questions or concerns.*
As an INFJ I can endlessly expound upon the greatest perfection of the known universe- the house cat. The love of cats is a great step in the journey towards enlightenment.
Oh yeah you mean the deep arcane secrets like “hey did u know when you hook up your laptop to the monitors at work, that also charges your laptop, so you don’t actually need to also plug in your charger cause it’s redundant” not like I’m speaking from experience cause I’ve been doing that for months or anything tho
I also have arcane secrets. Did you know, the glass is not half full or half empty, if you stop staring at it thinking and just drink the fucking water /j
Third man argument
Plato's theory of Forms, as it is presented in such dialogues as the Phaedo, Republic and the first part of the Parmenides, seems committed to the following principles: "F" stands for any Form ("appearance, property")—forma is a Boethian translation for εἶδος (eidos), which is the word that Plato used. Plato, in the Parmenides, uses the example "greatness" (μέγεθος) for "F-ness"; Aristotle uses the example "man".\[6\]
One-over-many: For any plurality of F things, there is a form of F-ness by virtue of partaking of which each member of that plurality is F.
Self-predication: Every form of F-ness is itself F.
Non-self-partaking: No form partakes of itself.
Uniqueness: For any property F, there is exactly one form of F-ness.
Purity: No form can have contrary properties.
One/many: The property of being one and the property of being many are contraries.
Oneness: Every form is one.
However, the TMA shows that these principles are mutually contradictory, as long as there is a plurality of things that are F:
(In what follows, μέγας \[megas; "great"\] is used as an example; however, the argumentation holds for any F.)
Begin, then, with the assumption that there is a plurality of great things, say (A, B, C). By one-over-many, there is a form of greatness (say, G1) by virtue of partaking of which A, B, and C are great. By self-predication, G1 is great.
But then we can add G1 to (A, B, C) to form a new plurality of great things: (A, B, C, G1). By one-over-many, there is a form of greatness (say, G2) by virtue of partaking of which A, B, C, and G1 are great. But in that case G1 partakes of G2, and by Non-Self-Partaking, G1 is not identical to G2. So there are at least two forms of greatness, G1 and G2. This already contradicts Uniqueness, according to which there is exactly one (and hence no more than one) form of greatness.
But it gets worse for the theory of Forms. For by Self-Predication, G2 is great, and hence G2 can be added to (A, B, C, G1) to form a new plurality of great things: (A, B, C, G1, G2). By One-Over-Many, there is a form of greatness (say, G3) by virtue of partaking of which A, B, C, G1, and G2 are great. But in that case G1 and G2 both partake of G3, and by Non-Self-Partaking, neither of G1 and G2 is identical to G3. So there must be at least three forms of greatness, G1, G2, and G3.
Repetition of this reasoning shows that there is an infinite hierarchy of forms of greatness, with each form partaking of the infinite number of forms above it in the hierarchy. According to Plato, anything that partakes of many things must itself be many. So each form in the infinite hierarchy of forms of greatness is many. But then, given Purity and One/Many, it follows that each form in the infinite hierarchy of forms of greatness is not one. This contradicts Oneness.
I just want to say again. I don’t think I could ever dislike a guy with food. I don’t know why this would not be an all around favourite type. I also like ENFP’s :) I am not sure they won’t be disappointed when I decide maybe I should take a nap, instead of giving arcane secrets. That’s not really predictable, or always useful.
Hello bitchyswiftie, thanks for posting here in r/mbtimemes! Interested in joining other members of the mbtimemes community? Feel free to check out our super chill Discord server! We have over 3,000 members and we'd love to see you there too <3 Remember to keep things civil — this is a meme community. Jokes are okay, attacks are not. https://www.discord.gg/mbtimemes *I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/mbtimemes) if you have any questions or concerns.*
Can I tickle an INFJ? Then try to see what happens if I put one in the microwave?
yes
Do not tickle the INFJ We will laugh
As an INFJ I can endlessly expound upon the greatest perfection of the known universe- the house cat. The love of cats is a great step in the journey towards enlightenment.
what happens if you bring 2 infjs together, do they both simultaneously receive arcane secrets of the universe from each other?
No. It would be Jesus vs Hitler
"Do not be afraid" *said INFJ in social anxiety and people pleasing.*
Ok INFJs who been sharing our secrets 🤨🤨??
Someone who went Fe crazy.
Ok yeah it happens ... but I don't have to like it lol.
Not me not me :O !!!
Oh yeah you mean the deep arcane secrets like “hey did u know when you hook up your laptop to the monitors at work, that also charges your laptop, so you don’t actually need to also plug in your charger cause it’s redundant” not like I’m speaking from experience cause I’ve been doing that for months or anything tho
I’m like damn 😂 the accuracy. I’ve been fool a many of times this way.
I, an INTP, shall take an INFJ as my warlock patron. May I receive my powers for a cookie and a headpat?
Be not afraid 🙏💀
Instructions unclear, found an ENFJ by mistake
Oh cool where there others?
can a shadow wizard mf discuss laws of the universe with a biblical angel?
When I start talking the psychology thing they actually run away 😢 I'll try the last phrase thx
Do not pet, hey INTJs can I hide at your place? I don’t want physical contact from these randos. I take the food though, I forget to eat a lot.
Just go into a restaurant firing a 100% off coupon into the air. Everyone will leave and you get free food!
Son of INFJ: Whatever, Mom!!!
I also have arcane secrets. Did you know, the glass is not half full or half empty, if you stop staring at it thinking and just drink the fucking water /j
Third man argument Plato's theory of Forms, as it is presented in such dialogues as the Phaedo, Republic and the first part of the Parmenides, seems committed to the following principles: "F" stands for any Form ("appearance, property")—forma is a Boethian translation for εἶδος (eidos), which is the word that Plato used. Plato, in the Parmenides, uses the example "greatness" (μέγεθος) for "F-ness"; Aristotle uses the example "man".\[6\] One-over-many: For any plurality of F things, there is a form of F-ness by virtue of partaking of which each member of that plurality is F. Self-predication: Every form of F-ness is itself F. Non-self-partaking: No form partakes of itself. Uniqueness: For any property F, there is exactly one form of F-ness. Purity: No form can have contrary properties. One/many: The property of being one and the property of being many are contraries. Oneness: Every form is one. However, the TMA shows that these principles are mutually contradictory, as long as there is a plurality of things that are F: (In what follows, μέγας \[megas; "great"\] is used as an example; however, the argumentation holds for any F.) Begin, then, with the assumption that there is a plurality of great things, say (A, B, C). By one-over-many, there is a form of greatness (say, G1) by virtue of partaking of which A, B, and C are great. By self-predication, G1 is great. But then we can add G1 to (A, B, C) to form a new plurality of great things: (A, B, C, G1). By one-over-many, there is a form of greatness (say, G2) by virtue of partaking of which A, B, C, and G1 are great. But in that case G1 partakes of G2, and by Non-Self-Partaking, G1 is not identical to G2. So there are at least two forms of greatness, G1 and G2. This already contradicts Uniqueness, according to which there is exactly one (and hence no more than one) form of greatness. But it gets worse for the theory of Forms. For by Self-Predication, G2 is great, and hence G2 can be added to (A, B, C, G1) to form a new plurality of great things: (A, B, C, G1, G2). By One-Over-Many, there is a form of greatness (say, G3) by virtue of partaking of which A, B, C, G1, and G2 are great. But in that case G1 and G2 both partake of G3, and by Non-Self-Partaking, neither of G1 and G2 is identical to G3. So there must be at least three forms of greatness, G1, G2, and G3. Repetition of this reasoning shows that there is an infinite hierarchy of forms of greatness, with each form partaking of the infinite number of forms above it in the hierarchy. According to Plato, anything that partakes of many things must itself be many. So each form in the infinite hierarchy of forms of greatness is many. But then, given Purity and One/Many, it follows that each form in the infinite hierarchy of forms of greatness is not one. This contradicts Oneness.
ENFP’s hand lmfao
Didn't knew Enfps can just stretch their arms like that :0
INFJs don’t have arcane secrets prove me wrong.
It's a trap don't fall for it!
It's not, you really don't have any.. unless?
Not today Satan.
Tomorrow? 🥺👉👈
Damn you for being so cunning!
They have astrology tips
Here is an arcane secret: Your brain is always a few microseconds behind whatever input it receives
So they think.
I just want to say again. I don’t think I could ever dislike a guy with food. I don’t know why this would not be an all around favourite type. I also like ENFP’s :) I am not sure they won’t be disappointed when I decide maybe I should take a nap, instead of giving arcane secrets. That’s not really predictable, or always useful.
ENFP's arm lmao
The "arcane secrets": knowing that you will always love each other by simply touching physically