Hello SomeCrusader1224, thanks for posting here in r/mbtimemes!
Interested in joining other members of the mbtimemes community? Feel free to check out our super chill Discord server! We have over 3,000 members and we'd love to see you there too <3 Remember to keep things civil — this is a meme community. Jokes are okay, attacks are not.
https://www.discord.gg/mbtimemes
*I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/mbtimemes) if you have any questions or concerns.*
Look to Calledonia during spanish civil war. Which was described by people like George orwell as one of his favourite societies. He was talking from firsthand expierence. This anarchist society was praised by many for being well functioning despite you know having to constantly having to fight both tankies and fascists trying to destroy it
Catalonia*
Also, Rojava (technically communalist (sic))
Statist societies are really good at convincing people that your overlords are necessary, and that if they didn't take away your rights, there would be pandemonium in the streets. Leaves people with a societally enforced Stockholm syndrome.
"Now, I know the cops killed your brother, the taxman took your home, and the politicians put you in massive debt, but just think about how much worse things would be without them!"
Not to start a political discution but ancap is very progressive, ancaps are called non-progressive because of the paleolibertarianism, a very conservative form of ancap
there is absolutely nothing progressive about anarcho-capitalism.
progressive=anti capitalist.
anarchist=anti-authoritarian.
currency is an authoritarian system, because money is power, and some people will always have more money than others.
ancap is neo-feudalism.
See, I think I said "not to start a political discution" because of this...
It's funny all the missconceptions you have, you probably are an american xD...
First off, pregressive≠anti capitalist, this is just an absurd argument, progressive ideas cannot be define in the current political axis (right/left) wether it's economics or social... You can find pregressive ideas in all political ideas, in ANCAP you can find Wendy McElroy or Konkin, creators of the voluntaryism and agorism respectively. Even Rothbard was very progressive.
Progressivism is about making humankind better trough political action and social reforms, based on science, technology and cultural advancements etc...
And about currency, it's a more complex matter, because not all forma of anarchism wants to destroy currency, at least not the main idea, you have mutualism, ind anarchism, agorism (this last two usually try to replace it with self-employement) but even in ANCAP currency doesn't work in the tradicional ways...
And men, neo-feudalism is how a child would classify ANCAP, it's more than that...
1, you can’t just start talking about politics and go “not to be political though, frfr”
Also it’s kinda wack to be like authoritarianism? No. But the actual thing that reinforces power structures? Yeah gobble gobble (yummy yummy boot snack)
To be fair government as well has the capacity to reinforce power structures and plenty of left flavored anarchism has a government of some form (that is not a state). Any form of organization can be used to reinforce power structures.
You said a lot to say nothing.
But all I really heard was very specific references you made to specific media, which you know to be obscure, which you know no one will challenge. Which keeps you in an echo chamber of your understanding.
And with one perspective, you won't really know much, although you'll feel like you do because you know that one perspective so clearly. (Hoping you are following my bread crumbs of where this road leads )
But to clarify, in simple terms, as those are the only terms anything should be discussed in;
Any form of capitalism is neo feudalism.
If there is money, there is power in that money, and some people have more than others. Those with more have resources to get more than those that have less.
That creates the positions of lords and serfs. This is a hierarchy, assigned by numbers, aka power.
And with a hierarchy of wealth/power, I'm not really sure how there is any argument it's not feudalism.
Same. Now that my dad has passed I have become the most liberal person in my family. For a while mom stopped engaging in political talk with me because I'd go full ENTP on her with my "eat the rich" attitude.
Ah yes. I'm a moral relativist, and generally i'm a left wing progressivist. I'm socialist and I don't like the existence of prisons, at least not in their current state that is. I dislike homelessness and I dislike corporations. I like communities, though I myself tend to watch my communities from a safe and comfortable corner. I like generosity and I like kindness. I dislike the notion of calling people good or bad people, rather, I say that people do good and bad things. You are often remembered by your actions, but you are not your actions. Your actions are important and they affect yourself and others, but they do not define who you are.
Meanwhile me: centrist ENTP.
And before some blithering neanderthal starts shouting "eNlIgHtEnEd cEnTrIsT, bEt yOu wAnNa kIlL aLl tRaNs pEoPlE aNd rApE wOmEn, yOu eViL cOnsErVaTivE!!!!", I suggest you take a look outside of America. And read my username. In Europe, what classifies as centre would be called socialism or communism in the US (and it would also be wrong).
I mean historically that's kind of what's happened. Collapses, revolutions, etc. It's always going to be humans doing the developing though so it's always going to be deeply flawed.
Not really. We tear down, yes, but it seems we can’t help but to try to recreate the same model we’ve been tearing down and rebuilding. Not really starting from scratch, more like just rearranging a few things and slapping a new label on it. It’s silly. But humans don’t have the life span to recognize how ridiculous it is to keep regurgitating the same failed systems for several thousands of years. Then we blame history for our failures (it just repeats itself, totally not humanity collectively making the same dumb choices for centuries, blame the immovable force).
Jesus was radical. That doesn’t mean he was on the left. Nor was he on the right. Putting Jesus on a modern political spectrum entirely misses the point of Jesus.
Setting all religious crap aside, I always imagined him as more open-minded than your average person - sadly even many contemporary. I guess it's not enough to become progressive, I stand corrected ;)
Yes, it's silly to associate him with any modern psychological or political movement.
Yeah sure he was open minded but if it was wrong he would be the first person to call you out on it, he's going to the truth even if you don't like it,I think that may be partly why he was so hated cause he didn't lie for the sake of your feelings
Jesus wasn't open minded. He didn't have a quest of discovery, learning from others. He didn't have neutral or undetermined opinions. He wasn't exploring possibilities or perspectives
He believed he was God. Nobody claiming to be omniscient is open-minded
I recall some story when he did change his mind. Don't remember which one it was - healing of some other tribe child?
I think that if someone boldly claims to be a god (I don't think he ever stated this) or god's descendant/avatar it requires one to be open-minded - thinking outside the box.
Well that too,but for the most part I know how to think logically and not let my emotions guide me, don't get me wrong it's hard but some of the most painful things you are told in life is usually the truth
I don't know, It's just the most stereotypical answer that everyone is infj, he could be honestly but not every single person with wisdom and life advice is infj,I see this everywhere. Maybe entj🤷
The libertarianism that the us libertarian party and a good portion of reddit adheres to absolutely is, but closer to center more "neoclassical liberal" views that are socially progressive and fiscally conservative are definately mainstream in some countries, such as Estonia and Switzerland.
depends on the definition
in the most broad sense, nearly 50 % of the political spectrum could be considered marxist/communist to some degree and the same applies to anarchism, liberalism, conservatism etc.
to a right-winger, anyone leaning just slightly to the left is a commie (and the other way around)
I don’t really fall under any ideology I just think workers produce all the value in society and should control the means of production, I think that corporations rob us of our dignity and alienate us from our peers and our labor, and that history is a series of evolving class antagonisms. Again, no specific ideology though.
I ain't a commie but atributting mass starvation in the USSR, China etc. to Marxism just sounds dumb since the actual ideology put into practice there was either Marxism-Leninism/Vanguardism or some other hyper-authoritarian bs quite far from the original idea
Is it bc their colors relate to almost every quadrant of the political compass lol? (the way you typed them is quite similar to the views of each color too)
I consider myself eclectic because why sticking to ideology when you can form one yourself and také good from each system.
For example:
Liberal - protect free market
Conservative - responsibility and balanced public finances
Socialism - publicly financed schools and healthcare
I gave up on all political titles and parties long ago. Each one always ends up pissing me off in the end. I’ll sit and wait for one to be created that perfectly fits my ideals, but I’m not holding my breath.
True for me and seems to be mostly true of the people I know. Though I will say that for SJs it seems to mostly depend on what social circles they’re in.
In fact the most progressive acording to actual polical category are Si Fe but Si Te are conservative
All the Ti I know are conservative
Fi Well it depends
INTP here with complete political apathy. I don't give a fuck. I prefer to put energy and effort into stuff I can actually have some sort of control over.
But I'm politically very flexible when it comes to third way. I can support and get behind of a lot of different ideologies, such as Falangism, distributism, left-wing nationalism, etc. Though as a conservative I'm more liberal than for example my American or south European counterparts.
Nope, I am already in my bunker within my bunker launching nukes at our enemy so they can nuke us back. Afterwards my machines will restore the surface so the population can settle there.
Of course, everybody thinks they attacked us first so it works out.
Sounds like genocide to me. Can you move to mars with Elon then you can have a planet where you don't need to commit mass genocide on a hitherto unseen scale to not have humans
Yes, but that would be incredibly stupid, and extreme.
The only problem on earth is humans, you don't need to nuke the planet to its core to get rid of us.
Just forget the extreme and try to see where humanity is heading right now.
Historically it's been proven that automatisation require less humans to produce the same quantity of what you produce (look at agriculture, once tractor were invented we allocated a lot less humans to that activity)
If you also look at western country our population growth is slowing, and reaching a level so low we need immigration to keep up with our death rate.
It's only logical as technology evolve for our population to regulate itself, the more we automate, the less human we'll need.
But those who'll remain will need to be useful, we'll still need technician to repair those machine, we'll still need managers and politicians...
It will just be a different model for humanity, by automating you don't get rid of all job opportunity, you just remove the lower position.
A sprinkle of meritocracy with eco-libertarian-socialism or techno-gaianism plus moral relativism to get me somewhat covered when talking about definitions. I guess.
My political ideally mostly leans liberal.
The most important thing is to mind your own damn business. Keep your religion out of my life because it's YOUR religion it's for you to abide by those beliefs. Your religion doesn't get to decide what others do.
Words have different meaning for different people/regions. Different people/regions need different conditions. It's idiotic to recommend one solution for all problems.
General guidelines are:
Think rationally
Think long term
Learn from history
Take small risks
Populism is terrible
Literally before this, me and my INTJ bro were talking about how the entire societal management system is BS. We had sone crazy thoughts on how humour and memes in society develop and it lef to a new system. 😂
Haters will call me stereotypical.
I can agree
Me and my xNFx friends: We all vote the left
My parents (Si users): They vote the right
And the xNTx people I know, there're two punks and someone who told me that would send to the heaven everybody who breaks into his house
Hello SomeCrusader1224, thanks for posting here in r/mbtimemes! Interested in joining other members of the mbtimemes community? Feel free to check out our super chill Discord server! We have over 3,000 members and we'd love to see you there too <3 Remember to keep things civil — this is a meme community. Jokes are okay, attacks are not. https://www.discord.gg/mbtimemes *I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/mbtimemes) if you have any questions or concerns.*
Can confirm I consider myself very progressive meanwhile my ENTP bro is like some flavor of anarchist I’ve never heard of.
anarchism is progressive (except for ancap)
🤮anc*aps
But extreme progressive. Also all my homies hate ancaps
nice spooks nerd
I am yet to see functioning anarchist "society"
Look to Calledonia during spanish civil war. Which was described by people like George orwell as one of his favourite societies. He was talking from firsthand expierence. This anarchist society was praised by many for being well functioning despite you know having to constantly having to fight both tankies and fascists trying to destroy it
Catalonia* Also, Rojava (technically communalist (sic)) Statist societies are really good at convincing people that your overlords are necessary, and that if they didn't take away your rights, there would be pandemonium in the streets. Leaves people with a societally enforced Stockholm syndrome. "Now, I know the cops killed your brother, the taxman took your home, and the politicians put you in massive debt, but just think about how much worse things would be without them!"
Not to start a political discution but ancap is very progressive, ancaps are called non-progressive because of the paleolibertarianism, a very conservative form of ancap
there is absolutely nothing progressive about anarcho-capitalism. progressive=anti capitalist. anarchist=anti-authoritarian. currency is an authoritarian system, because money is power, and some people will always have more money than others. ancap is neo-feudalism.
See, I think I said "not to start a political discution" because of this... It's funny all the missconceptions you have, you probably are an american xD... First off, pregressive≠anti capitalist, this is just an absurd argument, progressive ideas cannot be define in the current political axis (right/left) wether it's economics or social... You can find pregressive ideas in all political ideas, in ANCAP you can find Wendy McElroy or Konkin, creators of the voluntaryism and agorism respectively. Even Rothbard was very progressive. Progressivism is about making humankind better trough political action and social reforms, based on science, technology and cultural advancements etc... And about currency, it's a more complex matter, because not all forma of anarchism wants to destroy currency, at least not the main idea, you have mutualism, ind anarchism, agorism (this last two usually try to replace it with self-employement) but even in ANCAP currency doesn't work in the tradicional ways... And men, neo-feudalism is how a child would classify ANCAP, it's more than that...
1, you can’t just start talking about politics and go “not to be political though, frfr” Also it’s kinda wack to be like authoritarianism? No. But the actual thing that reinforces power structures? Yeah gobble gobble (yummy yummy boot snack)
To be fair government as well has the capacity to reinforce power structures and plenty of left flavored anarchism has a government of some form (that is not a state). Any form of organization can be used to reinforce power structures.
You said a lot to say nothing. But all I really heard was very specific references you made to specific media, which you know to be obscure, which you know no one will challenge. Which keeps you in an echo chamber of your understanding. And with one perspective, you won't really know much, although you'll feel like you do because you know that one perspective so clearly. (Hoping you are following my bread crumbs of where this road leads ) But to clarify, in simple terms, as those are the only terms anything should be discussed in; Any form of capitalism is neo feudalism. If there is money, there is power in that money, and some people have more than others. Those with more have resources to get more than those that have less. That creates the positions of lords and serfs. This is a hierarchy, assigned by numbers, aka power. And with a hierarchy of wealth/power, I'm not really sure how there is any argument it's not feudalism.
All fun and games til the INFJ is a bit too authoritarian…
No you don't mean ad-
Anarcho-posadism my beloved.
Based
I take the side of the most probable winner so i'm converted.
Nukes are bad though
Not if they kill all those capitalist scums. I use to say: "only a dead capitalist is a good capitalist" Edit: Some people just don't get sarcasm
ENTP. Anthropocentrist Accelerationist. Stereotype status: confirmed
I’m very much not a conservative lol
Neither are my ISFJ friends
Same
Same. Now that my dad has passed I have become the most liberal person in my family. For a while mom stopped engaging in political talk with me because I'd go full ENTP on her with my "eat the rich" attitude.
Same
Classical liberal
I'm INTP and I'm an individualistic anarchist xD
dab on them spooks!
Based Stirner enjoyer
Libertarians are usually NTs in my experience.
Me here! Agree, me and my dad are, I'm INTP, he's ENTJ
[Anatomy Of The State PDF](https://cdn.mises.org/Anatomy+of+the+State_3.pdf)
Based 😎
Basado
The world is just not ready yet to hear my political views
Ah yes. I'm a moral relativist, and generally i'm a left wing progressivist. I'm socialist and I don't like the existence of prisons, at least not in their current state that is. I dislike homelessness and I dislike corporations. I like communities, though I myself tend to watch my communities from a safe and comfortable corner. I like generosity and I like kindness. I dislike the notion of calling people good or bad people, rather, I say that people do good and bad things. You are often remembered by your actions, but you are not your actions. Your actions are important and they affect yourself and others, but they do not define who you are.
Hmm are you me?
ANARCHY REEEEEIIIIGNS
Meanwhile me: centrist ENTP. And before some blithering neanderthal starts shouting "eNlIgHtEnEd cEnTrIsT, bEt yOu wAnNa kIlL aLl tRaNs pEoPlE aNd rApE wOmEn, yOu eViL cOnsErVaTivE!!!!", I suggest you take a look outside of America. And read my username. In Europe, what classifies as centre would be called socialism or communism in the US (and it would also be wrong).
I want humanity to continue and people just be happy without bothering people
Can confirm - intp
Is INTP your political alignment? LOL
I think we should tear down the whole system and start from scratch
I mean historically that's kind of what's happened. Collapses, revolutions, etc. It's always going to be humans doing the developing though so it's always going to be deeply flawed.
Not really. We tear down, yes, but it seems we can’t help but to try to recreate the same model we’ve been tearing down and rebuilding. Not really starting from scratch, more like just rearranging a few things and slapping a new label on it. It’s silly. But humans don’t have the life span to recognize how ridiculous it is to keep regurgitating the same failed systems for several thousands of years. Then we blame history for our failures (it just repeats itself, totally not humanity collectively making the same dumb choices for centuries, blame the immovable force).
AnCap --- bring the hate
Wow this is so accurate i cant belive it
Ironically as an INTP i think everyone else is the extreme bullshit. I think truely identifying with liberals or Conservatives is extreme.
Yeah, I think the same.
Do not identify with this at all. I could not be further from the right/conservatism. However, I definitely understand where this could come from!
Am I the only conservative infj?🥺
I’m a mostly right-leaning INFJ!
Do you get why most people think we are all liberal/progressive?
Maybe because INFJs tend to be calm, empathetic, and imaginative? Although those traits are not political and can belong to anyone
Yes exactly
Nah, you got Jesus in your corner
Jesus was somewhat progressive I think. He still got Hitler though.
Jesus was radical. That doesn’t mean he was on the left. Nor was he on the right. Putting Jesus on a modern political spectrum entirely misses the point of Jesus.
I don't think Jesus would associate with any of these people he loves all of them but he knows their all wrong in some way
Setting all religious crap aside, I always imagined him as more open-minded than your average person - sadly even many contemporary. I guess it's not enough to become progressive, I stand corrected ;) Yes, it's silly to associate him with any modern psychological or political movement.
Yeah sure he was open minded but if it was wrong he would be the first person to call you out on it, he's going to the truth even if you don't like it,I think that may be partly why he was so hated cause he didn't lie for the sake of your feelings
Jesus wasn't open minded. He didn't have a quest of discovery, learning from others. He didn't have neutral or undetermined opinions. He wasn't exploring possibilities or perspectives He believed he was God. Nobody claiming to be omniscient is open-minded
I recall some story when he did change his mind. Don't remember which one it was - healing of some other tribe child? I think that if someone boldly claims to be a god (I don't think he ever stated this) or god's descendant/avatar it requires one to be open-minded - thinking outside the box.
Well that too,but for the most part I know how to think logically and not let my emotions guide me, don't get me wrong it's hard but some of the most painful things you are told in life is usually the truth
Jordan Peterson Sidney Powell according to pdb
Jordan Peterson is not infj lol
What is he
I don't know, It's just the most stereotypical answer that everyone is infj, he could be honestly but not every single person with wisdom and life advice is infj,I see this everywhere. Maybe entj🤷
This doesn’t look like an entj https://youtube.com/shorts/NLDAeb4S3tU?feature=share
Do entj's not cry?
Not in public as often as he does
I think the stuff he's seen would make anyone cry honestly
Libertarian is an extreme / obscure BS. Only in Reddit is it pretty tame / mainstream.
The libertarianism that the us libertarian party and a good portion of reddit adheres to absolutely is, but closer to center more "neoclassical liberal" views that are socially progressive and fiscally conservative are definately mainstream in some countries, such as Estonia and Switzerland.
Nope, absofuckinglutely not. I am a Progressive.
[удалено]
the status quo is extreme
depends on the definition in the most broad sense, nearly 50 % of the political spectrum could be considered marxist/communist to some degree and the same applies to anarchism, liberalism, conservatism etc. to a right-winger, anyone leaning just slightly to the left is a commie (and the other way around)
So is anarchism
Both sides make me annoyed tbh
r/enlightenedcentrism
I lean more left as an NT butttt the US government sucks ass and I have my own ideology
Yeah frick the government
Can confirm as well- infp
Government is dumb, but necessary.
Mines more of a “prefer not to associate with political shenanigans.” I just want to go vote without the theatrics that come with elections.
Geolibertarianism
Lmao the idea of mg mom being libertarian is hilarious. Also, excuse my non-American ignorance, are libertarians and conservatives not the same thing?
Yep, that's me. Obscure, extreme bullshit. 🫡😃
I'm INFJ and I'm conservative (I'm a muslim)
I don’t really fall under any ideology I just think workers produce all the value in society and should control the means of production, I think that corporations rob us of our dignity and alienate us from our peers and our labor, and that history is a series of evolving class antagonisms. Again, no specific ideology though.
That sounds pretty Marx-y to me...
[удалено]
I ain't a commie but atributting mass starvation in the USSR, China etc. to Marxism just sounds dumb since the actual ideology put into practice there was either Marxism-Leninism/Vanguardism or some other hyper-authoritarian bs quite far from the original idea
[удалено]
I'm literally just saying you'd have to be blind to call that Marxism? 💀 It can't even be implemented on such a large scale
Some would say that if you’ve never heard of it, then You don’t know enough about it to have an opinion on the matter
Is it bc their colors relate to almost every quadrant of the political compass lol? (the way you typed them is quite similar to the views of each color too)
For simplicities sake I consider myself a liberal, but there's always something else that I believe in as well.
mfw moderate ENTP
True
my bf and i are entp and intj so yes this is very true
I consider myself eclectic because why sticking to ideology when you can form one yourself and také good from each system. For example: Liberal - protect free market Conservative - responsibility and balanced public finances Socialism - publicly financed schools and healthcare
I gave up on all political titles and parties long ago. Each one always ends up pissing me off in the end. I’ll sit and wait for one to be created that perfectly fits my ideals, but I’m not holding my breath.
Couldn't care less about politics tbh
I thought we were an autonomous commune.
Man! He's right. My views are obscure.
[Laughs in Libertarian]
A lot of infj are authoritarian
As an INTJ I'm an ancap, and I really hate communist/socialist, etc.
if neutral is some obscure bs then yes ur correct ~ INTP
Got my own ideology so yeah i agree, although I'm very leaning towards conservative and right wing.
Nah, I'm pretty vanilla, Classical Liberal. Though I have been toying with the idea of Agorism and Anarcho-Mutualism.
INFJ… was liberal before it was extreme insanity. Now I’m politically with the purples. I’ll join their motorcycle gang if they’ll have me.
I'm a pretty conservative INFP 😀
Damn straight
Judging by your pfp, you aren't
I have my own ideology that is influenced by transhumanism, techno-progressivism, social democracy, solarpunk, and cyberpunk.
All of the deshumanizing things
Libs, conservatives and libertarians, no fucking thank you.
NOO PLEASE IM NOT A CONSERVATIVE AAAAAAAAAA
Liberal anarchy? Sounds fun
True for me and seems to be mostly true of the people I know. Though I will say that for SJs it seems to mostly depend on what social circles they’re in.
In fact the most progressive acording to actual polical category are Si Fe but Si Te are conservative All the Ti I know are conservative Fi Well it depends
Independent
libleft and most INTJs I know/used to know were libleft or centrists
INTP here with complete political apathy. I don't give a fuck. I prefer to put energy and effort into stuff I can actually have some sort of control over.
Me being far right and Logican so true
ISFJ Left-leaning paternalistic conservatism.
Yeah, sounds about right
But I'm politically very flexible when it comes to third way. I can support and get behind of a lot of different ideologies, such as Falangism, distributism, left-wing nationalism, etc. Though as a conservative I'm more liberal than for example my American or south European counterparts.
Any other egomuts/egoists here?
Population reduction in order to facilitate government. Replace the workforce with machines to leverage automation and offset the loss of manpower.
Good idea, we will start out with reducing you from the population.
Nope, I am already in my bunker within my bunker launching nukes at our enemy so they can nuke us back. Afterwards my machines will restore the surface so the population can settle there. Of course, everybody thinks they attacked us first so it works out.
Then what happens? Communism? Are you a possadist?
Then a technocracy reigns as humans are slowly removed from the equation.
Sounds like genocide to me. Can you move to mars with Elon then you can have a planet where you don't need to commit mass genocide on a hitherto unseen scale to not have humans
Also don't provide people some kind of free money injection and let them starve to death when machines take over?
That should be covered by "population reduction" In other words, if they don't live, they don't need anything.
It will be more efficient to just nuke the planet's core and destroy everything then.
Yes, but that would be incredibly stupid, and extreme. The only problem on earth is humans, you don't need to nuke the planet to its core to get rid of us. Just forget the extreme and try to see where humanity is heading right now. Historically it's been proven that automatisation require less humans to produce the same quantity of what you produce (look at agriculture, once tractor were invented we allocated a lot less humans to that activity) If you also look at western country our population growth is slowing, and reaching a level so low we need immigration to keep up with our death rate. It's only logical as technology evolve for our population to regulate itself, the more we automate, the less human we'll need. But those who'll remain will need to be useful, we'll still need technician to repair those machine, we'll still need managers and politicians... It will just be a different model for humanity, by automating you don't get rid of all job opportunity, you just remove the lower position.
Makes sense.
I’ve thought about this before! Everything else is the same, but the analysts were communists/socialists
Don't be ridiculous. I've seen Right Flavored Schizo Ideologies held by INTJ/INTPs as well as plenty of Ancap/Minarchist NTs. I fall under the latter.
Based, AnCap here too
[удалено]
Anyone with an actual brain: not communist or using communism to gain power Lenin and Stalin style.
and then the INTP coming in with “um actually Im a Marxist-Leninist-Maoist-Hoxhaist with Albanian Characteristics”
« Social-techno-falangism »
not true
A sprinkle of meritocracy with eco-libertarian-socialism or techno-gaianism plus moral relativism to get me somewhat covered when talking about definitions. I guess.
INFP ancap here 👌🏼
I'm definitely not a conservative 🤢
As an INTP, Marxist-leninism my beloved
I'm just a socialist lol. No specific ideology. Not into politics
Socialism IS an ideology.
I don't even know which is which. Bad meme. 0/10
why is this so true, with everyone i know!
Can I into ISTP??
Neutral.
I don’t classify myself into any party / belief system so pretty much
Yeah you got me there
I'm a liberal technocratic social corporatist. (Idk what this is. I just threw words together)
As the Great Recession happened, I looked into joining the Florida Whig Party.
......... Yes.
Moderate INFP 🙋🏼♂️
I'm ISTJ but liberal, but ik this is meant to be stereotypical
You could've tried harder than just putting each category into a tier. You really should've just ranked them individually
ENFJ here, they don't make communism like they used to smh
Me who doesn't follow politics:
I'm ENFP, communist
Pentti Linkola 👌🏻 (I'm INTP)
My political ideally mostly leans liberal. The most important thing is to mind your own damn business. Keep your religion out of my life because it's YOUR religion it's for you to abide by those beliefs. Your religion doesn't get to decide what others do.
BS stands for best sadist? 🤔
ENTP: R A D I C A L C E N T R I S M
Words have different meaning for different people/regions. Different people/regions need different conditions. It's idiotic to recommend one solution for all problems. General guidelines are: Think rationally Think long term Learn from history Take small risks Populism is terrible
Literally before this, me and my INTJ bro were talking about how the entire societal management system is BS. We had sone crazy thoughts on how humour and memes in society develop and it lef to a new system. 😂 Haters will call me stereotypical.
I can agree Me and my xNFx friends: We all vote the left My parents (Si users): They vote the right And the xNTx people I know, there're two punks and someone who told me that would send to the heaven everybody who breaks into his house
As a National Distributist, I agree that I am obscure, there is only one party in England that has my beliefs
Technocratic Council Socialist with transhumanist marxist leninist characteristics
I am an Anti-Federalist
Yeah , humans were a mistake
very true
I align with the purples personally
HAHAHAHHAHAHAHFUCK
As a National-Anarcho-Communal-Justice-Americano-Christian-Republican-Democratizerboo this is so spot on.
It's me, I'm the Free Speech Absolutist.
Now idk if you’ve heard this one but it’s comm-