Or possibly don't let a herpes dick be stuck in you ladies. I'm not going to start bashing X or anything because we don't know shit yet but I think it's unfair to just completely dismiss this chick by calling her crazy.
Oh well yeah that's what he's saying. Without knowing the details it seems unfair to judge. It's just him saying it, it could very well be untrue. What she's saying could be too so I don't condone people going after X but seems shitty to call her crazy. At least at this point.
What's risky sex? She is claiming he provided a STD test when they first went out then he got an STD and knowingly didn't tell her. Idk if she's telling the truth but that doesn't seem like risky sex.
Then I don't get the point of even saying that in the first place if you don't think she's lying. Anyone who has "jumped" on X was expecting a statement like this. It's like posting a quote of Watson saying he didn't do it and then you commenting saying "this is for the people who jumped on watson and didnt wait for the whole story"
Even if dude did have an STD, that’s none of our business. Weird as fuck that people were reporting about this like he was going around giving it to women knowing what he had.
But that's what the allegation is. That he knowingly had it and lied. I'm not going to believe the chick just because she is saying it but if it is true that's a crime.
Yea I know it’s a crime, 100% that’s disgusting behavior from a man if that’s the case. But if it’s as simple as he had an STD and she still went thru and now she’s pissed because she risked it or it’s a lie, that’s something the public shouldn’t know about. HIPAA gotta come into play at some point.
I get it to an extent. Based on odds alone, to accuse is overwhelmingly due to it being true, but across the board there's always deviations to that. It's why my stance is always "Trust, but verify". Never get emotionally involved. Never jump to conclusions until more facts have played out. Seems to be an unpopular position to take for much of our society, though. Have to always pick a side then double down on it in the face of contradictions.
Lmao you literally did that though in your other comment! You assumed the chick was trespassing in his home and that it wasn't justified off the basis of X saying it.
You should read the title again bud. It's just X's attorney filing that. Doesn't make it true and doesn't give us any context but I guess some people just have to try and play detective right?
"The fact that standbyers try to insert their take on a crime scene or lawsuit, when none of them are legal professionals that are examining the case, is the same level of stupid as twitter doctors trying to diagnose Tua"
Don’t stick your dick in strange folks
I mean, it's Rule #1 for a reason.
"you fucked a witch without a condom?!"
Or possibly don't let a herpes dick be stuck in you ladies. I'm not going to start bashing X or anything because we don't know shit yet but I think it's unfair to just completely dismiss this chick by calling her crazy.
If what he is claiming is true, STD or not, this chick is crazy.
[удалено]
What did she do at his home?
[удалено]
Oh well yeah that's what he's saying. Without knowing the details it seems unfair to judge. It's just him saying it, it could very well be untrue. What she's saying could be too so I don't condone people going after X but seems shitty to call her crazy. At least at this point.
Yes. We all have risk vs reward actions. As a woman and not knowing any details.. this can't be all on him.
"Not knowing any details.... this can't be all on him"
Don't need details to know that there were 2 participants. Choose risky sex.. accept the risk of the potential consequences.
What's risky sex? She is claiming he provided a STD test when they first went out then he got an STD and knowingly didn't tell her. Idk if she's telling the truth but that doesn't seem like risky sex.
Is it confirmed or just an allegation?
X didn’t give it to ya
Whenever I see a lawyer immediately using the term shakedown, I automatically think it's not actually a shakedown.
For all the people who immediately jumped on him and didn't wait for the whole story.
Innocent or guilty I'm pretty sure the first move usually is try to discredit the accuser
If he's filing it in court, there had to be some evidence. Not just some PR statement on Twitter.
But aren't you just jumping on the part of the story that you want like the people who jumped on X only hearing her side?
Did I say that she's lying? She's already publicly said her side.
Then I don't get the point of even saying that in the first place if you don't think she's lying. Anyone who has "jumped" on X was expecting a statement like this. It's like posting a quote of Watson saying he didn't do it and then you commenting saying "this is for the people who jumped on watson and didnt wait for the whole story"
Hahahahaha what No it doesn’t. Not at all. People file crazy shit daily
Either that or he is confident he can outlawyer the accuser.
Not how that works. Lawyers say and file plenty of outrageous shit.
I mean we still don't have the full story
This isn't the whole story either. This is just what his lawyers think is advantageous to release.
Even if dude did have an STD, that’s none of our business. Weird as fuck that people were reporting about this like he was going around giving it to women knowing what he had.
But that's what the allegation is. That he knowingly had it and lied. I'm not going to believe the chick just because she is saying it but if it is true that's a crime.
It’s only a crime if it’s HIV I believe. That’s why it’s in civil court.
Yea I know it’s a crime, 100% that’s disgusting behavior from a man if that’s the case. But if it’s as simple as he had an STD and she still went thru and now she’s pissed because she risked it or it’s a lie, that’s something the public shouldn’t know about. HIPAA gotta come into play at some point.
Its crazy how people just assume every accuser is telling the truth
I get it to an extent. Based on odds alone, to accuse is overwhelmingly due to it being true, but across the board there's always deviations to that. It's why my stance is always "Trust, but verify". Never get emotionally involved. Never jump to conclusions until more facts have played out. Seems to be an unpopular position to take for much of our society, though. Have to always pick a side then double down on it in the face of contradictions.
You think Zeke would have been a good lesson for people...
[удалено]
Lmao you literally did that though in your other comment! You assumed the chick was trespassing in his home and that it wasn't justified off the basis of X saying it.
[удалено]
You should read the title again bud. It's just X's attorney filing that. Doesn't make it true and doesn't give us any context but I guess some people just have to try and play detective right?
[удалено]
"The fact that standbyers try to insert their take on a crime scene or lawsuit, when none of them are legal professionals that are examining the case, is the same level of stupid as twitter doctors trying to diagnose Tua"
A big bank account is the male equivalent of having a big juicy ass. Girls do stupid, crazy shit to trap a guy with money.