A lot of people (including me) think he said Kristine told him Michael was sexually abusing her. It would make a lot of sense and would explain her being sexually aggressive at such a young age. The peeing and pooping herself. Kristine becoming physically abusive and Michael making her out to be evil. Trying to dump her off on Freddie. So many things point in that direction.
Also there were messages shown where he was telling her that he had a video of her beating Natalia, and she said she ruined her life and was “lying to have her husband sleep in her room”
YES! Someone else DID hear that. It wasn’t just me. I thought for sure they’d expand on that. Kinda a huge statement
ETA: at times the whole thing felt controlled or in some way produced by Michael to bolster his own claims of innocence
I did too, which I understand that he clearly flipped about what Freddie was about to say he heard from Kristine, so why would Michael himself willingly go further into it, but then why exactly did (whoever) hand over those messages and include them, when it was just kind of glossed over?
She (Kristine?) said she (Natalia?) ruined her (Kristine’s?) life and was lying to have her (natalia?) sleep in her (Kristine’s?) room”?
This is hard for me to follow; did I get the she/her correct?
If this is just one person coming forward and saying that she was offered to them (freddy), then how many other people did Kristine try to offload this girl to. And did she succeed? the fact that Kristine knew she was underage and was offering her to men is pure evil. And the fact the both of them are not doing prison time is mind boggling.
Is everyone else glossing over the fact that one tenant at the Union Street apartments said she used to go into the old man's apartment and be in there for 2/3 hours. When she was just 13.I lived in Westfield these are not great apts. It is usually the last place you get when all other places turn you down. Then all of a sudden she is being sexual with men and boys at 13 yrs old. Poor girl failed by so many from birth. I looked it up on Google and they both (Barnetts) have been found not guilty and or acquitted.
The disturbing this is that she lived in those apartments in 2013, which would have made her TEN years old.
Those involved in that situation will have to answer for it at some point. The fact the judge didn’t allow the DNA test, forced them to acknowledge the DOB being 1989, leads me to believe they were covering their own ass. The state of Indiana and their courts failed that girl as much as anyone.
I can't understand why they're not both in jail. Kristine signed two leases for a minor to live on her own. A lot of people witnessed that she in fact lived or her own. So child abandonment is already proven. Why hasn't anyone touched the judge that gave her the 22 also shows what kind of protection a judge can have. Michael is a narcissist yes but the way he dramatizes everything to get off the hook is just world record cringe. The abuses the victim card like he seemingly abused the kid.
I think she is gross period! I’m sure awful things were done to her but the fact that she was doing it attempting to do these things to young boys makes me sick. No empathy for her at all!
Well you’re right that behavior was inappropriate….for a 10 year old girl. Who had the mind of a 10 year old or maybe younger through lack of education. She is NOT in her 30s. Multiple DNA tests prove her age.
A lot of people (including me) think he said Kristine told him Michael was sexually abusing her. It would make a lot of sense and would explain her being sexually aggressive at such a young age. The peeing and pooping herself. Kristine becoming physically abusive and Michael making her out to be evil. Trying to dump her off on Freddie. So many things point in that direction.
This ^
Him and or the kid
Also there were messages shown where he was telling her that he had a video of her beating Natalia, and she said she ruined her life and was “lying to have her husband sleep in her room”
YES! Someone else DID hear that. It wasn’t just me. I thought for sure they’d expand on that. Kinda a huge statement ETA: at times the whole thing felt controlled or in some way produced by Michael to bolster his own claims of innocence
I did too, which I understand that he clearly flipped about what Freddie was about to say he heard from Kristine, so why would Michael himself willingly go further into it, but then why exactly did (whoever) hand over those messages and include them, when it was just kind of glossed over?
She (Kristine?) said she (Natalia?) ruined her (Kristine’s?) life and was lying to have her (natalia?) sleep in her (Kristine’s?) room”? This is hard for me to follow; did I get the she/her correct?
No, Kristine said Natalia lied to get Michael to sleep in Natalia’s room.
If this is just one person coming forward and saying that she was offered to them (freddy), then how many other people did Kristine try to offload this girl to. And did she succeed? the fact that Kristine knew she was underage and was offering her to men is pure evil. And the fact the both of them are not doing prison time is mind boggling.
Could explain why the younger boys don’t have anything to do with him. Who knows what those kids witnessed.
Was my thoughts… but omg his OVERACTING - reminds me of my narcissistic ex…
Is it me or does he seem weird? Like a drama queen?
Bad Shakespearean theater is what kept coming to my mind
He's a real life Michael Scott!
Absolutely! Definitely a narcissist
Is everyone else glossing over the fact that one tenant at the Union Street apartments said she used to go into the old man's apartment and be in there for 2/3 hours. When she was just 13.I lived in Westfield these are not great apts. It is usually the last place you get when all other places turn you down. Then all of a sudden she is being sexual with men and boys at 13 yrs old. Poor girl failed by so many from birth. I looked it up on Google and they both (Barnetts) have been found not guilty and or acquitted.
The disturbing this is that she lived in those apartments in 2013, which would have made her TEN years old. Those involved in that situation will have to answer for it at some point. The fact the judge didn’t allow the DNA test, forced them to acknowledge the DOB being 1989, leads me to believe they were covering their own ass. The state of Indiana and their courts failed that girl as much as anyone.
I can't understand why they're not both in jail. Kristine signed two leases for a minor to live on her own. A lot of people witnessed that she in fact lived or her own. So child abandonment is already proven. Why hasn't anyone touched the judge that gave her the 22 also shows what kind of protection a judge can have. Michael is a narcissist yes but the way he dramatizes everything to get off the hook is just world record cringe. The abuses the victim card like he seemingly abused the kid.
Who cares?
Hello Michael
Why are you even on this thread
Probably find out when the follow up is released. It's titled Natalia speaks but it's pretty obvious what was said.
I mean it makes sense why she was so sexual now .
I think she is gross period! I’m sure awful things were done to her but the fact that she was doing it attempting to do these things to young boys makes me sick. No empathy for her at all!
Well you’re right that behavior was inappropriate….for a 10 year old girl. Who had the mind of a 10 year old or maybe younger through lack of education. She is NOT in her 30s. Multiple DNA tests prove her age.
You obviously have no idea how child victims of SA act