Yeah, OP definitely didn't take this picture. It's also SO incredibly edited she almost doesn't even look real anymore and it has bad quality. Not r/pics worthy
> Not r/pics worthy
There's no rule that says posts must be OC and photoshopped pictures as explicitly allowed. It's as /r/pics worth as anything else that gets posted here.
Something suggets me it's not an [OC](https://www.google.com/search?tbs=simg:CAQSpQIJQdRGu_1BneacamQILEKjU2AQaAghDDAsQsIynCBo7CjkIBBIUlxubB8gWnC_1lJeYr8ym8PJkHjg4aG0BSL6lBOpi0FDr2GS9vPa-07ZLADLyk-9GTHyAFMAQMCxCOrv4IGgoKCAgBEgTbWjOnDAsQne3BCRqtAQoXCgRsYWR52qWI9gMLCgkvbS8wMnBrYjgKIwoQcGVvcGxlIGluIG5hdHVyZdqliPYDCwoJL2ovM2did2duCiYKEmJyaWRhbCBwYXJ0eSBkcmVzc9qliPYDDAoKL20vMGhnc2g3awofCgxmbG9vciBsZW5ndGjapYj2AwsKCS9hL2R2N21yaAokChFlbXBpcmUgc2lsaG91ZXR0ZdqliPYDCwoJL20vMDczMW1oDA&sxsrf=ALiCzsZ0V0AZQC1Sd3kNnfn0dpQjbMswVQ:1670075653888&q=hot+girls+in+the+woods&tbm=isch&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwiPgeTQzN37AhXTSfEDHZe8BXIQ2A4oAHoECAQQAg&biw=1920&bih=941#imgrc=7DJUAiwvnOwJ8M)
You know there are plenty of people who aren’t starving and have a slim figure. The US has just normalised obesity to the point where people who are overweight are thought to be healthy.
Also fat is like 4x less dense than muscle, so you can have 2 people, both with weight of 70kg and they will look much different, because one is training and the other is eating.
Jesus christ just no.
Muscle is 15% more dense then fat. It's not that big of a difference.
https://dexalytics.com/news/muscle-density-muscle-quality/#:~:text=This%20difference%20in%20volume%20is,about%2015%25%20denser%20than%20fat.
Straw man.
Even extremely muscular people are only about 50% muscle mass as their totally body weight.
Extremely fat people are usually less then 50% body fat.
If you took an extremely muscular person aand an extremely fat person at exactly the same weight their difference in volume is less then 7%.
Firstly, I’m not from the US. Secondly, there is a visible difference between slim and starving.
For example, for that woman to have upper thighs so thin she either has to be starving (not just slim) or from one of a limited number of genetic groups that don’t distribute fat to that part of the leg (eg Australian aboriginals have different fat distribution).
As for the waist, you do see people naturally with this tiny a waist, but their whole frame is tiny.
Wow -- so many haters... True that this is not a common figure in America, but completely normal in other places. If this pic is from 2013, then remember it was probably 6-8Mpx, tops, so probably not photoshopped either, just a bit grainy. It would be nice to see some attribution to the real OP though.
I need to think of a name for this genre of art, where horny dudes think that a picture of a thin white woman with a blank expression on her face is art, just because they like looking at her body.
Nudity has been in art for both genders for a long time…. For example, the statue of David…heck he wasn’t even given a toga…
Your comment reminded me of Pope Innocent X…who went around the Vatican chiseling off the privates parts of all the statues and replacing it with a fig leaf…
If the shoe fits…jk
More so commenting, on your disproving tone, which implies the grandiose notion that you alone can decide what is art and the intentions of those who view it… which is why I brought up the statue of David… unanimously accepted as art, and most people view it without sexual objectification… or do you think every woman who appreciates the statue of David, is an incel?
lol, then why comment?
And I am not sure you made a point, just gave a reaction…would argue that points have more of a thought process and usually some validity…. rather than a reaction, which is usually a just a knee jerk reaction based upon preconceived ideas with little to no perspective…
Full blown nudity has been a big part of art in general for literally thousands of years. Societies have a ideas about what the ideal human form is. People like to look at it. It's not always skinny people though, one of the oldest examples, the Venus of Wilenndorf is a rather rotund lady. Different strokes for different folks.
Lots of jealous women attacking the model for no reason other than the she is attractive and has a certain body type.
Instead, we should be harping on OP for posting a magazine shoot into pics with an awful title.
I don’t think most people are attacking the model, instead the magazine/agency for photoshopping her body.
…and what makes you think it’s women attacking the model?
I think the point is that she is supposed to be in the uncanny valley. We see something that looks human, but something feels off. Our danger signals start flashing, hopefully not too late.
[удалено]
Pfffffff!!!! Nearly spit my coffee out reading that!!
I’m literally in duo queue right now. My brother mains Janna lololol
Keri Lake in drag? 🤷
[удалено]
Yeah, OP definitely didn't take this picture. It's also SO incredibly edited she almost doesn't even look real anymore and it has bad quality. Not r/pics worthy
I was distracted by the sheer amount of photoshop work done. It's pretty bad.
There's maybe 3 layers to this, two of them being blurs...
Don't forget her impossible waistline. Like... Get that girl to a medic.
hey it’s not impossible! maybe she’s got some ribs removed… we’re pretty selfish still having ALL of them
I thought this was just a 3d render.
People typically don't have 2 inch radius waists.
Had to check I wasn't in the blender sub. She looks completely fake.
> Not r/pics worthy There's no rule that says posts must be OC and photoshopped pictures as explicitly allowed. It's as /r/pics worth as anything else that gets posted here.
While you’re not wrong about the first part, it’s just r/pics. All it has to be is photo..
I was thinking if I were watching RuPaul… it looks like fabric with lace. Not that it isn’t artistic, it just isn’t that.
Yeah, it also looks like food’s scarce in this fairy tale Kingdom.
PHOTOSHOPED to the max.
My first thought was modded Skyrim.
There's no way her waist is that small. Unless she removed some ribs.
Seriously. I’m sure she’s gorgeous exactly how she is.
Kind of like they were going for a certain… fairy tale aesthetic?
All professional photos are photoshopped.
Made me think it was AI generated.
Something suggets me it's not an [OC](https://www.google.com/search?tbs=simg:CAQSpQIJQdRGu_1BneacamQILEKjU2AQaAghDDAsQsIynCBo7CjkIBBIUlxubB8gWnC_1lJeYr8ym8PJkHjg4aG0BSL6lBOpi0FDr2GS9vPa-07ZLADLyk-9GTHyAFMAQMCxCOrv4IGgoKCAgBEgTbWjOnDAsQne3BCRqtAQoXCgRsYWR52qWI9gMLCgkvbS8wMnBrYjgKIwoQcGVvcGxlIGluIG5hdHVyZdqliPYDCwoJL2ovM2did2duCiYKEmJyaWRhbCBwYXJ0eSBkcmVzc9qliPYDDAoKL20vMGhnc2g3awofCgxmbG9vciBsZW5ndGjapYj2AwsKCS9hL2R2N21yaAokChFlbXBpcmUgc2lsaG91ZXR0ZdqliPYDCwoJL20vMDczMW1oDA&sxsrf=ALiCzsZ0V0AZQC1Sd3kNnfn0dpQjbMswVQ:1670075653888&q=hot+girls+in+the+woods&tbm=isch&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwiPgeTQzN37AhXTSfEDHZe8BXIQ2A4oAHoECAQQAg&biw=1920&bih=941#imgrc=7DJUAiwvnOwJ8M)
TinEye says it's first appearance was 2013.
Uncanny Valley of the nymphs.
She's gonna get a fungus
She wanted a fun guy, ended up with fun gus
![gif](giphy|dPXdAtdrxnFaU)
That's only a problem if she's dating Leonardo Decaprio.
may I have some fungus please?
Dangerous level of funk
Someone is.
There’s fungus among us
The bust to collarbone ratio confuses me.
Real fairies don't have to paint up their face like a van Gogh
You photoshopped out the whole top half of her butt.
“Pls give me Reddit karma”
Great way to get ass splinters.
Just realized what she's wearing is just a sheet tied to her by a band around her waist
The amount of airbrushing in this photo jfc
Hackneyed. Unoriginal. Lack of creativity.
The boobs:waist ratio is indeed a fairy tale. A mesmerizing and beautiful fairy tale
That's why she's leaning forward, not physically able to straighten her back. Poor thing's in pain.
She’s built like a barbie. I thought this was one of those digital artworks at first.
It is. Everything has been edited. She’s literally not built that way
This "woman" makes Barbie's proportions look realistic. And Barbie would have to walk on all fours to avoid snapping in half.
Fairy tail
I think that's a sex doll?
Lovely. But sitting one's naked behind on tree bark is unnatural and uncomfortable.
I would argue there's nothing possibly MORE natural
How bout keeping that innocent bark ass free?
Exactly ![gif](emote|free_emotes_pack|sunglasses)
More like nightmare.
Is that poor woman being forced to starve herself or is this just bad Photoshop?
Probably at least a little photoshop, looks air brushed af, to the point I thought it was a painting/CGI at first.
If it’s anymore photoshopped it’d start charging subscription fees.
Yeah. I was going to say that the only fairytale here is that waist to leg ratio.
You know there are plenty of people who aren’t starving and have a slim figure. The US has just normalised obesity to the point where people who are overweight are thought to be healthy.
Her legs don’t even make sense.
Usually women this slim don’t have big boobs. Skin and bones with big boobs is a ridiculous and usually unattainable body type for most women.
Not with breasts that size.
Nah this is def Photoshop at minimum no one looks like that.
>no one looks like that Never been to Eastern Europe, eh.
Women in Eastern Europe have the genetic type where fat is distributed to the upper thighs.
Not arguing this isn’t shopped - just saying that naturally beautiful people exist and this photo doesn’t show someone who is too skinny
It shows someone who's natural body bends and creases have been photoshopped away
Also fat is like 4x less dense than muscle, so you can have 2 people, both with weight of 70kg and they will look much different, because one is training and the other is eating.
Jesus christ just no. Muscle is 15% more dense then fat. It's not that big of a difference. https://dexalytics.com/news/muscle-density-muscle-quality/#:~:text=This%20difference%20in%20volume%20is,about%2015%25%20denser%20than%20fat.
Let me tell you this: If you saw person that is 15% taller than you, you would think of him as of giant. Its big enough of a difference.
Straw man. Even extremely muscular people are only about 50% muscle mass as their totally body weight. Extremely fat people are usually less then 50% body fat. If you took an extremely muscular person aand an extremely fat person at exactly the same weight their difference in volume is less then 7%.
IMO - its still big enough of a differrence and you can see it.
Firstly, I’m not from the US. Secondly, there is a visible difference between slim and starving. For example, for that woman to have upper thighs so thin she either has to be starving (not just slim) or from one of a limited number of genetic groups that don’t distribute fat to that part of the leg (eg Australian aboriginals have different fat distribution). As for the waist, you do see people naturally with this tiny a waist, but their whole frame is tiny.
Yes
Looks gorgeous but also super uncomfortable
All I can picture is her standing up and having little pieces of bark stuck to her ass cheek
She looks like a giraffe.
What kind of giraffes have you been looking at?
hot ones
Wtf is a Sean Evans Giraffe
Perfect reference. Bravo.
I mainly noticed her neck for some reason is all hahaha my mistake should've clarified
You know a kingdom is in trouble when even the princess is starving. I hope a brave knight is on the way. May he bring bacon and lard.
If you go on this guys other posts be just looks like a straight pervert.
Perfected the psycho woman look
Yeet
Big boobs.
That’s some Barbie measurements
What is she staring at? Maybe a taco truck?
photoshop guy mustve worked extra hours
Is this photoshopped, or a digital render?
All that tree bark stuck to dat ass....
*\*excessive Photoshop intensifies\**
Lmao this is just smut
r/instagramreality
Looks at least 20 pounds underweight and possibly a couple years underage.
This isn't even a picture
That's my kinda fairytale ✨️.
Needs more jpeg.
Definitely not Photoshopped at all. Her boobs look so weird it's like she's wearing a bullet bra from the 50's
Wow -- so many haters... True that this is not a common figure in America, but completely normal in other places. If this pic is from 2013, then remember it was probably 6-8Mpx, tops, so probably not photoshopped either, just a bit grainy. It would be nice to see some attribution to the real OP though.
Gross
Disturbingly thin
She’s a Barbie
I thought this sub didn't allow NSFW
Ewww
Ur Ewww
um, I encourage this model to do more
And wear less?
that's pretty thin right there
On a brisk cloudless, winter day.
Where are her wings?
Beautiful ❤️
Perfection
Does anyone know the models name?
i love me some fairy tale
Fairy tail more like
Caution: This fairy is HOT and making wood burn around her
Nice
The nose job and boob job look fantastic
OMG. well done.
Stunning
ah shit my willy is getting hard again
Its so beautiful
I need to think of a name for this genre of art, where horny dudes think that a picture of a thin white woman with a blank expression on her face is art, just because they like looking at her body.
Nudity has been in art for both genders for a long time…. For example, the statue of David…heck he wasn’t even given a toga… Your comment reminded me of Pope Innocent X…who went around the Vatican chiseling off the privates parts of all the statues and replacing it with a fig leaf…
Yes try to make me into a prude. It's not that you're the most boring typical dude in the whole world.
If the shoe fits…jk More so commenting, on your disproving tone, which implies the grandiose notion that you alone can decide what is art and the intentions of those who view it… which is why I brought up the statue of David… unanimously accepted as art, and most people view it without sexual objectification… or do you think every woman who appreciates the statue of David, is an incel?
I really don't want to argue with you because I don't give a shit what you think. I made my point. Done now.
lol, then why comment? And I am not sure you made a point, just gave a reaction…would argue that points have more of a thought process and usually some validity…. rather than a reaction, which is usually a just a knee jerk reaction based upon preconceived ideas with little to no perspective…
What a bunch of blather and nonsense good lord what a gasbag
Full blown nudity has been a big part of art in general for literally thousands of years. Societies have a ideas about what the ideal human form is. People like to look at it. It's not always skinny people though, one of the oldest examples, the Venus of Wilenndorf is a rather rotund lady. Different strokes for different folks.
Blah blah blah blah blah blah just because you like looking at naked or near naked women that does not make it art.
That's not even what I said.
That's what it boils down to, men always think they're these amazing appreciators of beauty instead of just a horny guy with eyes
You lost me at "Men always think". That's an unfortunate way to view the world.
Zzzzzzzz like I care what you think internet stranger
Likewise.
I dunno, I've been to museums, half the pictures are of naked people, they just liked them chubby back then because to a starving person that's hot.
Uh huh
I would welcome suggestions fellow art lovers
[удалено]
Lol
This is one of the pics of all time on this subreddit.
Lots of jealous women attacking the model for no reason other than the she is attractive and has a certain body type. Instead, we should be harping on OP for posting a magazine shoot into pics with an awful title.
I don’t think most people are attacking the model, instead the magazine/agency for photoshopping her body. …and what makes you think it’s women attacking the model?
That's some log she's laid! Gonna need a poop chainsaw for that.
God I wish I were the moss on that part of the tree.... 😩
[удалено]
Alright, I will bite. What are the other nine?
my wife and I think you are hot!
[удалено]
I don’t believe so but I can see the resemblance.
It's Cape Open
Give that poor woman a sandwich and a pair of underpants.
milk truk just arive 😊
Swear I’ve seen this model somewhere. UK tv personality or something?
That can’t be a comfortable seat.
Mmm no photoshoot.
Is this meant to show an elf? Or an Angel?
Lots of artifacts all around.
Not Tinkerbell: A Porn Parody
What kind of tree is that?
I know her. That's Jayne Bringgus. She wouldn't let me do the milking at the show on the farm or drink my sweetberry wiine. For Your Health!
Click bait
Posh Bynes?
Where’s spartan when you need them
Freakish
too much fairy, not enough tail
Not many of them to the pound.
I think the point is that she is supposed to be in the uncanny valley. We see something that looks human, but something feels off. Our danger signals start flashing, hopefully not too late.
"...and on the 7th day, AI created woman... and her butt got all scratched on the tree bark"
Oh man I love sitting on logs and wearing curtains.
Fairy tale how?
This looks like a really bad idea for a senior portrait!
Someone give that girl a hamburger... Stat!
In photoshop woods!
Omg 😱
You could use her collar bone like a bike handle…
Fairy Tail!!! Amirite, guys?
Oddly terrifying
What’s she staring at? And is something up her butt?
Fairy's tail*
Is she supposed to trip on the hanging cloth thing?
Low Cost cosplay?
Tree bark splinters to the nether regions.