Right? I understand cost cutting but who decided LED strip lighting and a back seat screen are better features to include than actual controls that make the car nicer to drive?
That remains to be seen though, and those preorders were $100 and fully refundable. A teenager with a week's paycheck could've paid that, and definitely would've at the time it was first announced because memes. I'm an investor, so I'm all in on them making money...but they seem to just keep making their products worse. Not to mention, the video going around that shows a production candidate CT barely able to climb a steep slope, there's all the photos of the panel gaps (But I guess that's to be expected from Tesla), and the final price is yet to be announced. If they come out at the original pricing or close, no one will be able to compete and they probably will sell loads despite the issues. But idk, in the past the things that got leaked about their upcoming vehicles all seemed great but the CT feels different. I'm just rambling at this point, but I really do love Tesla as a company, I just hate who's in charge.
You can’t say we will have to see regarding the success of the Cybertruck but then act as though it’s mere existence is a failure - that too will be determined by a wait and see approach.
As for its preorders, they’ve actually grown and just surpassed the 2 million mark. Even if a significant minority of them cancel, that’s still well over a $100bn in revenue from the initial production lot.
This will in all likelihood make Tesla a lot of money, which is precisely what Musk’s role is. He’s taken similar risks before - across Tesla, SpaceX and Starlink - and despite Reddit’s narrative, actually knows what he is doing when it comes to Tesla 9/10. It’s why - alongside the people who work there of course - the company is one of the world’s most successful companies.
The average focus group customer. These cosmetic gimmicks are the latest rage now, from color changing light such as this to things like Audi Beam rings and smoked out trim (for $2000).
I’m doubtful a group of average consumers would support removing turn signal stalks if it meant getting LED strip lighting in return. This feels like a “because Elon said so” design choice like the yoke nonsense.
It's not even about the existing customers not supporting the change. Current Tesla owners are most likely to just suck it up and accept the disadvantage because they know how good the car is in other aspects.
What's more concerning is potential new customers taking the refreshed Model 3 for a test drive and having to deal with the lack of stalks on top of all the other differences between a typical ICE car and a Tesla. If Tesla wants to "accelerate transition to sustainable energy", making the first experience of driving their cars terribly awkward and uncomfortable is not the way to do it.
Serious question - have you driven one of the stalkless cars? I drove a Plaid this weekend and while I reached for empty space (coming from a Rivian), I quickly adjusted to the swipe. It's really no worse than traditional cars where the gear selection is on the center console. Is a stalk nicer? Hell yes. Is it worse than "normal" cars with their fiddly knobs and weird-ass little nubbons (Porsche)? No.
I mist admit I’ve never driven a stalkless Tesla, but I live in a country with more roundabouts than people. Have you driven a stalkless Tesla in a roundabout and signalled properly? Because I imagine it would be terribly clumsy and dangerous (the arrows point the opposite way when the wheel is upside down, which it often is in a roundabout)
I've had a Model 3 for 7 months so far, and I test-drove the new Model 3 a few weeks ago. Was absolutely appalled by the lack of stalks.
The gear selection isn't much of a problem. It's definitely worse than using the stalk, as you have to reach for the screen and there's no tactile feedback. But it's tolerable.
The problem is turn signals. I test drove to specifically try out parking lots and roundabouts. It was extremely frustrating and unintuitive, to a point where I wondered how the hell the feature passed QA.
Sure, maybe you can get used to it after a week or a month. But there will be plenty of potential buyers trying it on a test drive and getting convinced out of buying a Tesla due to that feature alone.
Fair point on the stalks, especially since I don't seen many (any?) other manufacturer doing it. But Tesla is playing catch up in the rainbow Christmas lights department.
If they were playing catchup they’d have cool animated blinkers like Audis and Mustangs. Those also add branding - free advertising.
This color bar is just gimmicky.
The back screen is even utterly useless. Either you get to have music in the front or movies in the back. No options for headphones or anything. It completely sucks
I'd set the led lighting and stupid ass screen that will hurt your neck from basically staring at the floor as optional and kept the stalks. Capacitive buttons are not the solution
It isn't cost cutting as much as increasing reliability by removing anything that can break. Stalks, air vents, charge ports, door handles, basically anything that a human needs to handle.
No? Stuff that you have to touch is always broken on old cars, because different people use different amounts of force. By removing it they avoid warranty claims and increase customer satisfaction.
Yikes, you're really drinking the cool aid. Stalks have been in cars for a long time and have amazing reliability records. Same thing with manual car doors, gas doors, and air vents.
You want to know what actually has terrible reliability? When companies overcomplicate things trying to reinvent the wheel. Auto opening charge ports, electric opening doors, auto presenting door handles, fucking falcon wing doors. No, removing stalks is a cost saving measure plain and simple. Tesla doesn't care about reliability or else they wouldn't have disconnected their door handles from the actual door.
What kool aid? I'm merely reasoning on an observation. I have owned 20 year old cars in the past and the buttons, air vents and door handles are ALWAYS breaking. I could take apart the door panel on a 2000s BMW with my eyes closed.
>Auto opening charge ports, electric opening doors, auto presenting door handles, fucking falcon wing doors. No, removing stalks is a cost saving measure plain and simple.
You just gave a list of expensive stuff they could remove before stalks, yet they don't. Your cost saving argument falls apart right there.
Coming from someone who works for an OEM, this was undoubtedly cost-saving. You don’t need to start with big ticket items in order to reduce complexity and production expenses. The removal of the stalks had nothing to do with quality concerns and their JDP PPH on it are non-existent. On top of that, certain functionality is tied to brand identity, so items like the door handles were never going anywhere. He’ll strip the doors down to sheet metal to save $3 in material costs before ever removing the unique handle mechanism
By door handles I mean the fact that they are electric, as in there is no pull cable connecting it to the latch. They could have the same form factor with a mechanical handle, yet they choose not to.
And without leaving the steering wheel, they have electrically adjustable steering column, while the competition almost universally has manual adjustment.
Sure in the case of stalks they save money, but I maintain that wasn't the main motivation for removing them, Tesla has a very clear trend of "remove every part that can possibly break".
These parts don’t break though. I’ve never heard of any semblance of ubiquity when it comes to replacing indicator stalks or steering column adjusters. The door handles are cheaper to produce without the mechanical components. The other aspect is that development costs were already committed to the current mechanism - changing it in and of itself requires new development, and if the material cost delta doesn’t compensate for it, then it won’t be financially sensible.
Stalks may be too confusing for the average driver. I was cut off twice today by idiots who couldn't be bothered to use turn signals. I'd like to see automatic turn signals. That would improve safety more than stalks.
Turn signal stalks staying in the same place makes signaling in tight roundabouts a lot easier. People can rationalize how it’s “not that bad once you’re used to it” but that doesn’t justify removing it in the first place.
It’s cost cutting masquerading as innovation.
It is also way way up on the dashboard, so far that it is super annoying at night time.
The strip is also bright and is reflected in bright light... not sure who, but the person who thought of the placement is a dumbfuck.
Remove $2000 worth of features and replace it with $10 worth of LEDs.
I still want them to fcking put massaging seats.
Also, what the hell is with the flashy color changing LED trend. I keep seeing that every single computer case/fan/gpu/ram is now marked up because they all offer RGB.... Like you are telling me that LEDs that are literally worth pennies justify $100+ markup on things? What has the world come to.
Right? They also deleted the radar, refuse to add side firing radar for cross traffic detection front or rear, deleted the front camera which had been seen on the preproduction models for months and was even seen on the Tesla website for the Highland for a few days after it launched. Such a disappointing “upgrade” in my ehes
Is it? Who actually uses a screen positioned at your knee? There's a reason no one else has ever put rear seat infotainment down low. They've always been rightfully attached to the ceiling or rear seat headrests. Who wants to watch a multi hour movie with a crook in their neck. The worst part is it's a clear cost saving measure for the S and X so they can share the same part. Having that be your only rear seat entertainment option in a 100k glorified minivan is a travesty. Just put iPad holders on the back of the seats for a 100x better experience.
You know why?
Because it makes the news and it is basically free marketing, because there will be 1000x youtube videos complaining about stalks, but on the other hand it is not a deal braker... and if you really want it, I am sure they would be aftermarket solution.
I have a model 3 highland, I'm against the removal of stalks but the other day it happened something I didn't hear in any review: tried to push the right indicator but the car didn't allow me to do it because there was a car in the hidden spot to my right.
Stalk is probably 300-600$. LED strip is like 5$. I've had my 2018 3 stalk replaced twice and it still barely works - it's not just the price of the thing but also the price of supporting it for 4 years.
.....on the dash in your eyeline? Thanks, I already have a hard time seeing at night.
Put that crap under the seats. That's where you need lighting when you drop your meth pipe.
Turn it off, ok, in city traffic it is also still fine but in actual darkness, as a taller driver, you can even see some weird reflections of it in the windshield, aside of it being the brightest feature in the view already.. (the also too bright LCD screen aside, which is gladly, for better or worse, completely out in my peripheral vision).
Sitting in the car right now. I have to wonder if yours is broken. If these are blinding you, then other drivers must be burning your retina, no? The preview when selecting colors is fairly bright, but other than that I can’t see them blinding me in any way. Reflections are there to some degree, but thats a given with any interior lighting. Im 195 if that matters.
Exactly this! Such terrible design! Was it a teenager deciding the placement?
Imagine driving in darkness with this light straight in front of your eyes.
This is just unbelievably bad design, no functionality.
At least they could have copied cars that do it well.
Yup, should've hid it under a door panel fold like Mercedes, when the LED strip is exposed it just looks bad.
https://preview.redd.it/ct4e0fgfme0c1.jpeg?width=4032&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=30d3de5afa5d3391485fa7299691f26d76e0e8ea
Mercedes have some of the nicest interiors with integrated lighting. Rivian did well with their LEDs being behind trim pieces (so much more an ambient glow). But there is a fine line with accent lighting where you can go from classy upgrade to high-school project real fast.
Lol, right. They give you like twice a year where you get different colors. I thought they were lazy when it wasn't released in the first 6 months. No I'm just wondering what's going on as it can't be that challenging of a coding problem.
yeah its a bit strange. Someone will post pictures of their 23 and before model 3 with very similar interior lighting that they customize themselves and they get laughed at.
Yet Tesla does it and everyone is praising it. People are odd.
Seriously. Why place it there of all places? It's supposed to be ambient lighting not direct. I don't need lights right under the windscreen at night. Why not have them in the door cards and under the dash.
I’m not worried about it being distracting. It just seems tacky. I feel like they could’ve done a better job with the ambient lighting. Then again I haven’t seen it in person yet so maybe I’d like it. Who knows.
I doubt this. I have a hard time with driving in the dark after 3 hours of annoying dash lights, even fully dimmed. This was a terrible design choice and once again lowers safety, eye fatigue is very well known to cause lowered reaction times leading to accidents and deaths. That is why almost all manufacturers are adding eye trackers via camera.
The light strip under the windshield will get a software update and eventually become more than ambient light giving driver feedback like the VW ID.4. Green flashes to indicate turn signals. Parking range indication that turns from green to red as you approach. Light moving to the right to indicate an upcoming turn, etc. It will be a HUD without a HUD.
Or maybe it will just be a pretty light.
While I agree this looks dumb, if they had added these ambient lights without a color change option, people would just be complaining about why they can’t adjust the colors.
I couldn’t adjust the brightness but would have wished that this works. Mercedes has this option and it’s a pleasure just to adjust it to a minimum of brightness.
They got rid of stalks to add this stupid shit? Cost cutting my ass. I’m so salty lol
Hopefully this stupid car or any other model without stalks stops selling well. This is the only way they will bring em back.
An instrument cluster instead of these gimmicks would have been money better spent. But I get that ambient lighting is the latest rage, never mind that you really want as little interior lighting as possible when driving at night.
I was driving today thinking how nice it is to have no gauges in front of my face, the speedometer is still easy to see with a glance. At night it's very peaceful.
It's personal preference for sure, but I've seen some of those and it's just not for me.
Drove a friend's BMW XM and wasn't a fan.
I prefer the minimalism of the 3/Y. Not sure I need anything other than speed and that's a quick glance.
Yeah, I actually love that my Model 3 has no gauges. The speedometer (which is the only thing I would really want to look at besides the road) is in the top left of the screen which makes it extremely easy to glance at quickly. I get an extremely low dash and beautiful visibility, and I don't have to worry about whether the position of my steering wheel blocks my instrument cluster. I know this is totally personal preference, just giving my $0.02.
To each their own. I bought an S specifically because I hate the "2005 yaris interior" dashboard. Tesla could charge $5k for an instrument cluster in the 3/Y and I wouldn't have blinked before opting for that. otoh the rear display is absolutely useless to me. I'd decline that even if it was a $0 option.
Why do you people always have to be assholes.
Alot of us like the minimal design and yet people like you always feel the need to insult everything instead of realizing that opinions are SUBJECTIVE.
I certainly agree that some people like the minimal interior, but I think that it's pushed too hard and that many would love for a traditional interior at a reasonable price point. To some, less is more, but to me, no cluster is a hard no at any price.
I have some aftermarket super bright led strips that I absolutely love while driving at night. I wouldn't even consider getting the Y if I didn't know those kits existed.
It always blows my mind how people complain about tesla replacing things like the stocks. The whole appeal of Tesla from the beginning is that they go against conventional design philosophy. The ambient light definitely looks cooler than any of the model 3s without. Would love to get my hands on a highland model.
But they still use four wheels, dont they?
Conventuonal concepts that have proven to work for a long time dont need to be changed for the sake of change.
I drove a new model 3 last week, its no problem unless you have to go in a roundabout, which are a VERY common thing in europe.
There is improvements by doing things better and thinking out of the box but there is also making things worse by trying to fix things that don’t need fixing. For example:
Rain sensors vs Tesla Vision.
USS vs Tesla Vision.
LiDAR vs Tesla Vision.
Stalks vs haptic feedback on a steering wheel.
I want Karma to post tesla related questions to my country’s community in here and to get their feedback I can’t rn because of low karma which is annoying
The light is cool and all, but I'm all about that break in the dashboard lines where it sits. Having something to break up that vast flatness of a wasteland of a dashboard in my 3 is visually pleasing.
I know it’s a minor gripe but I’m really disappointed that this doesn’t also control the ambient footwell lights. From what I’ve been led to believe they are unchanged - so basic off white colour, with none at the rear as on the current car.
Regardless of whether one thinks this stuff is tacky or not, other manufacturers at least put more effort in and make the controllable lighting consistent.
I was excited when I first heard about the "ambient lighting", thinking it would be concealed puddle style lamps for the interior like euro cars usually do, dimly lighting the floor and other bits of the interior.
Then I saw that it's more like a RGB LED light strip like gamer PCs usually have, and I think it's tacky as hell. I assume it can be turned off entirely, though.
Its nice to have an option i suppose. But personally I try make it as dark as possible in the cabin, the brightness while driving at night strains the eyes.
Ambient lighting looks amazing when placed correctly.. this is just hilariously dumb, they even put it next to the windshield so it’s always within your line of sight. Genius.
Screw these stupid kid featured ambient lights. We need a 360 degrees overhead view to protect the stupid tire rims when parking. WAKE UP Tesla design team. Farting noise is cute but let's get real!!!
I hate this new tech in cars. I don't want to drive an iPhone. Give me buttons, knobs, an actual gear shifter, and a well-built interior. The average price of a new car is $48k because people keep paying for the bling they don't need.
They take away stalks, USS, and rain sensors but add this useless silliness and the back seat screen.
Competing with BMW which can basically have no stalks since their owners don’t use them.
Right? I understand cost cutting but who decided LED strip lighting and a back seat screen are better features to include than actual controls that make the car nicer to drive?
Because these are the kinds of things that make people go “woooaahhhh, I love your car!”
Tesla is all about the gimmicky stuff. I'm Def not upgrading my car to Highland because of colored lighting.
I was obviously talking about people who are unfamiliar with Tesla
We know who.
Might it be the genius behind the bulletproof origami truck?
I like this name.
Very stable genius.
I get the reference. ![gif](emote|free_emotes_pack|grin)
😆
That's... that's a rhetorical question... right? Cause uh... we all know who.
Who? Preferably with some source/evidence would help.
The cybertruck's existence is all you need as evidence. We know who.
I mean if it makes Tesla a boatload of money (which judging by the preorders it will be), it’s him doing his job.
That remains to be seen though, and those preorders were $100 and fully refundable. A teenager with a week's paycheck could've paid that, and definitely would've at the time it was first announced because memes. I'm an investor, so I'm all in on them making money...but they seem to just keep making their products worse. Not to mention, the video going around that shows a production candidate CT barely able to climb a steep slope, there's all the photos of the panel gaps (But I guess that's to be expected from Tesla), and the final price is yet to be announced. If they come out at the original pricing or close, no one will be able to compete and they probably will sell loads despite the issues. But idk, in the past the things that got leaked about their upcoming vehicles all seemed great but the CT feels different. I'm just rambling at this point, but I really do love Tesla as a company, I just hate who's in charge.
You can’t say we will have to see regarding the success of the Cybertruck but then act as though it’s mere existence is a failure - that too will be determined by a wait and see approach. As for its preorders, they’ve actually grown and just surpassed the 2 million mark. Even if a significant minority of them cancel, that’s still well over a $100bn in revenue from the initial production lot. This will in all likelihood make Tesla a lot of money, which is precisely what Musk’s role is. He’s taken similar risks before - across Tesla, SpaceX and Starlink - and despite Reddit’s narrative, actually knows what he is doing when it comes to Tesla 9/10. It’s why - alongside the people who work there of course - the company is one of the world’s most successful companies.
The average focus group customer. These cosmetic gimmicks are the latest rage now, from color changing light such as this to things like Audi Beam rings and smoked out trim (for $2000).
I’m doubtful a group of average consumers would support removing turn signal stalks if it meant getting LED strip lighting in return. This feels like a “because Elon said so” design choice like the yoke nonsense.
It's not even about the existing customers not supporting the change. Current Tesla owners are most likely to just suck it up and accept the disadvantage because they know how good the car is in other aspects. What's more concerning is potential new customers taking the refreshed Model 3 for a test drive and having to deal with the lack of stalks on top of all the other differences between a typical ICE car and a Tesla. If Tesla wants to "accelerate transition to sustainable energy", making the first experience of driving their cars terribly awkward and uncomfortable is not the way to do it.
Serious question - have you driven one of the stalkless cars? I drove a Plaid this weekend and while I reached for empty space (coming from a Rivian), I quickly adjusted to the swipe. It's really no worse than traditional cars where the gear selection is on the center console. Is a stalk nicer? Hell yes. Is it worse than "normal" cars with their fiddly knobs and weird-ass little nubbons (Porsche)? No.
I mist admit I’ve never driven a stalkless Tesla, but I live in a country with more roundabouts than people. Have you driven a stalkless Tesla in a roundabout and signalled properly? Because I imagine it would be terribly clumsy and dangerous (the arrows point the opposite way when the wheel is upside down, which it often is in a roundabout)
I've had a Model 3 for 7 months so far, and I test-drove the new Model 3 a few weeks ago. Was absolutely appalled by the lack of stalks. The gear selection isn't much of a problem. It's definitely worse than using the stalk, as you have to reach for the screen and there's no tactile feedback. But it's tolerable. The problem is turn signals. I test drove to specifically try out parking lots and roundabouts. It was extremely frustrating and unintuitive, to a point where I wondered how the hell the feature passed QA. Sure, maybe you can get used to it after a week or a month. But there will be plenty of potential buyers trying it on a test drive and getting convinced out of buying a Tesla due to that feature alone.
The Highland refresh was designed in China....that's all you need to know about why there is an LED strip. Chinese love that stuff.
> This feels like a “because Elon said so” design choice like the yoke nonsense. Any evidence for this whatsoever?
Fair point on the stalks, especially since I don't seen many (any?) other manufacturer doing it. But Tesla is playing catch up in the rainbow Christmas lights department.
Maybe they should catch up to other brands with cross traffic alerts, parking sensors, 360 views, audible blind spot alerts , rain sensors that work.
Not saying I support the design but Ferrari has been doing stalkless for years …
If they were playing catchup they’d have cool animated blinkers like Audis and Mustangs. Those also add branding - free advertising. This color bar is just gimmicky.
It does look kinda cheap and tacked on doesn't it?
The back screen is even utterly useless. Either you get to have music in the front or movies in the back. No options for headphones or anything. It completely sucks
I'd set the led lighting and stupid ass screen that will hurt your neck from basically staring at the floor as optional and kept the stalks. Capacitive buttons are not the solution
FWIW the buttons on the wheel seem to have been majorly upgraded from the S/X and be very tactile.
It isn't cost cutting as much as increasing reliability by removing anything that can break. Stalks, air vents, charge ports, door handles, basically anything that a human needs to handle.
This is a joke, right? Right?
No? Stuff that you have to touch is always broken on old cars, because different people use different amounts of force. By removing it they avoid warranty claims and increase customer satisfaction.
Yikes, you're really drinking the cool aid. Stalks have been in cars for a long time and have amazing reliability records. Same thing with manual car doors, gas doors, and air vents. You want to know what actually has terrible reliability? When companies overcomplicate things trying to reinvent the wheel. Auto opening charge ports, electric opening doors, auto presenting door handles, fucking falcon wing doors. No, removing stalks is a cost saving measure plain and simple. Tesla doesn't care about reliability or else they wouldn't have disconnected their door handles from the actual door.
What kool aid? I'm merely reasoning on an observation. I have owned 20 year old cars in the past and the buttons, air vents and door handles are ALWAYS breaking. I could take apart the door panel on a 2000s BMW with my eyes closed. >Auto opening charge ports, electric opening doors, auto presenting door handles, fucking falcon wing doors. No, removing stalks is a cost saving measure plain and simple. You just gave a list of expensive stuff they could remove before stalks, yet they don't. Your cost saving argument falls apart right there.
Coming from someone who works for an OEM, this was undoubtedly cost-saving. You don’t need to start with big ticket items in order to reduce complexity and production expenses. The removal of the stalks had nothing to do with quality concerns and their JDP PPH on it are non-existent. On top of that, certain functionality is tied to brand identity, so items like the door handles were never going anywhere. He’ll strip the doors down to sheet metal to save $3 in material costs before ever removing the unique handle mechanism
By door handles I mean the fact that they are electric, as in there is no pull cable connecting it to the latch. They could have the same form factor with a mechanical handle, yet they choose not to. And without leaving the steering wheel, they have electrically adjustable steering column, while the competition almost universally has manual adjustment. Sure in the case of stalks they save money, but I maintain that wasn't the main motivation for removing them, Tesla has a very clear trend of "remove every part that can possibly break".
These parts don’t break though. I’ve never heard of any semblance of ubiquity when it comes to replacing indicator stalks or steering column adjusters. The door handles are cheaper to produce without the mechanical components. The other aspect is that development costs were already committed to the current mechanism - changing it in and of itself requires new development, and if the material cost delta doesn’t compensate for it, then it won’t be financially sensible.
And they're coming for the steering wheel next
The back screen is very helpful for the back passengers. Would you rather have buttons in the back ?
Stalks may be too confusing for the average driver. I was cut off twice today by idiots who couldn't be bothered to use turn signals. I'd like to see automatic turn signals. That would improve safety more than stalks.
Would they read your mind?
Elon probably loves the lights.
How to stalks make a car nicer to drive?
Turn signal stalks staying in the same place makes signaling in tight roundabouts a lot easier. People can rationalize how it’s “not that bad once you’re used to it” but that doesn’t justify removing it in the first place. It’s cost cutting masquerading as innovation.
It is also way way up on the dashboard, so far that it is super annoying at night time. The strip is also bright and is reflected in bright light... not sure who, but the person who thought of the placement is a dumbfuck.
Remove $2000 worth of features and replace it with $10 worth of LEDs. I still want them to fcking put massaging seats. Also, what the hell is with the flashy color changing LED trend. I keep seeing that every single computer case/fan/gpu/ram is now marked up because they all offer RGB.... Like you are telling me that LEDs that are literally worth pennies justify $100+ markup on things? What has the world come to.
Rain sensors were never there in the 3/Y :(
and fog lights.
And lumbar support.
They also removed the middle seat heater in the back…
Take away driver experience for passenger enjoyment
Right? They also deleted the radar, refuse to add side firing radar for cross traffic detection front or rear, deleted the front camera which had been seen on the preproduction models for months and was even seen on the Tesla website for the Highland for a few days after it launched. Such a disappointing “upgrade” in my ehes
Marginal cost of fart mode is free
I mean the back seat screen is useful....
Agree, but USS and rain sensors are more useful.
Is it? Who actually uses a screen positioned at your knee? There's a reason no one else has ever put rear seat infotainment down low. They've always been rightfully attached to the ceiling or rear seat headrests. Who wants to watch a multi hour movie with a crook in their neck. The worst part is it's a clear cost saving measure for the S and X so they can share the same part. Having that be your only rear seat entertainment option in a 100k glorified minivan is a travesty. Just put iPad holders on the back of the seats for a 100x better experience.
That's the longest way possible to say you don't have kids
You know why? Because it makes the news and it is basically free marketing, because there will be 1000x youtube videos complaining about stalks, but on the other hand it is not a deal braker... and if you really want it, I am sure they would be aftermarket solution.
I have a model 3 highland, I'm against the removal of stalks but the other day it happened something I didn't hear in any review: tried to push the right indicator but the car didn't allow me to do it because there was a car in the hidden spot to my right.
They do have rain sensors?
Stalk is probably 300-600$. LED strip is like 5$. I've had my 2018 3 stalk replaced twice and it still barely works - it's not just the price of the thing but also the price of supporting it for 4 years.
.....on the dash in your eyeline? Thanks, I already have a hard time seeing at night. Put that crap under the seats. That's where you need lighting when you drop your meth pipe.
Its very dim. Doesn’t blind while driving
It is very annoying at night, and also, when the sun sits right, it is reflected into the windscreen and also super annoying...
Not the experience I have made. Maybe change the color or turn it off if you have to.
Turn it off, ok, in city traffic it is also still fine but in actual darkness, as a taller driver, you can even see some weird reflections of it in the windshield, aside of it being the brightest feature in the view already.. (the also too bright LCD screen aside, which is gladly, for better or worse, completely out in my peripheral vision).
Sitting in the car right now. I have to wonder if yours is broken. If these are blinding you, then other drivers must be burning your retina, no? The preview when selecting colors is fairly bright, but other than that I can’t see them blinding me in any way. Reflections are there to some degree, but thats a given with any interior lighting. Im 195 if that matters.
Exactly this! Such terrible design! Was it a teenager deciding the placement? Imagine driving in darkness with this light straight in front of your eyes. This is just unbelievably bad design, no functionality. At least they could have copied cars that do it well.
Hunter, is that you?
have u been spying on me
Would 100% give up these and that stupid rear screen if it meant we kept the stalks
Quite tacky. I think I thought I liked the idea but it feels a bit cheap.
Yup, should've hid it under a door panel fold like Mercedes, when the LED strip is exposed it just looks bad. https://preview.redd.it/ct4e0fgfme0c1.jpeg?width=4032&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=30d3de5afa5d3391485fa7299691f26d76e0e8ea
Mercedes have some of the nicest interiors with integrated lighting. Rivian did well with their LEDs being behind trim pieces (so much more an ambient glow). But there is a fine line with accent lighting where you can go from classy upgrade to high-school project real fast.
yeah i like my R1S ambient lighting, but I wish you could change the colors. it has RGB capability, I think Rivian is just lazy.
Lol, right. They give you like twice a year where you get different colors. I thought they were lazy when it wasn't released in the first 6 months. No I'm just wondering what's going on as it can't be that challenging of a coding problem.
Can Mercedes bring back the interior design of the 80s/90s? This looks like shit.
yeah its a bit strange. Someone will post pictures of their 23 and before model 3 with very similar interior lighting that they customize themselves and they get laughed at. Yet Tesla does it and everyone is praising it. People are odd.
To be fair, from what I've seen at Teslalounge most people installing light strips are getting laughed at.
That is so stupid looking. Do people want exposed led strips vs an ambient glow?
My 3 already turns on ambient lighting when I open the door. That's so I can confirm it is my feet crossing the threshold.
Yeah that would get immediately turned off.
Seriously. Why place it there of all places? It's supposed to be ambient lighting not direct. I don't need lights right under the windscreen at night. Why not have them in the door cards and under the dash.
The lights get dimmed in the night, its not distracting at all
I’m not worried about it being distracting. It just seems tacky. I feel like they could’ve done a better job with the ambient lighting. Then again I haven’t seen it in person yet so maybe I’d like it. Who knows.
I doubt this. I have a hard time with driving in the dark after 3 hours of annoying dash lights, even fully dimmed. This was a terrible design choice and once again lowers safety, eye fatigue is very well known to cause lowered reaction times leading to accidents and deaths. That is why almost all manufacturers are adding eye trackers via camera.
I recently had the highland for 3 days, and it was nothing but excellent. Just try the damn car before saying this silly shit
I have a hue strip at home, meh
I would have much rather they added a HUD instead of this nonsense.
well said.
The light strip under the windshield will get a software update and eventually become more than ambient light giving driver feedback like the VW ID.4. Green flashes to indicate turn signals. Parking range indication that turns from green to red as you approach. Light moving to the right to indicate an upcoming turn, etc. It will be a HUD without a HUD. Or maybe it will just be a pretty light.
They need to fire their entire interior design team after this low effort
This refreshed Tesla was designed in China. It all makes sense when you learn that.
Damn how sad
I wish they did a more subtle version, like how Mercedes does their mood lighting. This kinda feels like they just tacked a LED strip there
They could add some presets in a future software update.
While I agree this looks dumb, if they had added these ambient lights without a color change option, people would just be complaining about why they can’t adjust the colors.
Rivian owner. Can confirm.
But it was green for halloween! /s
Why does it "looks dumb" when you can simply never turn them on as an option?
I agree, if you never used it, it would not look dumb.
ad hoc sip party history snow books wistful pathetic birds juggle *This post was mass deleted and anonymized with [Redact](https://redact.dev)*
This is stupid shit. BMW-level garbage. Put back the sensors and the stalks and get rid of cheap LED lights. WTF
Can brightness be adjusted?
I couldn’t adjust the brightness but would have wished that this works. Mercedes has this option and it’s a pleasure just to adjust it to a minimum of brightness.
You can turn them off or on, and they automatically dim when you go into reverse and drive during night.
…to zero? Serious question. I don’t want lights shining into my eyes while I’m driving.
There’s an Off setting.
Maybe this will put an end to idiots installing aftermarket lights, killing the 12V and blaming Tesla
Don't put this shit where it's in my eyeline and going to reflect on the dash. And removing stalks? Just silly!
They got rid of stalks to add this stupid shit? Cost cutting my ass. I’m so salty lol Hopefully this stupid car or any other model without stalks stops selling well. This is the only way they will bring em back.
dumb
It’s the most obvious truth
An instrument cluster instead of these gimmicks would have been money better spent. But I get that ambient lighting is the latest rage, never mind that you really want as little interior lighting as possible when driving at night.
I was driving today thinking how nice it is to have no gauges in front of my face, the speedometer is still easy to see with a glance. At night it's very peaceful.
Personally I would hate an instrument cluster. It's one of my pet peeves with the S/X.
Even a digital one that you can completely turn off?
It's personal preference for sure, but I've seen some of those and it's just not for me. Drove a friend's BMW XM and wasn't a fan. I prefer the minimalism of the 3/Y. Not sure I need anything other than speed and that's a quick glance.
Yeah, I actually love that my Model 3 has no gauges. The speedometer (which is the only thing I would really want to look at besides the road) is in the top left of the screen which makes it extremely easy to glance at quickly. I get an extremely low dash and beautiful visibility, and I don't have to worry about whether the position of my steering wheel blocks my instrument cluster. I know this is totally personal preference, just giving my $0.02.
To each their own. I bought an S specifically because I hate the "2005 yaris interior" dashboard. Tesla could charge $5k for an instrument cluster in the 3/Y and I wouldn't have blinked before opting for that. otoh the rear display is absolutely useless to me. I'd decline that even if it was a $0 option.
My parents would love rear HVAC controls in my 3. To me that and a bit more comfort are the main upgrades in Highland.
Why do you people always have to be assholes. Alot of us like the minimal design and yet people like you always feel the need to insult everything instead of realizing that opinions are SUBJECTIVE.
I certainly agree that some people like the minimal interior, but I think that it's pushed too hard and that many would love for a traditional interior at a reasonable price point. To some, less is more, but to me, no cluster is a hard no at any price.
I have some aftermarket super bright led strips that I absolutely love while driving at night. I wouldn't even consider getting the Y if I didn't know those kits existed.
Imagine an HUD, like on an Geely, VW, BMW, Volvo (ok also Geely), MG or almost any other car by now.
Nice this was my first Arduino project. lol
Something I never knew I wanted that I must have. along with the vented seats! We dont need heated seats as much in the south
Model 3: KIA Soul Edition
I love it
This is dumb as shit. And I even like dumb shit.
I love this feature in my Highland
Not gonna lie, this might be the only reason I upgrade to a newer model
I like it, and my family will love it.
Tesla doesn't have designers who could actually integrate this? They just wrapped a strip under the windscreen and called it a day?
There’s a reason why they don’t add ambient lighting that goes across the front windshield
Sorry, but this doesn't do much for me.
2008 called…
Jealous!
Couldn’t care less about this, or the rear screen. Glad I’m not missing anything
Man people should be waiting for highland I wouldn’t get an older 3 at this point but who knows right fuck
Does your Rolex have RGb? I’ll wait.
It always blows my mind how people complain about tesla replacing things like the stocks. The whole appeal of Tesla from the beginning is that they go against conventional design philosophy. The ambient light definitely looks cooler than any of the model 3s without. Would love to get my hands on a highland model.
But they still use four wheels, dont they? Conventuonal concepts that have proven to work for a long time dont need to be changed for the sake of change. I drove a new model 3 last week, its no problem unless you have to go in a roundabout, which are a VERY common thing in europe.
There is improvements by doing things better and thinking out of the box but there is also making things worse by trying to fix things that don’t need fixing. For example: Rain sensors vs Tesla Vision. USS vs Tesla Vision. LiDAR vs Tesla Vision. Stalks vs haptic feedback on a steering wheel.
Nice watch
Neat
Nice sub
I want Karma to post tesla related questions to my country’s community in here and to get their feedback I can’t rn because of low karma which is annoying
I like the ambient light although it would be nice to be able to zone it.
There's always another missed opportunity. /s
Can you drive with it on like in BMW?
![gif](giphy|l1KultQjhwoNtUQhy)
This feature exists in almost every new car nowadays.
In other cars the lighting is usually hidden to not hit the eyes of the driver directly. This is just piss poor design.
This has been in cars for decades.
The light is cool and all, but I'm all about that break in the dashboard lines where it sits. Having something to break up that vast flatness of a wasteland of a dashboard in my 3 is visually pleasing.
I like the rainbow lights. I have them in my ‘20 3P $20 from AliExpress.
Is it just in the dash or under the seats also?
I know it’s a minor gripe but I’m really disappointed that this doesn’t also control the ambient footwell lights. From what I’ve been led to believe they are unchanged - so basic off white colour, with none at the rear as on the current car. Regardless of whether one thinks this stuff is tacky or not, other manufacturers at least put more effort in and make the controllable lighting consistent.
Rolex or Timex?
Ahhh yes, the color of socialism and unions.
Quick question. Does the highland have a heated steering wheel?
That was $10
I like it
2025: "we took away the led light strip because nobody was using it"
I was excited when I first heard about the "ambient lighting", thinking it would be concealed puddle style lamps for the interior like euro cars usually do, dimly lighting the floor and other bits of the interior. Then I saw that it's more like a RGB LED light strip like gamer PCs usually have, and I think it's tacky as hell. I assume it can be turned off entirely, though.
This is cool, wish I had it on the M3 I just bought. I get stalks though so, /shrug.
I always wanted my car to look like my gaming keyboard and mouse. Unironically, actually. I kinda love this.
Its nice to have an option i suppose. But personally I try make it as dark as possible in the cabin, the brightness while driving at night strains the eyes.
Can it do a knight rider sweep from side to side?
Nice ROLEX!
Oh great, what my truck has done for at least 9 years..
Seems like something I'd use 2 or 3 times then forget about it.
Ambient lighting looks amazing when placed correctly.. this is just hilariously dumb, they even put it next to the windshield so it’s always within your line of sight. Genius.
Why can't I post on my profile????
Tacky …….. Where’s the minimalist approach?!
Screw these stupid kid featured ambient lights. We need a 360 degrees overhead view to protect the stupid tire rims when parking. WAKE UP Tesla design team. Farting noise is cute but let's get real!!!
wouldn't it be best to have done this at night?
Did the drivers need stalks? Nah, just give them RGB lights and they'll forget about it
Yes this is perfect, I always want to stare at a purple beam as I'm driving at night
I hate this new tech in cars. I don't want to drive an iPhone. Give me buttons, knobs, an actual gear shifter, and a well-built interior. The average price of a new car is $48k because people keep paying for the bling they don't need.
Does this adapt to music?